JB/087/055/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/055/003: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
<note>Non-seduction &sect; <hi rend="superscript">7</hi></note>
<note>Non-seduction &sect; <hi rend="superscript">7</hi></note>


<del><add>have</add> gone before.  It is impolitic: says he &#x2014; perhaps<lb/>so.</del><lb/>and against this he raises <add>[two]</add> other objections besides those<lb/>which I have been endeavouring to solve <add>to which I have been replying</add>. If the <del>criminal</del> <add>homicide</add><lb/><del>[the party thus proscribed] says he is</del> <add>you thus invite men to is to be committed, says he, </add> out of your<lb/>dominions, <del><add>by offering such a</add> the proscription is a breach of </del> <add>you violate</add> the law of<lb/>nations:  <del>an infringement of</del> <add>you break in upon </add> the jurisdiction of some<lb/>foreign state, and expose yourself to the calamities of<lb/>war. This <del>i</del>as far as it applies is true: <del>and the</del> nor<lb/>can the objection be obviated, till a code of international<lb/>law shall have been established for this purpose.<lb/>till nations <add>shall</add> have enacted by common consent a code<lb/>of international law for settling the limits of each<lb/>others jurisdictions and making common cause against<lb/>the enemies of mankind.  If it is within<lb/>your own dominions, continues he, that the deed is<lb/>to be done, you betray your weakness: he who has<lb/>force <add>power</add> to defend himself does not go a begging for assistance.<lb/>Here I should imagine M. Beccaria had<lb/>fallen into an inadvertency. I know not <del>to</del> what the<lb/>examples are which he alludes to: but <del>I should suppose</del><lb/>if there be an instance where a state <add>government</add> has betaken<lb/>itself to this harsh expedient I should imagine<lb/>it was not the force <add>strength</add>  of the offender that <add>has </add> drove them <add>has been was their</add><lb/>to it <add>inducement</add> , but his weakness.  Against fugitives, Great Britain,<lb/>foreign influence out of the question, would be as <add>could do as</add><lb/>impotent <add>little</add> as S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>  Marino.  [Force is of no avail] against<lb/>a man who is not to be found. [power itself is impotent.<lb/><note>A</note><pb/>
<note>These do not<lb/>come properly under<lb/>the present head<lb/></note>
 
<p><del><add>have</add> gone before.  It is impolitic: says he &#x2014; perhaps<lb/>so.</del><lb/>and against this he raises <add>[two]</add> other objections besides those<lb/>which I have been endeavouring to solve <add>to which I have been replying</add>. If the <del>criminal</del> <add>homicide</add><lb/><del>[the party thus proscribed] says he is</del> <add>you thus invite men to is to be committed, says he, </add> out of your<lb/>dominions, <del><add>by offering such a</add> the proscription is a breach of </del> <add>you violate</add> the law of<lb/>nations:  <del>an infringement of</del> <add>you break in upon </add> the jurisdiction of some<lb/>foreign state, and expose yourself to the calamities of<lb/>war. This <del>i</del>as far as it applies is true: <del>and the</del> nor<lb/>can the objection be obviated, till a code of international<lb/>law shall have been established for this purpose.<lb/>till nations <add>shall</add> have enacted by common consent a code<lb/>of international law for settling the limits of each<lb/>others jurisdictions and making common cause against<lb/>the enemies of mankind.  If it is within<lb/>your own dominions, continues he, that the deed is<lb/>to be done, you betray your weakness: he who has<lb/>force <add>power</add> to defend himself does not go a begging for assistance.<lb/>Here I should imagine M. Beccaria had<lb/>fallen into an inadvertency. I know not <del>to</del> what the<lb/>examples are which he alludes to: but <del>I should suppose</del><lb/>if there be an instance where a state <add>government</add> has betaken<lb/>itself to this harsh expedient I should imagine<lb/>it was not the force <add>strength</add>  of the offender that <add>has </add> drove them <add>has been was their</add><lb/>to it <add>inducement</add> , but his weakness.  Against fugitives, Great Britain,<lb/>foreign influence out of the question, would be as <add>could do as</add><lb/>impotent <add>little</add> as S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>  Marino.  [Force is of no avail] against<lb/>a man who is not to be found. [power itself is impotent.<lb/><note>A</note></p>




Line 54: Line 56:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:58, 2 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

Indirect Legislation

Non-seduction § 7

These do not
come properly under
the present head

have gone before. It is impolitic: says he — perhaps
so.

and against this he raises [two] other objections besides those
which I have been endeavouring to solve to which I have been replying. If the criminal homicide
[the party thus proscribed] says he is you thus invite men to is to be committed, says he, out of your
dominions, by offering such a the proscription is a breach of you violate the law of
nations: an infringement of you break in upon the jurisdiction of some
foreign state, and expose yourself to the calamities of
war. This ias far as it applies is true: and the nor
can the objection be obviated, till a code of international
law shall have been established for this purpose.
till nations shall have enacted by common consent a code
of international law for settling the limits of each
others jurisdictions and making common cause against
the enemies of mankind. If it is within
your own dominions, continues he, that the deed is
to be done, you betray your weakness: he who has
force power to defend himself does not go a begging for assistance.
Here I should imagine M. Beccaria had
fallen into an inadvertency. I know not to what the
examples are which he alludes to: but I should suppose
if there be an instance where a state government has betaken
itself to this harsh expedient I should imagine
it was not the force strength of the offender that has drove them has been was their
to it inducement , but his weakness. Against fugitives, Great Britain,
foreign influence out of the question, would be as could do as
impotent little as St Marino. [Force is of no avail] against
a man who is not to be found. [power itself is impotent.
A

























Identifier: | JB/087/055/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

055

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27580

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in