JB/137/349/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/349/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 29<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>5 <note>Note<lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(4) (3) (<gap/>) 5</p> <!-- in pencil --><p><note>or 10<lb/>In U.S. [present<lb/>number of States<lb/>22)  Representative<lb/>Democracy has reigned<lb/>40 years: property<lb/><gap/> and<lb/>moveable remaining<lb/>undisturbed, in all<lb/>degrees of inequality<lb/>from 0 to many<lb/>hundreds of thousands<lb/>No scheme of <gap/><lb/>division ever proposed<lb/>Property in no shape</note></p> <p>Property life <gap/> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> are <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> against <gap/>.</del></p> <!-- all text up to the Note crossed out --> <p><del>In the American United States <gap/> present <gap/><lb/>of their 22 Democracy Representative <gap/> have <gap/><lb/>for <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> property <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>as <gap/> having place in all degrees of inequality<lb/>from the rate of measure of value up to <gap/><lb/>hundreds of thousands.  In all <gap/> <gap/> have any <gap/<lb/>scheme of <add>forced</add> division, <gap/> <gap/> of equality, <gap/></del> a<lb/>practical been attempted or proposed <add>by any one</add> to be carried into<lb/>effect?  No never.  <del><gap/></del> in any place <add>state</add>, at any time<lb/>his property in either design been less secure, the<lb/>possession of it less tranquil, then in <del>England</del> Great Britain:<lb/>not to speak of Ireland.  No indeed.</p> <p><del>Well in the United States what is the system of<lb/>Government?  Answer &#x2014; Secrecy, <gap/> virtual universality<lb/>equality and <sic>annuality</sic> of  <gap/></del></p> <p><note><del>The four cardinal<lb/>points are exactly<lb/>as here proposed</del></note></p> <p>Note</p> <p><foreign><hi rend="underline">Rident</hi>! <hi rend="underline">rident</hi></foreign> with the voice of Shuter<unclear></unclear>, cries the word<lb/>pronounced by <del>the</del> D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King the Jacobite Civilian whose <add>the</add><lb/>Memoirs <add>author of the Memoirs</add>   
<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 29<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>5 <note>Note<lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(4) (3) (<gap/>) 5</p> <!-- in pencil --><p><note>or 10<lb/>In U.S. [present<lb/>number of States<lb/>22)  Representative<lb/>Democracy has reigned<lb/>40 years: property<lb/>immoveable and<lb/>moveable remaining<lb/>undisturbed, in all<lb/>degrees of inequality<lb/>from 0 to many<lb/>hundreds of thousands<lb/>No scheme of forced<lb/>division ever proposed<lb/>Property in no shape</note></p> <p><del>Property life <gap/> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> are <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> against <gap/>.</del></p> <!-- all text up to the Note crossed out --> <p><del>In the American United States <gap/> present number<lb/>of their 22 Democracy Representative <gap/> have <gap/><lb/>for immoveable but <gap/> property immoveable as well<lb/>as moveable having place in all degrees of inequality<lb/>from the rate of measure of value up to <gap/><lb/>hundreds of thousands.  In all this time have any such<lb/>scheme of <add>forced</add> division, <gap/> <gap/> of equality, <gap/></del> or<lb/>practical been attempted or proposed <add>by any one</add> to be carried into<lb/>effect?  No never.  <del><gap/></del> In any place <add>state</add>, at any time<lb/>has property in either design been less secure, the<lb/>possession of it less tranquil, then in <del>England</del> Great Britain:<lb/>not to speak of Ireland.  No indeed.</p> <p><del>Well in the United States what is the system of<lb/>Government?  Answer &#x2014; Secrecy, <gap/> virtual universality<lb/>equality and <sic>annuality</sic> of  <gap/></del></p> <p><note><del>The four cardinal<lb/>points are exactly<lb/>as here proposed</del></note></p> <p>Note</p> <p><foreign><hi rend="underline">Rident</hi>! <hi rend="underline">rident</hi></foreign> with the voice of Senator<unclear></unclear>, cries the word<lb/>pronounced by <del>the</del> D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King the Jacobite Civilian whose <add>the</add><lb/>Memoirs <add>author of the Memoirs</add> we have from one of the Tribunes in<lb/>the Oxford Theatre at the installation of the Earl of<lb/>Westmoreland as Chancellor in the Years 1759.  A<lb/>thunder of applause supplied the nominative case: it<lb/>still tingles in my <del><gap/></del> ears.  This was <del>in the <gap/></del> not<lb/>so much as the years after the last attempt at return<lb/>made by the Stuarts, George the second still alive and<lb/><del>hearty.</del> <add>hearty.  The <foreign>coup de theatre</foreign> was probably prepared</add>  Latin, the language of the place, was <add>an</add> essential<lb/><del>to this <gap/> of ingenious Pr&aelig;tory instrument.  When the <gap/></del> <add>instrument, English could not have been employed without saying <hi rend="underline">he</hi> is <hi rend="underline">it</hi></add><lb/>forfeiting the benefit of the necessary ambiguity.  When the<lb/>thunder had ceased the <foreign><hi rend="underline">rident</hi></foreign> was succeeded by some vague<lb/>description of <del><gap/></del> departed felicity, of which <foreign><hi rend="underline">illi dies</hi></foreign> were<lb/>the first words &#x2014; may it return: that day.</p>     






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:32, 28 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 29
Radicalism not dangerous

5 Note
III Experience
II Ireland

(4) (3) () 5

or 10
In U.S. [present
number of States
22) Representative
Democracy has reigned
40 years: property
immoveable and
moveable remaining
undisturbed, in all
degrees of inequality
from 0 to many
hundreds of thousands
No scheme of forced
division ever proposed
Property in no shape

Property life the are
against .

In the American United States present number
of their 22 Democracy Representative have
for immoveable but property immoveable as well
as moveable having place in all degrees of inequality
from the rate of measure of value up to
hundreds of thousands. In all this time have any such
scheme of forced division, of equality,
or
practical been attempted or proposed by any one to be carried into
effect? No never. In any place state, at any time
has property in either design been less secure, the
possession of it less tranquil, then in England Great Britain:
not to speak of Ireland. No indeed.

Well in the United States what is the system of
Government? Answer — Secrecy, virtual universality
equality and annuality of

The four cardinal
points are exactly
as here proposed

Note

Rident! rident with the voice of Senator, cries the word
pronounced by the Dr King the Jacobite Civilian whose the
Memoirs author of the Memoirs we have from one of the Tribunes in
the Oxford Theatre at the installation of the Earl of
Westmoreland as Chancellor in the Years 1759. A
thunder of applause supplied the nominative case: it
still tingles in my ears. This was in the not
so much as the years after the last attempt at return
made by the Stuarts, George the second still alive and
hearty. hearty. The coup de theatre was probably prepared Latin, the language of the place, was an essential
to this of ingenious Prætory instrument. When the instrument, English could not have been employed without saying he is it
forfeiting the benefit of the necessary ambiguity. When the
thunder had ceased the rident was succeeded by some vague
description of departed felicity, of which illi dies were
the first words — may it return: that day.




Identifier: | JB/137/349/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 10

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

349

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47066

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in