JB/137/112/001

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 23
Radicalism not

+ +. II. Nature of the case
2 § 3.III Moveables
Husbandry Stock

26
1. For example
articles of value
independent of
fancy-husbandry
&c stock.
No article exceeding
the value of an equal
share lot could find a
purchaser possessor
nor therefore a
purchaser.

1. To begin with such immoveable restating of which the Among moveables, let us begin with such articles of
those sorts, of which the value is most compleatly intrinsic and independent of fancy.
Stock of all in all shapes: husbandry stock; fishing
stocks mining stock, for a fishing stock, manufacturing stock, shipping
stock, equipments/furniture:. { ships navigable vessels themselves included or not included.
{ No article the value of which exceeds the value
of the that of all mans share in the the lot
of the equal lot or rather of the moveable portion of it, if it
aggregate mass included as property in both shapes can consistently, with the supposition
remain in the hand of any one: either then it
must be taken at a value less than that of an entire
lot as just described, or it must be destroyed, or it may
what comes to the same thing it must remain unoccupied.
Corn, hay Of all farms the of such size that their
husbandry exceeds what is called Cottage husbandry the
stock must be divided: the barns, granaries,stables &c in which it
is housed, with this except, if any thing, except if a small corner of each
of it was useless be valueless because useless. Oxen

27
Ex gr. No article
in husbandry
on a scale exceeding
Cottage &c
or Spade husbandry.
Barns,
Granary, stable &c.
& A horse would
be to be eaten,
the average equal lot
not affording wherewithal
to keep it.
Such the value of a
horse now worth
£2,000 for breeding

Cows Oxen, Sheep
and Pigs Swine will retain for a time their value, because they
may at any time be killed and eaten. Horses will have
not retain their value for altogether/then only unless they too should be until they came to be used as an
article of food, which, with regard to such of them as remained alive, would
infallibly be the case: for, in addition to what would be
necessary for immediate subsistence, no mans lot would
include what is necessary for the maintenance of a
horse. A horse bought t'other day at the price of £1,000 or £2,000 would not indeed lose all his value: for he would be worth what retain that
he would be worth to be : which he would in free food possess as an article of food. : but he would replace be worth no
other part of his value.

28
Terms and plans for
the division what?
all remainder would
be to be destroyed or
consumed at the time
as sale would, as
above be impossible.

Say now who can, how at in what particular way place places and times the articles
of stock, live and dead, would be to be collected together for the purposes
of being thus divided parcelled out: and in what particular places and numbers the individuals
individuals would
be to be collected for
the purpose of receiving
each their lot: and
since cattle a four-footed
beast can not
as a polypar does, live
after being cut to pieces, what is to be done with the remainders resulting from the division of the number of each sort of article by the number of
the sharers as also what where as between one lot and another, the numbers of the cattle in question are the same, as between sharee and sharer [+]
[+] how it is, and by whom, that compensation
is to be made for
differences between value and valuer

Identifier: | JB/137/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.
Date_1	1819-11-23	Marginal Summary Numbering	26-28
Box	137	Main Headings	radicalism not dangerous
Folio number	112	Info in main headings field	radicalism not
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	arthur wellesley, duke of wellington
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1816
Notes public		ID Number	46829
Box Contents