JB/122/224/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/224/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header and marginal notes in pencil --> <p>27 July 1808 + 25<lb/><note>Answer<lb/>After Query 6</note><lb/>2</p> <p><note>1 Reasons against<lb/>Vouchers referred to A<lb/>Paper A.</note></p> <p><del>The purpos</del></p> <p>The proposition I have in view is this: &#x2014; viz.<lb/>that <del>one p</del> On the occasion of an Account, to be passed<lb/>before the Commissioners of the Audit Office, there is a <lb/>species of evidence called a <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi>, so peculiarly<lb/>adapted to the nature of the business, that, supposing<lb/>it, <add>in respect to this or that article</add> deficient, no other species of evidence is capable<lb/>of affording, <add>in <del>the</del> relation to that article</add> a <sic>compleatly</sic> adequate <foreign>succedaneum:</foreign><lb/>and that, <del><gap/></del> notwithstanding a tender made of evidence<lb/>from the same <hi rend="underline">source</hi>, <add>and</add> in <del>that</del> any of these shapes<lb/>which, according to the principles and practice of the<lb/>Common Law, would be regarded as preferable, <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> not to say exclusively<lb/>preferable</note> <del>a want</del> <add>the absence</add><lb/>of any such <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi> affords of itself such a ground<lb/>of suspicion, as <del>in</del> is sufficient to <del>warrant</del> justify<lb/>and <add>even</add> require a <del>strictness of scrutiny and investigation,</del> <add>degree of strictness and inquisitiveness</add><lb/>such as, had no such deficiency been<lb/>observable, would not have been <del>employed</del> <add>practiced.</add></p> <p>In this proposition, I descry a possible <del>course</del> <add>cause</add><lb/>of the vexation I have experienced, and of<lb/>the ulterior load of vexation, whatsoever it may be, which<lb/>from the same source, it may be my destiny to<lb/>experience.  It is under this conception that by way<lb/>of supplement to those my Answers I have drawn<lb/>up a short paper marked A and intituled<lb/>"<del>Legal</del> Measure  <del>against the <sic>prediliction</sic> in favour of</del> <add>in support of Common Law evidence, as compared</add><lb/><add>"with</add> <hi rend="underline">Vouchers</hi>: and, these measures, being grounded in the<lb/>principles and practice of the Common Law, I beg leave<lb/>to <sic>submitt</sic> to the <del>bo</del> Board at large, whether for the consideration<lb/><add>of</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin -->[+] of this law argument,<lb/><add>short as it is</add> presented by<lb/>an Accountant, in<lb/><add>his own defence</add> the assistance of those<lb/>Members whose<lb/><del>conscience</del> <Add>reputation</add> in the<lb/>profession has<lb/>given the Board the<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> benefit of their service, ought not to be called in. <!-- pencil mark -->| <add>Among</add></p> 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:22, 12 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

27 July 1808 + 25
Answer
After Query 6

2

1 Reasons against
Vouchers referred to A
Paper A.

The purpos

The proposition I have in view is this: — viz.
that one p On the occasion of an Account, to be passed
before the Commissioners of the Audit Office, there is a
species of evidence called a Voucher, so peculiarly
adapted to the nature of the business, that, supposing
it, in respect to this or that article deficient, no other species of evidence is capable
of affording, in the relation to that article a compleatly adequate succedaneum:
and that, notwithstanding a tender made of evidence
from the same source, and in that any of these shapes
which, according to the principles and practice of the
Common Law, would be regarded as preferable, [+] [+] not to say exclusively
preferable
a want the absence
of any such Voucher affords of itself such a ground
of suspicion, as in is sufficient to warrant justify
and even require a strictness of scrutiny and investigation, degree of strictness and inquisitiveness
such as, had no such deficiency been
observable, would not have been employed practiced.

In this proposition, I descry a possible course cause
of the vexation I have experienced, and of
the ulterior load of vexation, whatsoever it may be, which
from the same source, it may be my destiny to
experience. It is under this conception that by way
of supplement to those my Answers I have drawn
up a short paper marked A and intituled
"Legal Measure against the prediliction in favour of in support of Common Law evidence, as compared
"with Vouchers: and, these measures, being grounded in the
principles and practice of the Common Law, I beg leave
to submitt to the bo Board at large, whether for the consideration
of
[+] of this law argument,
short as it is presented by
an Accountant, in
his own defence the assistance of those
Members whose
conscience reputation in the
profession has
given the Board the
benefit of their service, ought not to be called in. | Among




Identifier: | JB/122/224/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

224

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D25 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in