JB/122/175/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/175/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --><p>11 July 1808 + 8<lb/><note><foreign>Quere</foreign> 1</note><lb/>(1 <note>4. Requisition 4.</note></p> <!-- brackets in pencil --> <p>[4. Requisition the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>.  "And to <sic>transmitt</sic> to this Office<lb/>"the originals or authenticated copies of any letters<lb/>"or communication he may have received from the Treasury."]</p> <p>Answer</p> <p>After the documents already <add>herein</add> quoted or referred to,<lb/>and for the reasons already given in and by my Answer<lb/>to the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> and 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <add>of these</add> requisitions, which documents were,<lb/>at the time of penning these requisitions, under the eye of<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector &#x2014; or without his <del>default</del> <add>wilful default or neglect</add> might <del>it</del> and<lb/>would have been &#x2014; I object to this requisition, it<lb/>is <del>par</del> <add>not only</add> irrelevant, <add>and</add> useless, <del>and particularly</del> <add>but in a more particular degree</add> vexatious.</p> <p>The documents which he had before him being, in my<lb/>view of the matter, <add>as above given,</add> abundantly sufficient to the purpose, I<lb/>see no bounds to the quantity of useless matter <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] <add>hereby</add> called for by him, <add><del>the greater</del></add> in the probable<lb/>quantity <del>of which</del><lb/>any more than<lb/>in the relevance<lb/>and utility of<lb/>which, he seems<lb/>not to have vouchsafed<lb/>a thought<lb/>while thus <del>determined</del> <add>endeavouring</add><lb/>to load<lb/>me with</note> <del>with</del><lb/>the trouble and <sic>expence</sic> of <del>which he seems inclined to load</del> <add>furnishing it.</add><lb/><add><del>me</del></add></p> <p><add>On the occasion in question,</add> The authority of the Board, <add> if my conception of it be correct,</add> is limited to the inquiry &#x2014;<lb/>whether <del>the</del> a sum of money <del><gap/></del> equal to a<lb/>sum received by me from the Treasury for a certain purpose<lb/><del>was</del> <add>has</add> or has not <add>been</add> applied by me to that purpose.</p> <p>Though the curiosity of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector goes so far<lb/>beyond, his authority does not go <add> a little</add> beyond, the authority<lb/>of the Board.  His curiosity seems to extend to the whole<lb/>of the correspondence which, <add> during the course of about 15 years</add> I have had with the<lb/><del>said Lords Commissioners</del> <add>Treasury Board</add> on the subject of Penitentiary<lb/>Houses.  To that curiosity I have not on my own<lb/>part, on any other score than that of <del>the trouble and <sic>expence;</sic></del> <add><del><gap/></del> waste of time, labour, and money</add><lb/>any objection <add>or reluctance, to giving the fullest satisfaction</add>  but on that score my reluctance is<lb/><del>real and very considerable</del> <add> strong and decisive.</add> [+] <note> [+] On a <hi rend="underline">former</hi> occasion<lb/>viz the <del><gap/> <unclear>Lord</unclear></del> <add>Commissioners</add><lb/><add>sitting in Somerset Place had</add> the goodness (I think)<lb/>to apply to the Treasury<lb/>for information <add>for an article so</add> <del>which</del><lb/><del>could</del> <add>circumstanced as to be</add> in a more advantageous<lb/>manner <del>be</del><lb/>supplied from that superior<lb/>source, than from any at<lb/>my command: if on <hi rend="underline">this</hi><lb/>occasion it be their pleasure<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> to take the same course, they have hereby full certainty from me <unclear>then</unclear> to signify my full assent to it being communicated.</note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:17, 13 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

11 July 1808 + 8
Quere 1
(1 4. Requisition 4.

[4. Requisition the 4th. "And to transmitt to this Office
"the originals or authenticated copies of any letters
"or communication he may have received from the Treasury."]

Answer

After the documents already herein quoted or referred to,
and for the reasons already given in and by my Answer
to the 2d and 3d of these requisitions, which documents were,
at the time of penning these requisitions, under the eye of
Mr Chief Inspector — or without his default wilful default or neglect might it and
would have been — I object to this requisition, it
is par not only irrelevant, and useless, and particularly but in a more particular degree vexatious.

The documents which he had before him being, in my
view of the matter, as above given, abundantly sufficient to the purpose, I
see no bounds to the quantity of useless matter [+] [+] hereby called for by him, the greater in the probable
quantity of which
any more than
in the relevance
and utility of
which, he seems
not to have vouchsafed
a thought
while thus determined endeavouring
to load
me with
with
the trouble and expence of which he seems inclined to load furnishing it.
me

On the occasion in question, The authority of the Board, if my conception of it be correct, is limited to the inquiry —
whether the a sum of money equal to a
sum received by me from the Treasury for a certain purpose
was has or has not been applied by me to that purpose.

Though the curiosity of Mr Chief Inspector goes so far
beyond, his authority does not go a little beyond, the authority
of the Board. His curiosity seems to extend to the whole
of the correspondence which, during the course of about 15 years I have had with the
said Lords Commissioners Treasury Board on the subject of Penitentiary
Houses. To that curiosity I have not on my own
part, on any other score than that of the trouble and expence; waste of time, labour, and money
any objection or reluctance, to giving the fullest satisfaction but on that score my reluctance is
real and very considerable strong and decisive. [+] [+] On a former occasion
viz the Lord Commissioners
sitting in Somerset Place had the goodness (I think)
to apply to the Treasury
for information for an article so which
could circumstanced as to be in a more advantageous
manner be
supplied from that superior
source, than from any at
my command: if on this
occasion it be their pleasure
to take the same course, they have hereby full certainty from me then to signify my full assent to it being communicated.




Identifier: | JB/122/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

175

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D8 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in