JB/087/074/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/074/002: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
<note>Satisfying</note>
<note>Satisfying</note>


<p>Under all this latitude <add>facility</add> , one would expect<lb/>to find divorces <add><gap/></add> <del>happening every day</del> without<lb/>number.  Experience however testifies the reverse.<lb/>In Scotland they are scarce so frequent as in<lb/>England. [I do not find them to be common either<lb/>in Denmark or in London: no nor even in the<lb/>dominions of the King of Prussia] <note>Qu. of Saxony Wittenberg<lb/>Hanover Husse Holland<lb/></note> [The reasons<lb/>which <del>would weigh</del> <add>in some places <del><gap/></del> prevail</add> with the legislator <add>government</add> not to<lb/><sic>permitt</sic> them [are precisely those which] <del>dispose</del> <add>in other places</add><lb/><add>prevail with</add> the parties not to apply for them] <add>In most instances</add> The reasons<lb/>which <del>would prevent</del> <add><gap/> prevail with</add> the government from permitting<lb/>them <add>when they are forbidden, prevail with</add> the parties [from applying]<lb/><add>not to apply </add>for them when they are permitted.  <note>Many who would have<lb/>been deterred or tormented<lb/>by the restrain take no<lb/>advantage of the liberty.<lb/></note> <del>Q</del> It is in<lb/>this case perhaps <del>where</del> as in most others where<lb/>the government takes upon it to [decide what<lb/>is most for the] understand the interests <add>concerns</add> of individuals<lb/>better than they do themselves, the restraint <add>coercion</add><lb/> <note>it has either a bad effect <lb/>or none at all.<lb/></note> <del>either does miscief or does nothing]<lb/>Many who would be <add>have been</add> deterred</del> or tormented by <lb/>the restraint take no advantage of their liberty.<lb/>In [the instances] <add>these cases</add> in which all cases</del> Where the liberty<lb/>if <sic>allow'd</sic> <add>granted</add> would not have been made use<lb/>of, the law <add>by denying it</add> does nothing: and in <del>all</del> other cases<lb/><del>I can't help suspecting</del>  it does worse.<lb/></p><pb/>
<p>Under all this latitude <add>facility</add> , one would expect<lb/>to find divorces <add><gap/></add> <del>happening every day</del> without<lb/>number.  Experience however testifies the reverse.<lb/>In Scotland they are scarce so frequent as in<lb/>England. [I do not find them to be common either<lb/>in Denmark or in Sweden: no nor even in the<lb/>dominions of the King of Prussia] <note>Qu. of Saxony Wirtemberg<lb/>Hanover Hesse Holland<lb/></note> [The reasons<lb/>which <del>would weigh</del> <add>in some places <del><gap/></del> prevail</add> with the legislator <add>government</add> not to<lb/><sic>permitt</sic> them [are precisely those which] <del>dispose</del> <add>in other places</add><lb/><add>prevail with</add> the parties not to apply for them] <add>In most instances</add> The reasons<lb/>which <del>would prevent</del> <add><gap/> prevail with</add> the government from permitting<lb/>them <add>where they are forbidden, prevail with</add> the parties [from applying]<lb/><add>not to apply </add> for them when they are permitted.  <note>Many who would have<lb/>been deterred or tormented<lb/>by the restraint take no<lb/>advantage of the liberty.<lb/></note> <del>Q</del> It is in<lb/>this case perhaps <del>where</del> as in most others where<lb/>the government takes upon it to [decide what<lb/>is most for the] understand the interests <add>concerns</add> of individuals<lb/>better than they do themselves, the restraint <add>coercion</add><lb/> <note>it has either a bad effect <lb/>or none at all.<lb/></note> <del>either does miscief or does nothing]<lb/>Many who would be <add>have been</add> deterred</del> or tormented by <lb/>the restraint take no advantage of the liberty.<lb/>In [the instances] <add>these cases</add> in which all cases</del> Where the liberty<lb/>if <sic>allow'd</sic> <add>granted</add> would not have been made use<lb/>of, the law <add>by denying it</add> does nothing: and in <del>all</del> other cases<lb/><del>I can't help suspecting</del>  it does worse.<lb/></p><pb/>
   
   


Line 62: Line 62:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:05, 2 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

26

Indirect Legislation

Satisfying

Under all this latitude facility , one would expect
to find divorces happening every day without
number. Experience however testifies the reverse.
In Scotland they are scarce so frequent as in
England. [I do not find them to be common either
in Denmark or in Sweden: no nor even in the
dominions of the King of Prussia] Qu. of Saxony Wirtemberg
Hanover Hesse Holland
[The reasons
which would weigh in some places prevail with the legislator government not to
permitt them [are precisely those which] dispose in other places
prevail with the parties not to apply for them] In most instances The reasons
which would prevent prevail with the government from permitting
them where they are forbidden, prevail with the parties [from applying]
not to apply for them when they are permitted. Many who would have
been deterred or tormented
by the restraint take no
advantage of the liberty.
Q It is in
this case perhaps where as in most others where
the government takes upon it to [decide what
is most for the] understand the interests concerns of individuals
better than they do themselves, the restraint coercion
it has either a bad effect
or none at all.
either does miscief or does nothing]
Many who would be have been deterred
or tormented by
the restraint take no advantage of the liberty.
In [the instances] these cases in which all cases Where the liberty
if allow'd granted would not have been made use
of, the law by denying it does nothing: and in all other cases
I can't help suspecting it does worse.


---page break---




























Identifier: | JB/087/074/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27599

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in