★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<p>After this major and <del>all</del> <add>all-embracing impossibility</add> <del>comprehensive difficulty, it</del><lb/> | <p>After this major and <del>all</del> <add>all-embracing impossibility</add> <del>comprehensive difficulty, it</del><lb/> | ||
<add>a man we may without much difficulty stand excused <del>ba<gap/> of the</del></add> <del>one man will be excused from | <add>a man we may without much difficulty stand excused <del>ba<gap/> of the</del></add> <del>one man will be excused from dwelling on <gap/> difficulties</del><lb/> | ||
<add>from touching <del>other</del> any further than in the way of allusion, or bars <del>of</del> narrower in<lb/> | <add>from touching <del>other</del> any further than in the way of allusion, or bars <del>of</del> narrower in<lb/> | ||
extent and similar <lb/> | extent and similar <lb/> | ||
in <del>natu</del> nature.</add> <del>from nature and strengthen and nature on <gap/> | in <del>natu</del> nature.</add> <del>from nature and strengthen and nature on <gap/> narrow but</del><lb/> | ||
of</p> | of</p> | ||
<p>1. <hi rend="underline">Sex</hi> <add>and <hi rend="underline">conditions</hi></add> Females shall they, <add>or shall they not,</add> share with males? married with<lb/> | <p>1. <hi rend="underline">Sex</hi> <add>and <hi rend="underline">conditions</hi></add> Females shall they, <add>or shall they not,</add> share with males? married with<lb/> | ||
single? <add>A</add> female past child bearing shall she have the same share as<lb/> | single? <add>A</add> female past child bearing shall she have the same share as<lb/> | ||
one marriageable, and on marriage capable of having children in <del>any number?</del> | one marriageable, and on marriage capable of having children in <del>any number?</del> an unlimited number?</p> | ||
<p>2. <hi rend="underline">Age</hi>. Non-Adults shall they share with adults? at what<lb/> | <p>2. <hi rend="underline">Age</hi>. Non-Adults shall they share with adults? at what<lb/> | ||
age? | age? on birth or at what later age?</p> | ||
<p>3. <add><hi rend="underline">Parentage</hi></add> Non adults, at birth is taken - shall <del>be</del> illegitimate <lb/> | <p>3. <add><hi rend="underline">Parentage</hi></add> Non adults, at birth is taken - shall <del>be</del> illegitimate <lb/> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
between family and family? But, in this case <unclear>who</unclear> shares<lb/> | between family and family? But, in this case <unclear>who</unclear> shares<lb/> | ||
being equal <add>as between family and family, where would be the substantial equality,<lb/>which one of the families</add> <del>above would be the inequality who</del> are family<lb/> | being equal <add>as between family and family, where would be the substantial equality,<lb/>which one of the families</add> <del>above would be the inequality who</del> are family<lb/> | ||
<del>containing but two</del><add>contained but two individuals</add> and another twenty? And, those who | <del>containing but two</del><add>contained but two individuals</add> and another twenty? And, those who belonged<lb/> | ||
to one family, what would their part be?</p> | |||
<p>5. The <del> | <p>5. The <del>exist</del> set of properties, existing <add>in that character</add>at the commencement<lb/> | ||
of the process, would they be to be admitted into the list of <del>shar</del><lb/> | of the process, would they be to be admitted into the list of <del>shar</del><lb/> | ||
sharers? or, in punishment for their <add>long reign of</add> <del>long reign of</del> injustice,< | sharers? or, in punishment for their <add>long reign of</add> <del>long reign of</del> injustice,<lb/> | ||
would they be to be excluded and left to | would they be to be excluded and left to starve? Not that in<lb/> | ||
this respect <del>they</del><add>thus</add> let would <add>it has been <del><gap/></del> seen) be in any determinate</add> <del>be in any</del> degree worse than that<lb/> | this respect <del>they</del><add>thus</add> let would <add>it has been <del><gap/></del> seen) be in any determinate</add> <del>be in any</del> degree worse than that<lb/> | ||
of their | of their monopolizing <add><del>plundering</del></add> <del>adversaries, the share</del> conquerors and<lb/> | ||
plunderers — the sharers.</p> | plunderers — the sharers.</p> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1819 Dec 24
Radicalism not dangerous
II Nature of the case
2 §:35.V Sharers indeterminable
After this major and all all-embracing impossibility comprehensive difficulty, it
a man we may without much difficulty stand excused ba of the one man will be excused from dwelling on difficulties
from touching other any further than in the way of allusion, or bars of narrower in
extent and similar
in natu nature. from nature and strengthen and nature on narrow but
of
1. Sex and conditions Females shall they, or shall they not, share with males? married with
single? A female past child bearing shall she have the same share as
one marriageable, and on marriage capable of having children in any number? an unlimited number?
2. Age. Non-Adults shall they share with adults? at what
age? on birth or at what later age?
3. Parentage Non adults, at birth is taken - shall be illegitimate
share with legitimate? If by coming into the world each illegitimate child
forces a fresh division, what an encouragement this far begetting lines? If not, what is to
become of him?
4. To clear the plan of from escape from difficulties , shall the sharing be not
amongst individual between individual and individual, but
between family and family? But, in this case who shares
being equal as between family and family, where would be the substantial equality,
which one of the families above would be the inequality who are family
containing but twocontained but two individuals and another twenty? And, those who belonged
to one family, what would their part be?
5. The exist set of properties, existing in that characterat the commencement
of the process, would they be to be admitted into the list of shar
sharers? or, in punishment for their long reign of long reign of injustice,
would they be to be excluded and left to starve? Not that in
this respect theythus let would it has been seen) be in any determinate be in any degree worse than that
of their monopolizing plundering adversaries, the share conquerors and
plunderers — the sharers.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1819-12-24 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
121 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1816 |
|||
|
46838 |
|||
