JB/137/124/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/124/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1819 Dec. 29</p>
<head>Radicalism not dangerous</head>


<note><!-- Pencil note -->II. Nature of the case<lb/>
3 &sect;.7. VII Other spoliation impossible</note><lb/>
<p>Let us see then whether to the multitude judging each for himself,<lb/>
<add>it be possible that</add> any other imaginable plan <add>should afford <del>a prospect of</del> any better promise than the </add> <del>and those remaining two imaginable</del> <note>those which have been brought<lb/>
to view and disposed of:<lb/>
this being at the same time<lb/>
understood, that there<lb/>
remains not any other<lb/>
the effect of which would<lb/>
not be the <del>affe</del> narrowing<lb/>
the number of the<lb/>
sharers.</note><lb/>
<add><del>plan but that the effect of which would not be</del></add> In the case where all <add>individuals without exception are proposed</add> <del>not</del> to be sharer or sharers <del>what</del> <note><!-- Pencil note --><del>3</del>4<lb/>
2<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/><lb/>
would set <add>up </add> in <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
Of itself, opposition of the<lb/>
<del>be</del> constituted authorities<lb/>
would be sufficient<lb/>
To that would be added<lb/>
the force of every individual<lb/>
excluded.<lb/>
The fewer the executed<lb/>
the less the saving:<lb/>
the more, the greater <lb/>
the resistance</note><lb/>
to an amount more determinate, conceivable  and <add>clearly </add> expressible<lb/>
than any other &#x2014; we have seen what the <add>bars</add> <del>ab<gap/>
</del> are that<lb/>
oppose themselves. But to any plan <add>from <del><gap/></del> the <del>by</del> benefit of which,</add> <del>which <gap/> <gap/> any</del><lb/>
<add>individuals of any description should stand excluded: the authors exclusive</add><del>should be included from <unclear>participatory</unclear></del> here <del>could <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>would <del>oppose</del> be opposing an</add> additional obstacle. In any vitro which could be taken<lb/>
of the case by any the  most sanguine imagination,<del> the</del> the<lb/>
obstacles  <add>that could not be </add> opposed to the plan.  <del>by the opposition that <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>not <gap/> made</del> by <add>all</add> <del>the</del> constituted authorities will<lb/>
their adherents, <del>cost</del> could not but present themselves<lb/>
as sufficiently formidable. But, on this  supposition of a <lb/>
scheme <del>of <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del> narrowed by</add> exclusion, every individual  excluded<lb/>
would add to the drea<gap/>ble of the obstacles that oppose themselves<lb/>
of all comprehensive <add>benefit.</add> <del>advantage</del>. <add>Here then comes <del>the</del><add>a</add> dilemma,</add> Let the excluded<lb/>
be few, the saving by the exclusion <del>would</del> will be so<lb/>
much the less.  <del><gap/></del> Let <add>the</add> excluded be many, the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
force of resistance. <del>the reaching<add>resisting</add> <gap/> in addition</del> <add>added</add> to that <del>of</del> <add>of</add> the<lb/>
constituted authorities will be so <del>mor</del> much the greater.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:34, 5 October 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec. 29

Radicalism not dangerous

II. Nature of the case
3 §.7. VII Other spoliation impossible

Let us see then whether to the multitude judging each for himself,
it be possible that any other imaginable plan should afford a prospect of any better promise than the and those remaining two imaginable those which have been brought
to view and disposed of:
this being at the same time
understood, that there
remains not any other
the effect of which would
not be the affe narrowing
the number of the
sharers.

plan but that the effect of which would not be In the case where all individuals without exception are proposed not to be sharer or sharers what 34
2

would set up in
Of itself, opposition of the
be constituted authorities
would be sufficient
To that would be added
the force of every individual
excluded.
The fewer the executed
the less the saving:
the more, the greater
the resistance

to an amount more determinate, conceivable and clearly expressible
than any other — we have seen what the bars ab are that
oppose themselves. But to any plan from the by benefit of which, which any
individuals of any description should stand excluded: the authors exclusiveshould be included from participatory here could
would oppose be opposing an additional obstacle. In any vitro which could be taken
of the case by any the most sanguine imagination, the the
obstacles that could not be opposed to the plan. by the opposition that
not made by all the constituted authorities will
their adherents, cost could not but present themselves
as sufficiently formidable. But, on this supposition of a
scheme of narrowed by exclusion, every individual excluded
would add to the dreable of the obstacles that oppose themselves
of all comprehensive benefit. advantage. Here then comes the<add>a dilemma,</add> Let the excluded
be few, the saving by the exclusion would will be so
much the less. Let the excluded be many, the
force of resistance. the reachingresisting in addition added to that of of the
constituted authorities will be so mor much the greater.



Identifier: | JB/137/124/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

4

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

124

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

46841

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in