JB/087/031/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/031/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
<head>6</head>
<head>6</head>


<note>Expedients for <lb/>the discovery of <lb/>the person of the<lb/> offender:<lb/>  Expedient 1. <lb/><del>6</del> <add>1</add> .  Seizure of his <lb/><lb/>person  <hi rend="underline"><foreign>pro re <lb/>nata</foreign></hi><lb/>It could be a defect</note>
<note>Expedients for <lb/>the discovery of <lb/>the person of the<lb/> offender:<lb/>  Expedient 1. <lb/><del>6</del> <add>1</add>.  Seizure of his <lb/>person  <hi rend="underline"><foreign>pro re <lb/>nata</foreign></hi><lb/>It would be a defect</note>


<p>It is evident enough that of all expedients for<lb/>this purpose the most effectual is that of seizing<lb/>the person of the supposed offender and thenceforward<lb/>keeping him always in <del>so</del> a determinate place or<lb/>the custody of a determinate person or persons till<lb/>the occasions arise [on which it is requisite he <add>which call for him to be</add><lb/>should be] recognized.  But this expedient is liable<lb/>to two objections:  If it is <del><gap/></del> oftentimes <add>very commonly</add> <hi rend="underline">impracticable</hi>:<lb/> and in point of inconvenience to the supposed offender it is <hi rend="underline">expensive</hi>: 1, It is <add>As to it's being</add> very commonly<lb/><lb/>impracticable: this it must always be, where<lb/>the <del>person</del> <add>party</add> who detects is not either by himself<lb/>or by such assistance as <add>he</add> can collect<del>ed</del> on the<lb/>spot, superior in point of strength and that to a<lb/>considerable degree to the party who is detected.  2.<lb/>In point of inconvenience to the supposed offender<lb/>it is expensive.  In slight cases it will often exceed <note>even supposing the <lb/>party to be guilty<lb/></note>the quantum of suffering proper to be inflicted <add>on a man</add> in<lb/>the way of punishment, in the event of his proving<lb/>guilty:  and as yet it is not determined but that <add>appear ascertained that he </add><lb/>he may be <add>is not</add> innocent.  These considerations make it<lb/>necessary to look not for expedients of a more practicable<lb/>and milder nature.<lb/></p>  
<p>It is evident enough that of all expedients for<lb/>this purpose the most effectual is that of seizing<lb/>the person of the supposed offender and thenceforward<lb/>keeping him always in <del>an</del> a determinate place or<lb/>the custody of a determinate person or persons till<lb/>the occasions arise [on which it is requisite he <add>which call for him to be</add><lb/>should be] recognized.  But this expedient is liable<lb/>to two objections:  <del>If</del> it is <del>inelig</del> oftentimes <add>very commonly</add> <hi rend="underline">impracticable</hi>:<lb/> and in point of inconvenience to the supposed offender it is <hi rend="underline">expensive</hi>: 1. It is <add>As to it's being</add> very commonly<lb/>impracticable: this it must always be, where<lb/>the <del>person</del> <add>party</add> who detects is not either by himself<lb/>or by such assistance as <add>he</add> can collect<del>ed</del> on the<lb/>spot, superior in point of strength and that to a<lb/>considerable degree to the party who is detected.  2.<lb/>In point of inconvenience to the supposed offender<lb/>it is expensive.  In slight cases it will often exceed <note>even supposing the <lb/>party to be guilty<lb/></note> the quantum of suffering proper to be inflicted <add>on a man</add> in<lb/>the way of punishment, in the event of his proving<lb/>guilty:  and as yet it is not determined but that <add>appear ascertained that he </add><lb/>he may be <add>is not</add> innocent.  These considerations make it<lb/>necessary to look out for expedients of a more practicable<lb/>and milder nature.<lb/></p>  


<note>It</note>
<note>It</note>
<pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:47, 9 November 2020

Click Here To Edit

Indirect Legislation

Political

6

Expedients for
the discovery of
the person of the
offender:
Expedient 1.
6 1. Seizure of his
person pro re
nata

It would be a defect

It is evident enough that of all expedients for
this purpose the most effectual is that of seizing
the person of the supposed offender and thenceforward
keeping him always in an a determinate place or
the custody of a determinate person or persons till
the occasions arise [on which it is requisite he which call for him to be
should be] recognized. But this expedient is liable
to two objections: If it is inelig oftentimes very commonly impracticable:
and in point of inconvenience to the supposed offender it is expensive: 1. It is As to it's being very commonly
impracticable: this it must always be, where
the person party who detects is not either by himself
or by such assistance as he can collected on the
spot, superior in point of strength and that to a
considerable degree to the party who is detected. 2.
In point of inconvenience to the supposed offender
it is expensive. In slight cases it will often exceed even supposing the
party to be guilty
the quantum of suffering proper to be inflicted on a man in
the way of punishment, in the event of his proving
guilty: and as yet it is not determined but that appear ascertained that he
he may be is not innocent. These considerations make it
necessary to look out for expedients of a more practicable
and milder nature.

It



Identifier: | JB/087/031/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-9

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

031

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. hamilton

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27556

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in