JB/087/176/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/087/176/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>17</note>
 
<head>Indirect Legislation</head>
 
<note>Accessory</note>
 
<p>[As to the punishment which it may be<lb/>proper to annex to accessory offences and the<lb/>proportion which such punishment ought to bear<lb/>to what is annexed to the principal, these <add>the details</add> are <lb/><add>of this enquiry</add> matters which belong not to the present design.] <lb/>If the punishment of the inchoate <add>preliminary</add> offence be<lb/>equal to that of the [consummated offence] same offence<lb/>when consummated, without any allowance made<lb/>for prudential desistment or repentance, the offender<lb/>wherever he knows he must be punished for<lb/>the preliminary offence will see that he has the<lb/>liberty given him of consummating it for nothing.<lb/>If the <del>evidentiary</del> punishment of an evidentiary<lb/>offence be less than that of the principal, it is<lb/>an instance of punishment reduced pro modo<lb/>probationum. This plan is <sic>followd</sic> <add>principle is adopted</add> in the British<lb/> act abovementioned relative to the receivers of<lb/>stolen metals.  Convicted <add>by direct proof</add> of the principal offence<lb/>the offender would suffer death: convicted of the evidentiary<lb/> offence his punishment is reduced to . . . <lb/>. . . .<lb/></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:39, 8 January 2021

Click Here To Edit

17

Indirect Legislation

Accessory

[As to the punishment which it may be
proper to annex to accessory offences and the
proportion which such punishment ought to bear
to what is annexed to the principal, these the details are
of this enquiry matters which belong not to the present design.]
If the punishment of the inchoate preliminary offence be
equal to that of the [consummated offence] same offence
when consummated, without any allowance made
for prudential desistment or repentance, the offender
wherever he knows he must be punished for
the preliminary offence will see that he has the
liberty given him of consummating it for nothing.
If the evidentiary punishment of an evidentiary
offence be less than that of the principal, it is
an instance of punishment reduced pro modo
probationum. This plan is followd principle is adopted in the British
act abovementioned relative to the receivers of
stolen metals. Convicted by direct proof of the principal offence
the offender would suffer death: convicted of the evidentiary
offence his punishment is reduced to . . .
. . . .

















Identifier: | JB/087/176/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

176

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27701

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in