JB/122/173/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/173/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>11 July 1808 + 5 <note>4</note><lb/><note>Query 1</note><lb/>(2 <note> 2. Requisition 2.</note></p> <p>In the same Report of the <add>said</add> Finance Committee, and in the<lb/>same leaf as that on which the Copy of the abovementioned<lb/>King's Warrant is printed, is printed a Treasury Letter<lb/>signed <hi rend="underline">Charles Long</hi>, <del><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic></del> the said <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Charles Long being<lb/>then one of the Secretaries to the Treasury, and dated <del>the</del><lb/>Treasury Chambers 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> May 1798: in which <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Long speaks<lb/>of the said Contract as not having <add>then</add> been executed <del>declaring</del> <add>concluding</add><lb/><del>that the</del> <add>with saying "The</add> Lords of the Treasury are ready to enter into the<lb/>"Contract with <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham" (the Accountant) "whenever<lb/>"the pecuniary difficulties above referred to are removed;<lb/>"and <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham, on his part, has always expressed<lb/>"his readiness to do the service." ][ [+]<note> [+] Executed or not<lb/>executed, the instrument<lb/>thus called of was<lb/>and is, with reference<lb/>to the <del>point assumed</del> <add>implied</add><lb/>purpose of the requisition<lb/>viz. that of an enquiry<lb/>into the propriety of<lb/>the expenditure made<lb/>of the money which<lb/>was and is the subject<lb/>of the Account,<lb/><del>not useless</del> <add>irrelevant</add> and inapplicable:<lb/>and<lb/>the requisition by<lb/>which it is called<lb/>for, useless and<lb/>unwarrantable.</note></p> <p><del>3.</del> <add>3. All that is <del>as above</del> herein above quoted, with so much more that might have been quoted and transcribed</add> not being sufficient to satisfy <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Chief Inspector in relation to the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> requisition<lb/>I (the Accountant) do hereby declare that the said<lb/>Contract <del>has</del> neither had then, not has since been executed:<lb/>which being the case, the <add>only</add> event in which <del><gap/></del><lb/>I am required to produce the crime not having taken<lb/>place, I do not produce it.</p> <p>As to the Draft itself &#x2014; were the Draft <add>of Contract</add> of which<lb/><add>at the time</add> when it was ordered it can not but be assumed that<lb/>it was intended to be executed, if that be what he is<lb/>desirous to see, he knows where to find it: for <add>in this very <foreign>Quere</foreign></add> he himself<lb/>mentions where it is to be found.</p> 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:11, 13 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

11 July 1808 + 5 4
Query 1
(2 2. Requisition 2.

In the same Report of the said Finance Committee, and in the
same leaf as that on which the Copy of the abovementioned
King's Warrant is printed, is printed a Treasury Letter
signed Charles Long, Mr the said Mr Charles Long being
then one of the Secretaries to the Treasury, and dated the
Treasury Chambers 4th May 1798: in which Mr Long speaks
of the said Contract as not having then been executed declaring concluding
that the with saying "The Lords of the Treasury are ready to enter into the
"Contract with Mr Bentham" (the Accountant) "whenever
"the pecuniary difficulties above referred to are removed;
"and Mr Bentham, on his part, has always expressed
"his readiness to do the service." ][ [+] [+] Executed or not
executed, the instrument
thus called of was
and is, with reference
to the point assumed implied
purpose of the requisition
viz. that of an enquiry
into the propriety of
the expenditure made
of the money which
was and is the subject
of the Account,
not useless irrelevant and inapplicable:
and
the requisition by
which it is called
for, useless and
unwarrantable.

3. 3. All that is as above herein above quoted, with so much more that might have been quoted and transcribed not being sufficient to satisfy Mr
Chief Inspector in relation to the 2d requisition
I (the Accountant) do hereby declare that the said
Contract has neither had then, not has since been executed:
which being the case, the only event in which
I am required to produce the crime not having taken
place, I do not produce it.

As to the Draft itself — were the Draft of Contract of which
at the time when it was ordered it can not but be assumed that
it was intended to be executed, if that be what he is
desirous to see, he knows where to find it: for in this very Quere he himself
mentions where it is to be found.




Identifier: | JB/122/173/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

173

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D5 / E2 / F5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in