JB/087/113/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/113/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Indirect Legislation</head>
 
<note>Misrule</note>
 
<note>Excluding arbitrary</note>
 
<p><add>day</add> I may be so tomorrow: or if not somebody else<lb/>may: and I may be taken for that somebody else<lb/>In the reign of Lewis 16<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> lettres de cachet, it has<lb/><del>said</del> <add>been said with confidence</add> were made an article of trade.  I have never <lb/>heard that they have in the present: but who<lb/>can tell? <del>the apprehension of abuse.</del> When from<lb/>the nature of things <del>mischief</del> <add>an</add> apprehension is incurable, <lb/>well or ill grounded the mischief of it is<lb/>the same.<lb/></p><p><del>If</del> In default of justice and humanity, I wonder<lb/>that pride <add>and vanity</add> has never <sic>stept</sic> in and shewn the <lb/>disgrace that attends the pursuit of this miserable <lb/>system. <del>To be at the head of an <sic>enlighted</sic></del> <add>That in France at the end of the</add><lb/><del>people, in an <sic>enlightend</sic> age, and not to know</del> <add>18<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> century there should not be ingenuity enough to</add> <note>carry on the affairs of<lb/> government<lb/>!<lb/></note><del>how to govern their</del> <add>[govern] manage the business of government</add> without violating every <del>hour</del><lb/>day the clearest principles of justice! that the ministers <lb/>of Lewis 16<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> should <del>not know</del> acknowledge <add>confess</add><lb/>themselves unable to support him in his throne<lb/>without violences which Lotharius or Clotharius<lb/>or Clodoacharius or whatever was the barbarian's<lb/>name <note>v. Baluz: ibid.<lb/></note> was ashamed [of !] to authorise! <add>could not bear to see!</add><lb/></p> <p>In England we have rules of evidence which<lb/>are of use only to guilt, for innocence has no need<lb/>of them.  On the other side of the water they have powers<lb/>of procedure which are of use only against innocence,<lb/> <note>for</note>
</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:50, 7 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

Indirect Legislation

Misrule

Excluding arbitrary

day I may be so tomorrow: or if not somebody else
may: and I may be taken for that somebody else
In the reign of Lewis 16th lettres de cachet, it has
said been said with confidence were made an article of trade. I have never
heard that they have in the present: but who
can tell? the apprehension of abuse. When from
the nature of things mischief an apprehension is incurable,
well or ill grounded the mischief of it is
the same.

If In default of justice and humanity, I wonder
that pride and vanity has never stept in and shewn the
disgrace that attends the pursuit of this miserable
system. To be at the head of an enlighted That in France at the end of the
people, in an enlightend age, and not to know 18th century there should not be ingenuity enough to carry on the affairs of
government
!
how to govern their [govern] manage the business of government without violating every hour
day the clearest principles of justice! that the ministers
of Lewis 16th should not know acknowledge confess
themselves unable to support him in his throne
without violences which Lotharius or Clotharius
or Clodoacharius or whatever was the barbarian's
name v. Baluz: ibid.
was ashamed [of !] to authorise! could not bear to see!

In England we have rules of evidence which
are of use only to guilt, for innocence has no need
of them. On the other side of the water they have powers
of procedure which are of use only against innocence,
for



















Identifier: | JB/087/113/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

113

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27638

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in