JB/137/412/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/412/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 27<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>1 <del>C</del> <hi rend="underline">1</hi> 12<lb/> <note>III Experience<lb/>I. <gap/> Rules</note><lb/>(1) 1 <note> Sc</note></p> <p><note>12 or 1<lb/>Democratic ascendency<lb/>thus ascendable<lb/>to find right<lb/>of property secure<lb/>against subversion<lb/>look &#x2014; not to <sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical<lb/>Ascendency<lb/>but pure Democracy</note></p> <p><note>13 or 2<lb/><foreign><unclear>Anglici</unclear></foreign> secure<lb/>against plundering<lb/>from financier and<lb/>lawyer no unmoveable<lb/>property is.<lb/>On every transfer or<lb/>settlement, secure<lb/>of being subject to it. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></note></p> <p><note>14 or 3<lb/>Nor against loss of<lb/> the whole by bad titles;<lb/>so thick the uncertainties<lb/>on which the lawyer<lb/>by the assistance of the other <sic>corruptionists</sic><lb/>have involved the<lb/>acts of <gap/></note></p> <p><del>Yes</del>: Well then: if<lb/><del>No</del>. Democratic ascendency <del>being</del> is thus <sic>unconsiderable</sic>, those<lb/>who would wish to see "the rights of property" secure against<lb/>"subversion", it is not to <del>name</del> <sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical ascendency<lb/> but to pure Democracy that they must look<lb/>for it.  Ah! when will those rights be so <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>secure in England</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> as they have always been in <del>the</del> every one of<lb/>the United States?  In England, <add>where</add> I had almost <unclear>acted</unclear>,<lb/><del>where</del> is the <del><gap/></del> mass of <del>hundred</del> property in an unusable<lb/>shape that is secure?  Secure against plunderings<lb/>to an enormous amount from <del>that</del> the conveyancing<lb/>tribe <del>of the men of law</del> <add>and the men of finance together,</add> none is: on the <del><gap/></del> contrary,<lb/>upon any transfer or new settlement secure of being<lb/> subjected to it: <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> secure even against the loss of the whole<lb/>by bad titles nobody is: so thick is the uncertainty <del><gap/></del><lb/>in <del><gap/></del> which by a system of <add>the most elaborately</add> organized <add> and matchless</add> confusion, <del>unknown<lb/>in every other country they h</del> the company in the<lb/>regiment of <sic>corruptionists</sic> have <add><del>by the association of the others</del></add> succeeded in involving<lb/><del>the <gap/> branch of <gap/><gap/></del> <add> the <del>fate of</del> condition of the landed property of the country</add> <del>by the power of the</del> <add><del>and association</del></add><lb/><add>the rule of action on this behalf, by the power and assistance of the</add><lb/>rest.  Ask <del>the Marquis</del> <add>Lord Clinton else: ask Lord Holland else:</add> <lb/><unclear>universal</unclear> ask so many other <del>landhol</del> great landholders, whose <add><del><gap/> <gap/> Lord</del></add> <!-- continues into margin --> land, <del>has stepped from<lb/>under</del> after having<lb/>been settled upon them<lb/>by the Bar, has been<lb/>torn from them by<lb/>the Bench.  But<lb/>why open the wounds<lb/>of the plundered?<lb/><del>Holland <gap/>:</del> ask the <del>Conveyancers</del> <add> plunderers</add> themselves &#x2014; ask any of<lb/>them.</p>  <p><note>Ask Lords<lb/>Clinton, Holland &amp;c nay ask<lb/>conveyancers themselves</note></p> <p>Behold in this insincerity the <del>just and</del> natural <add>and just</add> punishment<lb/>of aristocratical injustice: <add>the</add> <del>that</del> injustice <add><del>unnatural</del></add> <del>which</del><lb/><del>sacrifices</del> of the unnatural fathers who, <del>sacrifice all</del><lb/><del><gap/> but one</del> to <del><gap/> the one with wealth</del> <add> cram with indolence and insolence <del>that one.</del></add><lb/><del>and <unclear>produce</unclear> that one</del> one of his children, sacrifices all the rest.<lb/><!-- line in ink across the page --> <del>with <gap/> and several <gap/> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del></p>  <p><note>13 <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> or 2 <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/><del><gap/></del> £28,000<lb/> the subject of a marriage<lb/>settlement: £2,700<lb/>the costs</note></p> <p>Note (a)<lb/> £28,000 the value of a mass of property put into settlement on the<lb/><del>which except that of power their eyes are capable of</del><lb/>occasion of a marriage: £2,700 the costs of the conveyance &#x2014; Some<lb/><del>beholding it </del><lb/>years ago, this was stated to me by a Conveyancer of the first eminence<lb/>as a fact within his knowledge.</p>       






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:36, 21 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec. 27
Radicalism not dangerous

1 C 1 12
III Experience
I. Rules

(1) 1 Sc

12 or 1
Democratic ascendency
thus ascendable
to find right
of property secure
against subversion
look — not to Monarchico-Aristocratical
Ascendency
but pure Democracy

13 or 2
Anglici secure
against plundering
from financier and
lawyer no unmoveable
property is.
On every transfer or
settlement, secure
of being subject to it. (a)

14 or 3
Nor against loss of
the whole by bad titles;
so thick the uncertainties
on which the lawyer
by the assistance of the other corruptionists
have involved the
acts of

Yes: Well then: if
No. Democratic ascendency being is thus unconsiderable, those
who would wish to see "the rights of property" secure against
"subversion", it is not to name Monarchico-Aristocratical ascendency
but to pure Democracy that they must look
for it. Ah! when will those rights be so secure in England
as they have always been in the every one of
the United States? In England, where I had almost acted,
where is the mass of hundred property in an unusable
shape that is secure? Secure against plunderings
to an enormous amount from that the conveyancing
tribe of the men of law and the men of finance together, none is: on the contrary,
upon any transfer or new settlement secure of being
subjected to it: (a) secure even against the loss of the whole
by bad titles nobody is: so thick is the uncertainty
in which by a system of the most elaborately organized and matchless confusion, unknown
in every other country they h
the company in the
regiment of corruptionists have by the association of the others succeeded in involving
the branch of the fate of condition of the landed property of the country by the power of the and association
the rule of action on this behalf, by the power and assistance of the
rest. Ask the Marquis Lord Clinton else: ask Lord Holland else:
universal ask so many other landhol great landholders, whose Lord land, has stepped from
under
after having
been settled upon them
by the Bar, has been
torn from them by
the Bench. But
why open the wounds
of the plundered?
Holland : ask the Conveyancers plunderers themselves — ask any of
them.

Ask Lords
Clinton, Holland &c nay ask
conveyancers themselves

Behold in this insincerity the just and natural and just punishment
of aristocratical injustice: the that injustice unnatural which
sacrifices of the unnatural fathers who, sacrifice all
but one to the one with wealth cram with indolence and insolence that one.
and produce that one one of his children, sacrifices all the rest.
with and several the

13 (a) or 2 (a)
£28,000
the subject of a marriage
settlement: £2,700
the costs

Note (a)
£28,000 the value of a mass of property put into settlement on the
which except that of power their eyes are capable of
occasion of a marriage: £2,700 the costs of the conveyance — Some
beholding it
years ago, this was stated to me by a Conveyancer of the first eminence
as a fact within his knowledge.




Identifier: | JB/137/412/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

12 or 1 - 14 or 3, 13a or 2a

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

412

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d12 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47129

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in