JB/137/125/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/125/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
case.</note><lb/>
case.</note><lb/>


&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>(3) scandals<lb/>
<p>(3) scandal<gap/><lb/>
In  matter have A a <gap/> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
In  matter have A a <gap/> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
[+] <gap/> leaf <gap/> made &sect;.2 Immoveables improbables<lb/>
[+] <gap/> leaf <gap/> made &sect;.2 Immoveables <gap/><lb/>
In no such business can any thing be so much a<lb/>
In no such business can any thing be so much as<lb/>
begin <gap/> without some previous danger, good <gap/> will<lb/>
begin <gap/> without some previous danger, good or <gap/>, well<lb/>
<gap/> or its arranged</p>
arranged or ill arranged</p>
 
<note>the <del>accomplishment of abridged</del><lb/>
Every conceivable plan <gap/> <gap/> by mischief  in question<lb/>
<del>the subversion of the rights of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>investment danger of</del> <add><del><gap/> <gap/></del></add> <del>it would <gap/></del> disposed of</note><lb/>


<p>Accordingly the design first supposed is that of equal<lb/>
<p>Accordingly the design first supposed is that of equal<lb/>
Line 32: Line 36:
all the several members of the community in the character <add><del>the</del> company</add></p>
all the several members of the community in the character <add><del>the</del> company</add></p>


<p>In a<add>the</add> design thus described were necessariy comprehend<lb/>
<p>In a<add>the</add> design thus described were necessarily comprehend<lb/>
<gap/> the topics following namely v. <gap/> what<lb/>
the topics following namely 1. Proportion what<lb/>
<gap/> also who. 3. Subject makes of partition what.<lb/>
2. Sharers who. 3. Subject matter of partition what.<lb/>
<gap/> Not a step shall be as able to <gap/> without finding once<lb/>
Not a step shall be as able to <gap/> without finding ourselves<lb/>
<gap/> stopped by impossibilities by dissembling improbable.</p>
stopped by impossibilities by dissembling improbable.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>


<note><del>4</del>5<lb/>
<note><del>4</del>5<lb/>
Line 46: Line 49:
What then did you mean?</note><lb/>
What then did you mean?</note><lb/>


<gap/> 25 dec 1819 Quere where to imply what <gap/> here or <gap/><lb/>
<p>&#9758; 25 Dec 1819 Quere where to imply what follows? here or elsewhere?</p>


<p>At every step the description <add>has taken </add> <del><gap/></del> takes, anti radicalistst<lb/>
<p>At every step the description <add>has taken </add> <del><gap/></del> takes, anti radicalist<lb/>
readers, if any such it should have, will <add>of course have been</add> <del>be</del> turning<lb/>
readers, if any such it should have, will <add>of course have been</add> <del>be</del> turning and<lb/>
from it with disgust, and <add>exclaiming &#x2014;</add> <del>crying</del> &#x2014; We did not mean this<lb/>
from it with disgust, and <add>exclaiming &#x2014;</add> <del>crying</del> &#x2014; We did not mean this<lb/>
"we did not mean <gap/>, <del>all</del> we did not mean may they<lb/>
"we did not mean that, <del>all</del> we did not mean may they<lb/>
"of all this &#x2014; <add><del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> have</del><add>can it ever have been your belief </add></add> <del>how <gap/> it be supposed</del> that any thing <del>that</del><lb/>
"of all this &#x2014; <add><del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> have</del> can it ever have been your belief</add> <del>how <gap/> it be supposed</del> that any thing <del>that</del><lb/>
"so palpably absurd could have been meant by any body?</p>
"so palpably absurd could have been meant by any body?</p>


<p>Will then if you did not mean this <gap/> when did you<lb/>
<p>Well then if you did not mean this what did you<lb/>
mean? do you know what it is you mean? <add>have you</add> <del>you</del><lb/>
mean? do you know what it is you mean? <add>have you</add> <del>you</del><lb/>
at any time known what it was you meant? You, by whom, in <note>evert the most offensive<lb/>
at any time known what it was you meant? You, by whom, in <note>every the most offensive<lb/>
shape you could find<lb/>
shape you could find<lb/>
opprobium had for<lb/>
opprobium had for<lb/>
Line 72: Line 75:
<add>and even</add> <del><gap/> of</del> high rank &#x2014; which to you is every thing</p>
<add>and even</add> <del><gap/> of</del> high rank &#x2014; which to you is every thing</p>


<p>Say <del>what</del><add>then</add> at length what it is you mean! <del><gap/></del><add>speak out , or</add> by that sort of evidence<lb/>
<p>Say <del>what</del><add>then</add> at length what it is you mean! <del><gap/></del><add>speak out , or</add> <note>by that sort of evidence<lb/>
which if even form men<lb/>
which if even form men<lb/>
whose declaration is worth<lb/>
whose declaration is worth<lb/>
nothing is more conlusive<lb/>
nothing is more conclusive<lb/>
than it is in the<lb/>
than it is in the<lb/>
person o<lb/>f any declaration<lb/>
person of<lb/>  
any declaration<lb/>
from any man<lb/>
from any man<lb/>
ever to be &#x2014; prove, in <lb/>
ever to be &#x2014; prove, in <lb/>
a word, by silence on occasion,</note><lb/>  
a word, by silence on occasion,</note><lb/>  
by <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add><del>by the same <gap/></del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>by <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add><del>by the same <gap/></del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>spoke of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del>, in this <del>dealin</del><del>dealing</del> by <del><gap/></del> us)<lb/>
<del>spoke of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del>, in this <del>dealin</del><add>dealing</add> by <del><gap/></del> us)<lb/>
you have <del>taken</del> <add><del><gap/></del> all along been talking</add> without meaning, and <add>acting</add> <del>acted</del> as accused without ground.]</p>
you have <del>taken</del> <add><del><gap/></del> all along been talking</add> without meaning, and <add>acting</add> <del>acted</del> as accused without ground.]</p>


Line 89: Line 93:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:13, 5 October 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec 9

Radicalism

II Nature of the case
§.7. Other spoliation
Of all conceivable
plan of subversion
& the execution
being thus proved
to be impossible,
challenge to antiradicalists
to produce
one which
will not upon the
face of it be seen
to be in the same
case.

(3) scandals
In matter have A a
[+] leaf made §.2 Immoveables
In no such business can any thing be so much as
begin without some previous danger, good or , well
arranged or ill arranged

the accomplishment of abridged
Every conceivable plan by mischief in question
the subversion of the rights of
investment danger of it would disposed of

Accordingly the design first supposed is that of equal
of property among exibly equal and among
all the several members of the community in the character the company

In athe design thus described were necessarily comprehend
the topics following namely 1. Proportion what
2. Sharers who. 3. Subject matter of partition what.
Not a step shall be as able to without finding ourselves
stopped by impossibilities by dissembling improbable.

45
At such impossibility
"nonsense. I could you
"think I meant this?"
cries the anitradicalist.
What then did you mean?

☞ 25 Dec 1819 Quere where to imply what follows? here or elsewhere?

At every step the description has taken takes, anti radicalist
readers, if any such it should have, will of course have been be turning and
from it with disgust, and exclaiming — crying — We did not mean this
"we did not mean that, all we did not mean may they
"of all this — have can it ever have been your belief how it be supposed that any thing that
"so palpably absurd could have been meant by any body?

Well then if you did not mean this what did you
mean? do you know what it is you mean? have you you
at any time known what it was you meant? You, by whom, in every the most offensive
shape you could find
opprobium had for
so many years been
poured forth - poured
forth, not only upon
such multitudes

by ab supposed
but for the most offensive shape you could find
forth not only upon such numbers multitudes which to you
is nothing but upo not only upon such
much moral worth — which to you is again in as nothing — but
upon so money more of of much pecuniary worth
and even of high rank — which to you is every thing

Say whatthen at length what it is you mean! speak out , or by that sort of evidence
which if even form men
whose declaration is worth
nothing is more conclusive
than it is in the
person of
any declaration
from any man
ever to be — prove, in
a word, by silence on occasion,

by by the same
spoke of , in this dealindealing by us)
you have taken all along been talking without meaning, and acting acted as accused without ground.]




Identifier: | JB/137/125/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

125

Info in main headings field

radicalism

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46842

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in