JB/087/080/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/080/004: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
<note>Satisfying</note>
<note>Satisfying</note>


<p>With regard to the facility of getting employment<lb/>the female sex are apt to be under<lb/>peculiar disadvantage.  This is the case more<lb/>particularly with those who <del>are of a rank</del><lb/>are of classes <add>a rank</add> which though not superior to<lb/>industry are <add>somewhat</add> above the condition of ordinary<lb/>labour.  These find themselves in but too great<lb/>a degree bereft of employment by the superior<lb/>activity, liberty and perhaps dexterity of the<lb/>men.  Employments which seem peculiarly<lb/>suited to the female sex and which can scarcely<lb/>be practised without indecorum by the male<lb/>are <add>either</add> shared in by the latter or engrossed.<lb/>We see <del>men matin</del> <add>men-haberdashers,</add> men-milliners, men<lb/>makers of women's shoes, men stay-makers,<lb/>and above all men-midwives.  With regard<lb/><add><del>at</del></add> to all these <del>unless perhaps the last,</del> I have sometimes thought that<lb/>it might be not <add>be</add> amiss if the injustice created<lb/>by <del>nature</del> custom though favoured perhaps by<lb/>nature, were <del>do</del> redressed by law, and the female<lb/>sex put into the exclusive profession of<lb/>these sources of subsistence. The purity of the sex<lb/>would be favoured in a double point of view: <del>as</del> <add>as</add> for<lb/>the want of <add>suitable</add> employment for women of some sort <add>little</add> <lb/>of education may fairly be reckoned among<lb/>the causes of prostitution.<lb/></p><pb/>
<p>With regard to the facility of getting employment<lb/>the female sex are apt to be under<lb/>peculiar disadvantage.  This is the case more<lb/>particularly with those who <del>are of a rank</del><lb/>are of classes <add>a rank</add> which though not superior to<lb/>industry are <add>somewhat</add> above the condition of ordinary<lb/>labour.  These find themselves in but too great<lb/>a degree bereft of employment by the superior<lb/>activity, liberty and perhaps dexterity of the<lb/>men.  Employments which seem peculiarly<lb/>suited to the female sex and which can scarcely<lb/>be practised without indecorum by the male<lb/>are <add>either</add> shared in by the latter or engrossed.<lb/>We see <del>men matin</del> <add>men-haberdashers,</add> men-milliners, men<lb/>makers of women's shoes, men stay-makers,<lb/>and above all men-midwives.  With regard<lb/><add><del>at</del></add> to all these <del>unless perhaps the last,</del> I have sometimes thought that<lb/>it might be not <add>be</add> amiss if the injustice created<lb/>by <del>nature</del> custom though favoured perhaps by<lb/>nature, were <del>do</del> redressed by law, and the female<lb/>sex put into the exclusive profession of<lb/>these sources of subsistence. The purity of the sex<lb/>would be favoured in a double point of view: <del>as</del> <add>as</add> for<lb/>the want of <add>suitable</add> employment for women of some sort <add>little</add> <lb/>of education may fairly be reckoned among<lb/>the causes of prostitution.<lb/></p>




Line 44: Line 44:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:23, 14 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

Indirect Legislation

Satisfying

With regard to the facility of getting employment
the female sex are apt to be under
peculiar disadvantage. This is the case more
particularly with those who are of a rank
are of classes a rank which though not superior to
industry are somewhat above the condition of ordinary
labour. These find themselves in but too great
a degree bereft of employment by the superior
activity, liberty and perhaps dexterity of the
men. Employments which seem peculiarly
suited to the female sex and which can scarcely
be practised without indecorum by the male
are either shared in by the latter or engrossed.
We see men matin men-haberdashers, men-milliners, men
makers of women's shoes, men stay-makers,
and above all men-midwives. With regard
at to all these unless perhaps the last, I have sometimes thought that
it might be not be amiss if the injustice created
by nature custom though favoured perhaps by
nature, were do redressed by law, and the female
sex put into the exclusive profession of
these sources of subsistence. The purity of the sex
would be favoured in a double point of view: as as for
the want of suitable employment for women of some sort little
of education may fairly be reckoned among
the causes of prostitution.




















Identifier: | JB/087/080/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

080

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f49 / f50 / f51 / f52

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27605

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in