★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>19 July 1808 + 5<lb/>J.B. Queries to Board</note><lb/>(2 <note> III. Item 4.</note></p> <p>In like manner, <hi rend="underline"><sic> | <!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>19 July 1808 + 5<lb/><note>J.B. Queries to Board</note><lb/>(2 <note> III. Item 4.</note></p> <p>In like manner, <hi rend="underline"><sic>Mr</sic> Hutchinson</hi>, having for a<lb/>length of time continued paying the <del>same</del> workmen<lb/>at the same rate, at which the same workmen had<lb/>been paid by <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Lloyd, that is that, for the<lb/>whole of the time, the testimony of each <del>receives con</del> <add>will receive</add><lb/>confirmation from that of the other.</p> <p>In a remark <sic>annext</sic> to the date of 26t<hi rend="superscript">h</hi> <sic>Sept.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 1795<lb/>in Item the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>, the Accountant speaks of the <del><gap/></del> <add> superintendence of the works <!-- continues in margin --> (meaning the <del><sic>compleat</sic></del> constant superintendence</add><lb/> as passing about <!-- continues in margin -->that time into other <lb/>hands: the other hands<lb/>there meant were<lb/>those of the said <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Hutchinson.</p> <p>In satisfaction of the doubt expressed by the words<lb/>in <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspectors Query <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 5, <add><del>in relation to the Item <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.</sic> 4,</del></add> in which he says<lb/><add>(speaking of the Item 4)</add> "it not appearing <hi rend="underline">by whom</hi> the payments were made,<lb/>"or whether on public or private account" — both the<lb/>above persons can testify, that <add>in respect of</add> the works in which<lb/>the workmen so paid were employed, no payment<lb/>was ever made on more than one Account, which<lb/>Account, <del><gap/></del> before the acceptance of the Accountants<lb/>proposal by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, <del>was pri</del> <add> as mentioned</add><lb/><add>in his so often quoted Examination + <note>+23 June 1798</note> was</add> altogether <hi rend="underline">private</hi> account, and from that time<lb/>became <del>in so far</del> thereby <hi rend="underline">public</hi> account; <add>viz</add> in<lb/>so far as <add><del><gap/></del> in pursuance of such authority,</add> money <add>so</add> disbursed out of a private purse,<lb/>with the exception of the £2,000 <del>Government</del> <add>public</add> money<lb/><add>here</add> in question <del>could</del> <add>can <del>after such authority</del></add> be said to be disbursed <hi rend="underline">on public<lb/>Account.</hi></p> <p>In the case of the cast iron (cast at Sheffield)<lb/>some little perplexity was occasioned by the circumstance,<lb/>that, besides <del>that</del> <add>the goods <del>of</del></add> cast for the Penitentiary House<lb/>there were goods <add>(cast iron)</add> of a different description, cast<lb/>by order of the same person (viz. the Accountants<lb/>Brother General Bentham), also on Government<lb/>account, viz. iron huts <del>n</del> anchors, or other articles<lb/>belonging to naval vessels.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
19 July 1808 + 5
J.B. Queries to Board
(2 III. Item 4.
In like manner, Mr Hutchinson, having for a
length of time continued paying the same workmen
at the same rate, at which the same workmen had
been paid by Mr Lloyd, that is that, for the
whole of the time, the testimony of each receives con will receive
confirmation from that of the other.
In a remark annext to the date of 26th Sept.r 1795
in Item the 4th, the Accountant speaks of the superintendence of the works (meaning the compleat constant superintendence
as passing about that time into other
hands: the other hands
there meant were
those of the said Mr
Hutchinson.
In satisfaction of the doubt expressed by the words
in Mr Chief Inspectors Query No 5, in relation to the Item No. 4, in which he says
(speaking of the Item 4) "it not appearing by whom the payments were made,
"or whether on public or private account" — both the
above persons can testify, that in respect of the works in which
the workmen so paid were employed, no payment
was ever made on more than one Account, which
Account, before the acceptance of the Accountants
proposal by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was pri as mentioned
in his so often quoted Examination + +23 June 1798 was altogether private account, and from that time
became in so far thereby public account; viz in
so far as in pursuance of such authority, money so disbursed out of a private purse,
with the exception of the £2,000 Government public money
here in question could can after such authority be said to be disbursed on public
Account.
In the case of the cast iron (cast at Sheffield)
some little perplexity was occasioned by the circumstance,
that, besides that the goods of cast for the Penitentiary House
there were goods (cast iron) of a different description, cast
by order of the same person (viz. the Accountants
Brother General Bentham), also on Government
account, viz. iron huts n anchors, or other articles
belonging to naval vessels.
|
Identifier: | JB/122/164/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-19 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
164 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D5 / E2 |
||
|
TH 1806 |
|||
|
Andre Morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
