★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1819 Dec.17</head> | ||
<head>Radicalism not dangerous</head> | |||
<note><!-- pencil note -->ult<lb/>II Nature of the case<lb/> | |||
§.10.Sp<gap/> the p<gap/><lb/> | |||
or 1<lb/> | |||
Antiradicalists. By<lb/> | |||
radicalists, sponge<lb/> | |||
declared a desirable<lb/> | |||
result: here would be<lb/> | |||
subversive of rights of<lb/> | |||
property</note><lb/> | |||
<head>Sponge</head> | |||
<p><add>But by</add> <del>By</del> radicalists (<del>it may be said</del><add>says somebody</add>) <add>a wish to see <del>the</del> a National</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> of the national</del><gap/><lb/> | |||
<add>bankruptcy effected — or as the phrase is, a sponge applied to the</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> on the part of government by <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<add>debt, has at radical reform meetings been openly and uncontradictedly spoken of</add> <del>in some places been <gap/> <gap/> radical reform,</del><lb/> | |||
<add>in the character of a desirable result:</add> and here <del><gap/></del> would unquestionably be subversion of <lb/> | |||
<add>is</add> rights of property.</p> | |||
<note><!-- pencil note -->or 2<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <del><gap/></del> In<lb/> | |||
some instances yes,<lb/> | |||
but rather as are<lb/> | |||
expected cause of reform<lb/> | |||
there an intended office</note><lb/> | |||
<p>To this come <add>will</add> the following short answers<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> <del>Associated with it: yes:</del><add><del>in some instances</del><del>Answer</del></add> <del>but <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> rather</del><lb/> | |||
<del>a probable cause rather than as one effect <add>a consequence a consequence</add></del> an effect<lb/> | |||
1. Spoken of in such meetings, yes. But how? — Rather <lb/> | |||
<del>intended to be paid <gap/> <gap/></del> as an expected cause of reform<lb/> | |||
than an intended effect <del><gap/></del> No otherwise than in so <del>few</del> as it<lb/> | |||
has been declared to be an enhanced effect, does it apply to the <add>present</add> purpose.|</p> | |||
<p>2. Even, supposing it intended to be produced, and produced<lb/> | |||
accordingly it would not amount to the design<lb/> | |||
<del>the suppose</del> insinuated in the Speech <del><gap/> the design</del><lb/> | |||
<del>the supposed <gap/> of which <gap/> formed the basis of those men.</del> <note><add>[+]</add> Note well, that<lb/> | |||
Subversion - not<lb/> | |||
of "<hi rend="underline">rights of property"</hi><lb/> | |||
<gap/> some rights of property<lb/> | |||
but of <hi rend="underline">"the"</hi> rights<lb/> | |||
"of property", sets all<lb/> | |||
the rights of property<lb/> | |||
in the object charged<lb/> | |||
to be accused at. Every<lb/> | |||
time a handkerchief<lb/> | |||
is <del><gap/></del> picked out of a pocket<lb/> | |||
subversion of rights of<lb/> | |||
property <del>but</del><add>takes</add> place<lb/></note> | |||
<del>more by which the constitution has been subverted. By</del><lb/> | |||
<add>True it is that, to</add>the amount of this debt, so much <add>of the rights of </add> property in that shape<lb/> | |||
would be subverted: but property in all other shapes<lb/> | |||
would, for any thing that this would do remain untouched<del>[+]</del>.</p> | |||
<note>or 3<lb/> | |||
2. If produced it<lb/> | |||
would not be what is<lb/> | |||
charged subversion of <lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">the</hi> rights of property</note><lb/> | |||
<p>3. The very danger, <add>whether in itself it be </add> useful or pernicious, <del><gap/></del> proven<lb/> | |||
in <add>even</add> in respect for property in all other shapes. For what would<lb/> | |||
to <add>the</add> effect or supposed use of it? only to <del>case</del> take off<lb/> | |||
so much burthen so much of deduction <del><gap/></del> from property in<lb/> | |||
<del>all other shapes</del> <add>in all other shapes: deduction, namely that made by taxes.</add> Suppose property, in all other shapes. <note>Note likewise, that<lb/> | |||
<del>though of</del> from the aggregate<lb/> | |||
mass of property<lb/> | |||
in the country, though<lb/> | |||
no addition would be<lb/> | |||
made to it, so <unclear>desalcation</unclear><lb/> | |||
would be made<lb/> | |||
I do <gap/> not any that<lb/> | |||
no preponderant evil <lb/> | |||
would be produced. But<lb/> | |||
that is another consideration<lb/> | |||
which will meet us<lb/> | |||
presently<lb/> | |||
—<lb/></note><lb/> | |||
dealt by, according to <del>the Prince's Reports supposition</del> that<lb/> | |||
design the existence of which was in the Speech <del>pretended</del><add>declared</add> to<lb/> | |||
be believed, it has been seen what would <add>have</add> become of it<lb/> | |||
and whether , <del>a spe</del> by the very partition, the <del>a</del> impossibility<lb/> | |||
of paying the debt, and thereby the <add>virtual</add> abolition of<lb/> | |||
it would not have been effected. But that no such design<lb/> | |||
of universal partition can possibly have been entertained has it is h<gap/>ed been sufficiently proved. [</p> | |||
<p>4. To <del><gap/></del> no one of the supposed plotters in question would or<lb/> | |||
could any immediate benefit be produced by this sponge. Ceasing to<lb/> | |||
pay dividends to the present accountants would not put money into the pocket<lb/> | |||
of any reformist, or any one else. Suppose the <add>dividends deviated among the</add> <del>radicalists</del> reformists <del>to be put</del><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> that <gap/></del> <add>instant</add> of the present an <gap/>; is that what is meant? But in this supposition the debt would<lb/> | |||
not be abolished; it would be<lb/> | |||
kept up. [</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1819 Dec.17 Radicalism not dangerous
ult
II Nature of the case
§.10.Sp the p
or 1
Antiradicalists. By
radicalists, sponge
declared a desirable
result: here would be
subversive of rights of
property
Sponge
But by By radicalists (it may be saidsays somebody) a wish to see the a National of the national
bankruptcy effected — or as the phrase is, a sponge applied to the on the part of government by
debt, has at radical reform meetings been openly and uncontradictedly spoken of in some places been radical reform,
in the character of a desirable result: and here would unquestionably be subversion of
is rights of property.
or 2
In
some instances yes,
but rather as are
expected cause of reform
there an intended office
To this come will the following short answers
Associated with it: yes:in some instancesAnswer but rather
a probable cause rather than as one effect a consequence a consequence an effect
1. Spoken of in such meetings, yes. But how? — Rather
intended to be paid as an expected cause of reform
than an intended effect No otherwise than in so few as it
has been declared to be an enhanced effect, does it apply to the present purpose.|
2. Even, supposing it intended to be produced, and produced
accordingly it would not amount to the design
the suppose insinuated in the Speech the design
the supposed of which formed the basis of those men. [+] Note well, that
Subversion - not
of "rights of property"
some rights of property
but of "the" rights
"of property", sets all
the rights of property
in the object charged
to be accused at. Every
time a handkerchief
is picked out of a pocket
subversion of rights of
property buttakes place
more by which the constitution has been subverted. By
True it is that, tothe amount of this debt, so much of the rights of property in that shape
would be subverted: but property in all other shapes
would, for any thing that this would do remain untouched[+].
or 3
2. If produced it
would not be what is
charged subversion of
the rights of property
3. The very danger, whether in itself it be useful or pernicious, proven
in even in respect for property in all other shapes. For what would
to the effect or supposed use of it? only to case take off
so much burthen so much of deduction from property in
all other shapes in all other shapes: deduction, namely that made by taxes. Suppose property, in all other shapes. Note likewise, that
though of from the aggregate
mass of property
in the country, though
no addition would be
made to it, so desalcation
would be made
I do not any that
no preponderant evil
would be produced. But
that is another consideration
which will meet us
presently
—
dealt by, according to the Prince's Reports supposition that
design the existence of which was in the Speech pretendeddeclared to
be believed, it has been seen what would have become of it
and whether , a spe by the very partition, the a impossibility
of paying the debt, and thereby the virtual abolition of
it would not have been effected. But that no such design
of universal partition can possibly have been entertained has it is hed been sufficiently proved. [
4. To no one of the supposed plotters in question would or
could any immediate benefit be produced by this sponge. Ceasing to
pay dividends to the present accountants would not put money into the pocket
of any reformist, or any one else. Suppose the dividends deviated among the radicalists reformists to be put
that instant of the present an ; is that what is meant? But in this supposition the debt would
not be abolished; it would be
kept up. [
Identifier: | JB/137/133/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1819-12-17 |
or 1 - or 4 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
133 |
radicalism not |
||
001 |
spunge |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 / d1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1818 |
|||
46850 |
|||