JB/122/181/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/181/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>25 July 1808 + <lb/><note>Answer<lb/>Query 3</note><lb/>(3</p> <p><del>By th</del></p> <p>By the non-<sic>forthcomingness</sic> of these documents, I<lb/>have found myself subjected to very considerable prejudice<lb/>and inconvenience.  I have had <sic>Mr</sic> Chief<lb/>Inspector's curiosity on this head to satisfy; <del>at least</del> <add>rather</add><lb/>to endeavour to satisfy, and with very little hope<lb/>of success.  But, <del>by supposing</del> <add>from the supposition of</add> them, supposing them<lb/>suppressed <del>by me</del> <add> by myself or any one else</add>, it does not appear to me to be easy<lb/>to conceive <del>w</del> in what possible way, <del>and</del> <hi rend="underline">with</hi><lb/>any more than <hi rend="underline">without</hi>, a fraudulent intention on<lb/>my part, I <del>should <gap/><del> <add>could have derived</add> or expected to derive any<lb/>Advantage <del>from it</del>: the sort of evidence which <del>by</del><lb/><add>certainly is <del>the <gap/></del> in its <gap/> the <gap/> and which</add> in the estimation of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector, seems to be the<lb/>best evidence, or at least, <add>comparatively</add> superior evidence, being<lb/>as to those articles <del>Given</del> unproducible, I am thus<lb/>reduced to take my chance, with what in the same<lb/>estimate seems to be regarded if not as inadmissible,<lb/>At any rate as comparatively speaking inferior evidence.</p> <p><del>If</del> <add>Among the evidence of</add> a part <del>capable of</del> which <add>at one time I</add> had it in<lb/><del>his</del> <add>my</add> power to prove, <add>&amp;</add> by <del>different</del> <add>more</add> articles of evidence <add>there are</add>,<lb/><del>an part</del> article happens to be lost to <del>him</del> <add>me</add>.  The<lb/>loss being sustained, and that loss a pure misfortune<lb/>by which nothing could be got, to what <add>good</add> purpose<lb/><del>plagues he</del> <add>ply me</add> with enquiries as to the cause of it?<lb/>Unfortunately for <del>respondents</del> <add>Accountants</add> to <del>feed</del> <add>return</add> an answer<lb/>that shall cost hours or days or weeks, may<lb/>cost <del><gap/></del> a questioning Inspector not a quarter of<lb/>a minute.</p>   
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>25 July 1808 + <lb/><note>Answer<lb/>Query 3</note><lb/>(3</p> <p><del>By th</del></p> <p>By the non-<sic>forthcomingness</sic> of these documents, I<lb/>have found myself subjected to very considerable prejudice<lb/>and inconvenience.  I have had <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief<lb/>Inspector's curiosity on this head to satisfy; <del>at least</del> <add>rather</add><lb/>to endeavour to satisfy, and with very little hope<lb/>of success.  But, <del>by suppressing</del> <add>from the suppression of</add> them, supposing them<lb/>suppressed <del>by me</del> <add> by myself or any one else</add>, it does not appear to me to be easy<lb/>to conceive <del>w</del> in what possible way, <del>and</del> <hi rend="underline">with</hi><lb/>any more than <hi rend="underline">without</hi>, a fraudulent intention on<lb/>my part, I <del>should receive</del> <add>could have derived</add> or expected to derive any<lb/>advantage <del>from it</del>: the sort of evidence which <del>by</del><lb/><add>certainly is <del>the readiest</del> in its nature the readiest and which</add> in the estimate of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector, seems to be the<lb/>best evidence, or at least, <add>comparatively</add> superior evidence, being<lb/>as to those articles <del>given</del> unproducible, I am thus<lb/>reduced to take my chance, with what in the same<lb/>estimate seems to be regarded if not as inadmissible,<lb/>at any rate as comparatively speaking inferior evidence.</p> <p><del>If</del> <add>Among the evidence if</add> a part <del>capable of</del> which <add>at one time I</add> had it in<lb/><del>his</del> <add>my</add> power to prove, <add>&amp;</add> by <del>different</del> <add>more</add> articles of evidence <add>than one,</add>,<lb/>one <del>part</del> article happens to be lost to <del>him</del> <add>me</add>.  The<lb/>loss being sustained, and that loss a pure misfortune<lb/>by which nothing could be got, to what <add>good</add> purpose<lb/><del>plagues he</del> <add>ply me</add> with enquiries as to the cause of it?<lb/>Unfortunately for <del>respondents</del> <add>Accountants</add> to <del>find</del> <add>return</add> an answer<lb/>that shall cost hours or days or weeks, may<lb/>cost <del>an</del> a questioning Inspector not a quarter of<lb/>a minute.</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:23, 18 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

25 July 1808 +
Answer
Query 3

(3

By th

By the non-forthcomingness of these documents, I
have found myself subjected to very considerable prejudice
and inconvenience. I have had Mr Chief
Inspector's curiosity on this head to satisfy; at least rather
to endeavour to satisfy, and with very little hope
of success. But, by suppressing from the suppression of them, supposing them
suppressed by me by myself or any one else, it does not appear to me to be easy
to conceive w in what possible way, and with
any more than without, a fraudulent intention on
my part, I should receive could have derived or expected to derive any
advantage from it: the sort of evidence which by
certainly is the readiest in its nature the readiest and which in the estimate of Mr Chief Inspector, seems to be the
best evidence, or at least, comparatively superior evidence, being
as to those articles given unproducible, I am thus
reduced to take my chance, with what in the same
estimate seems to be regarded if not as inadmissible,
at any rate as comparatively speaking inferior evidence.

If Among the evidence if a part capable of which at one time I had it in
his my power to prove, & by different more articles of evidence than one,,
one part article happens to be lost to him me. The
loss being sustained, and that loss a pure misfortune
by which nothing could be got, to what good purpose
plagues he ply me with enquiries as to the cause of it?
Unfortunately for respondents Accountants to find return an answer
that shall cost hours or days or weeks, may
cost an a questioning Inspector not a quarter of
a minute.




Identifier: | JB/122/181/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

181

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in