★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/122/161/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header and marginal notes in pencil --> <p>19 July 1808 + 2<lb/><note>J.B. Queries to Board</note><lb/>2 <note>1 <del>Item</del> 2. Item 2</note></p> <p>2. If not in | <!-- header and marginal notes in pencil --> <p>19 July 1808 + 2<lb/><note>J.B. Queries to Board</note><lb/>2 <note>1: <del>Item</del> 2. Item 2</note></p> <p>2. If not in its present state, will it with the<lb/>help of any and what ulterior authentication, or security<lb/>for correctness? as for instance an affidavit from<lb/>any and what person, being a member of, or in the<lb/>service of, the said partnership?</p> <p>3. Should that document not be sufficient, will it<lb/>be rendered so, by the <del><del>acknowledgment</del> <add>other document sent in by the Accountant at the same time, viz the</add> <sic>stampt</sic> receipt<lb/><add>dated <!-- addition sign and note in pencil -->[+]</add> <note>[+]Give the date of the Receipt</note> given by <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> White, surviving partner of the firm of <note> of <!-- blank space --><gap/> 1808</note><lb/><hi rend="underline">Campbell and White</hi>, whereby the receipt of <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> cast<lb/>iron from the said Booth and <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic>, and <del><add>of</add> payment</del><lb/>of £80 <del>in consideration for four years</del> <add>paid by the Accountant for</add> <sic>wharfage</sic> rent, <add><del>thereof</del></add><lb/><add>for four years ending the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 1798, for the use of <!-- continues into margin --> their wharf at Milbank,<lb/><del>by</del> in respect of the deposit<lb/>made</add> of the said cast iron <add>for during that time</add> is acknowledged?</p> <p>4. Should these three documents not be of themselves<lb/><add>deemed</add> sufficient, will they be rendered so by the <add>ulterior testimony</add> <del>attestation</del> of<lb/>the person <del>mentioned</del> <add>in quality of <del><gap/></del> <unclear>Fireman</unclear> of the events in question</add> by whom they were ordered<lb/>and received <add>as they came in</add>, viz. Mr John Lloyd, <del>an item <add>the quan</add></del><lb/><del><gap/></del> of the Account<del>ant</del> <del>and in the <sic>annext</sic> <foreign>quere</foreign></del> <add><del><sic>annect</sic> to Item 4</del> who in the Query annexed to Item the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></add><lb/>is mentioned as having "superintended the delivery thereof"<lb/><add>viz at</add> the said wharf? and if so, in what shape is it<lb/>the pleasure of the Board to receive such his testimony?<lb/><del>his</del> <add>in that of</add> an affidavit, as proposed, in and by the said Queries<lb/>or not without his personal attendance <add> as ye Witness</add> for the purpose<lb/>of <add>his</add> being examined upon oath or otherwise as therein<lb/>also proposed?</p> <p>5. <del>The non <sic>forthcomingness</sic> of three out <add>In the instance of</add></del> Of the six<lb/>original Invoices, three <del>not</del> being missing and not<lb/>producible, is such deficiency regarded by the <del>Board</del> <add>Commissioners</add><lb/>as binding <del>them</del> or authorising them to disallow<lb/>the Accountant's discharge <del>b</del> in respect of the corresponding<lb/>disbursements, notwithstanding the other evidence tendered as above?<lb/><add>and</add><lb/> <!-- continues in margin -->and if so in what<lb/>principle <add>or rule</add> of law is<lb/>such allowance<lb/>justified?</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
19 July 1808 + 2
J.B. Queries to Board
2 1: Item 2. Item 2
2. If not in its present state, will it with the
help of any and what ulterior authentication, or security
for correctness? as for instance an affidavit from
any and what person, being a member of, or in the
service of, the said partnership?
3. Should that document not be sufficient, will it
be rendered so, by the acknowledgment other document sent in by the Accountant at the same time, viz the stampt receipt
dated [+] [+]Give the date of the Receipt given by Mr White, surviving partner of the firm of of 1808
Campbell and White, whereby the receipt of the cast
iron from the said Booth and Co, and of payment
of £80 in consideration for four years paid by the Accountant for wharfage rent, thereof
for four years ending the 1st of Decr 1798, for the use of their wharf at Milbank,
by in respect of the deposit
made of the said cast iron for during that time is acknowledged?
4. Should these three documents not be of themselves
deemed sufficient, will they be rendered so by the ulterior testimony attestation of
the person mentioned in quality of Fireman of the events in question by whom they were ordered
and received as they came in, viz. Mr John Lloyd, an item the quan
of the Accountant and in the annext quere annect to Item 4 who in the Query annexed to Item the 4th
is mentioned as having "superintended the delivery thereof"
viz at the said wharf? and if so, in what shape is it
the pleasure of the Board to receive such his testimony?
his in that of an affidavit, as proposed, in and by the said Queries
or not without his personal attendance as ye Witness for the purpose
of his being examined upon oath or otherwise as therein
also proposed?
5. The non forthcomingness of three out In the instance of Of the six
original Invoices, three not being missing and not
producible, is such deficiency regarded by the Board Commissioners
as binding them or authorising them to disallow
the Accountant's discharge b in respect of the corresponding
disbursements, notwithstanding the other evidence tendered as above?
and
and if so in what
principle or rule of law is
such allowance
justified?
|
Identifier: | JB/122/161/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-19 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
161 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D2 / E2 |
||
|
TH 1806 |
|||
|
Andre Morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
