★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/122/083/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>5.</p> <p>On this occasion the Chief Inspector places great importance<lb/>on the distinction between originals and copies. Had<lb/>it been said to me this Account <add>or this paper</add> may serve, provided<lb/>it be authenticated in such or such a | <p>5.</p> <p>On this occasion the Chief Inspector places great importance<lb/>on the distinction between originals and copies. Had<lb/>it been said to me this Account <add>or this paper</add> may serve, provided<lb/>it be authenticated in such or such a manner by such<lb/>or such a person or such or such another, for which<lb/> purpose it is sent back to you, the business would have<lb/>been settled without difficulty.</p> <p>The same persons being the sources of the evidence<lb/><add>and the authentication of the evidence</add> in both cases how the difference between an original and<lb/>a copy can apply I can not imagine. The <add>lost</add> invoices<lb/><del>for</del> <add>on the production of</add> which the Chief Inspector, understanding them to be<lb/>lost <del>is so anxious</del> insists so <sic>peremeptorily</sic> were but copies<lb/>from the books or other antecedent entries made by some<lb/>Clerk in the counting house of the Manufacturers by whom<lb/>the goods were transmitted. Authenticated by the same<lb/>person or persons why may not <add>any</add> other copy be as<lb/>good as these were.</p> <p>Here have I double proof. On the one hand are the<lb/>Manufacturers by whom the goods were sent: and who have<lb/>already declared and <del>cor</del> their signature and are of course<lb/>ready to declare upon oath, these are the goods <del>are</del> as sent<lb/>to such a person for the use of the Penitentiary House.<lb/>On the one hand I have other persons who are ready to<lb/>declare and <del>if an</del> as ready to swear — looking on that<lb/>same account — the goods <sic>comprized</sic> in that account<lb/>were received by us, and applied <unclear>as designed in the<lb/>use</unclear> of the said Penitentiary House. But these persons<lb/>not being dead, nothing that they say will be regarded by<lb/><unclear><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic></unclear> Chief Inspector as being sufficient.</p> <p>The Account now transmitted as from Booth and <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>was obtained by written intercourse and by written intercourse<lb/>only, exactly like <del>that</del> <add> the Receipt</add> obtained from <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> White. The whole of the<lb/><add>correspondence</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin --> correspondence I am<lb/>ready to produce, upon<lb/>oath as before: and<lb/>whatever has been said<lb/>in regard to the <lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> intercourse with <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> White I beg may be considered as repeated with reference<lb/>to this.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
5.
On this occasion the Chief Inspector places great importance
on the distinction between originals and copies. Had
it been said to me this Account or this paper may serve, provided
it be authenticated in such or such a manner by such
or such a person or such or such another, for which
purpose it is sent back to you, the business would have
been settled without difficulty.
The same persons being the sources of the evidence
and the authentication of the evidence in both cases how the difference between an original and
a copy can apply I can not imagine. The lost invoices
for on the production of which the Chief Inspector, understanding them to be
lost is so anxious insists so peremeptorily were but copies
from the books or other antecedent entries made by some
Clerk in the counting house of the Manufacturers by whom
the goods were transmitted. Authenticated by the same
person or persons why may not any other copy be as
good as these were.
Here have I double proof. On the one hand are the
Manufacturers by whom the goods were sent: and who have
already declared and cor their signature and are of course
ready to declare upon oath, these are the goods are as sent
to such a person for the use of the Penitentiary House.
On the one hand I have other persons who are ready to
declare and if an as ready to swear — looking on that
same account — the goods comprized in that account
were received by us, and applied as designed in the
use of the said Penitentiary House. But these persons
not being dead, nothing that they say will be regarded by
Mr Chief Inspector as being sufficient.
The Account now transmitted as from Booth and Co
was obtained by written intercourse and by written intercourse
only, exactly like that the Receipt obtained from Mr White. The whole of the
correspondence
correspondence I am
ready to produce, upon
oath as before: and
whatever has been said
in regard to the
intercourse with Mr White I beg may be considered as repeated with reference
to this.
|
Identifier: | JB/122/083/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
083 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D5 |
||
|
Letter 1970, vol. 7 |
001 |
||
