★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>11 July 1808 + <del>5</del> <note>5</note><lb/><note><foreign>Quere</foreign> 1.</note><lb/>1 <note>2. Requisition 3.</note></p> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [3. Requisition the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>. "He is also required to state<lb/>"whether <del>the</del> he has received any assurances of the intention<lb/>"of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, to<lb/>"carry the original plan of erecting penitentiary Houses<lb/>"into execution."]</p> <p>Answer to this 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> requisition</p> <p> 1. I object to this requisition also, as irrelevant,<lb/>and <del>for</del> <add>on</add> the same <del>reason</del> <add>ground</add> as that stated in my<lb/>answer to the last preceding one.</p> <p>2. Assurances to the effect in question <del>are</del> <add>had</add><lb/>already <add>been</add> stated by me <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] in my said<lb/><hi rend="underline">examination</hi>,<lb/>(being the document<lb/>to which in <add>and by</add> my<lb/>abovementioned first<lb/>Letter of the 14 July<lb/>1807 to the Board,<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector<lb/>had been referred:</note> <del><add>the document</add> in my said answer to the said<lb/>last preceding requisition</del> Therefore <add>the information required by</add> this question, having<lb/><del>already</del> been <del>answered</del> already furnished before the question<lb/>was put, the question <Add>was and</add> is on that account useless.</p> <p> 3. On this occasion, I again beg leave of the <lb/>Board to observe, that the only <del>relevant</del> question in<lb/>this head that could have been relevant was — whether<lb/>the authority given to me in the said Kings warrant<lb/>for the expenditure of the money thereby granted to me<lb/>had been <hi rend="underline">revoked</hi>, while any part of the said money<lb/>was left unexpended: and that to warrant my<lb/>continuing the expenditure of it, though in fact I had<lb/>received assurances < | <!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>11 July 1808 + <del>5</del> <note>5</note><lb/><note><foreign>Quere</foreign> 1.</note><lb/>1 <note>2. Requisition 3.</note></p> <!-- brackets in pencil --><p> [3. Requisition the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>. "He is also required to state<lb/>"whether <del>the</del> he has received any assurances of the intention<lb/>"of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, to<lb/>"carry the original plan of erecting penitentiary Houses<lb/>"into execution."]</p> <p>Answer to this 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> requisition</p> <p> 1. I object to this requisition also, as irrelevant,<lb/>and <del>for</del> <add>on</add> the same <del>reason</del> <add>ground</add> as that stated in my<lb/>answer to the last preceding one.</p> <p>2. Assurances to the effect in question <del>are</del> <add>had</add><lb/>already <add>been</add> stated by me <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] in my said<lb/><hi rend="underline">examination</hi>,<lb/>(being the document<lb/>to which in <add>and by</add> my<lb/>abovementioned first<lb/>Letter of the 14 July<lb/>1807 to the Board,<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector<lb/>had been referred:</note> <del><add>the document</add> in my said answer to the said<lb/>last preceding requisition</del> Therefore <add>the information required by</add> this question, having<lb/><del>already</del> been <del>answered</del> already furnished before the question<lb/>was put, the question <Add>was and</add> is on that account useless.</p> <p> 3. On this occasion, I again beg leave of the <lb/>Board to observe, that the only <del>relevant</del> question in<lb/>this head that could have been relevant was — whether<lb/>the authority given to me in the said Kings warrant<lb/>for the expenditure of the money thereby granted to me<lb/>had been <hi rend="underline">revoked</hi>, while any part of the said money<lb/>was left unexpended: and that to warrant my<lb/>continuing the expenditure of it, though in fact I had<lb/>received assurances <add>express and implied together</add> in abundance, as well <del>during</del><lb/><del>the <add>said</add> expenditure so at</del> pending as subsequently to the expenditure,<lb/>as such assurances <del>were ever</del> <add> could ever have been</add> necessary. <!-- brackets in pencil --> [<del>to warrant it</del>]</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
11 July 1808 + 5 5
Quere 1.
1 2. Requisition 3.
[3. Requisition the 3d. "He is also required to state
"whether the he has received any assurances of the intention
"of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, to
"carry the original plan of erecting penitentiary Houses
"into execution."]
Answer to this 3d requisition
1. I object to this requisition also, as irrelevant,
and for on the same reason ground as that stated in my
answer to the last preceding one.
2. Assurances to the effect in question are had
already been stated by me [+] [+] in my said
examination,
(being the document
to which in and by my
abovementioned first
Letter of the 14 July
1807 to the Board,
Mr Chief Inspector
had been referred: the document in my said answer to the said
last preceding requisition Therefore the information required by this question, having
already been answered already furnished before the question
was put, the question was and is on that account useless.
3. On this occasion, I again beg leave of the
Board to observe, that the only relevant question in
this head that could have been relevant was — whether
the authority given to me in the said Kings warrant
for the expenditure of the money thereby granted to me
had been revoked, while any part of the said money
was left unexpended: and that to warrant my
continuing the expenditure of it, though in fact I had
received assurances express and implied together in abundance, as well during
the said expenditure so at pending as subsequently to the expenditure,
as such assurances were ever could ever have been necessary. [to warrant it]
|
Identifier: | JB/122/174/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-11 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
174 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D5 / E1 / F5 |
||
|
TH 1806 |
|||
|
Andre Morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
