JB/122/193/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/193/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/193/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>13 July 1808 + 2<lb/><note>Query 5. Item 4</note><lb/>2</p> <!-- first paragraph crossed through in pencil.  Deletion and bracketed number in pencil --> <p><del>Preamble, proposition the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> &#x2014; <hi rend="superscript">[3]</hi> "or whether a public<lb/>or private account."</p> <p>Answer: <!-- paragraph mark in pencil --></p> <p><hi rend="superscript">[3]</hi> By the testimony of the same person<lb/>in what shape soever received it would also have<lb/>appeared, and would at any time appear, that<lb?>the whole of the sum in question £1821.16.4 <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] (inconsiderable and<lb/><gap/> possible<lb/>errors <del>exampled</del> <add>on either side</add> of<lb/>course expected)</note><lb/>was expended on <hi rend="underline">public</hi> account; viz. the account<lb/>here in question.</p> <p><!-- deletion in pencil --> <del>Answer<lb/>Preamble proposition the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>, as above.</del></p> <p><!-- bracketed number in pencil --> <hi rend="superscript">[1]</hi> By this proposition it appears that <add>of the ting called <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi></add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector<lb/>has in his mind a definition, <del>of Voucher</del><lb/>composed of more characters than one, and that of<lb/>three characters, be <del>they their</del> <add>they in nature and</add> number what they<lb/>may, the books are not fortunate enough to possess<lb/>so much as one.</p> <p>But what, in a manner <add>which to me seems</add> altogether extraordinary,<lb/>appears some how or other to have been substituted by<lb/>him, is that if by <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi> <del>m</del> be meant <hi rend="underline">conclusive<lb/>evidence</hi> the Books in question were never tendered<lb/>by me <add>as already possessing</add> any such character, <add><del>quality</del></add>, but writing to receive<lb/>it by means of the <del>evidence</del> <add><gap/></add> of this <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Lloyd,<lb/>to be appended to them, in which shape truer it<lb/>might be the pleasure of the Board to receive it: <del><gap/></del><lb/>a pleasure which I had no possible means of <del><gap/></del> <add>learning,</add><lb/>but by <add><del>without</del></add> asking for it, a means which, unfortunately<lb/>for me, has hitherto proved insufficient.</p>       
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>13 July 1808 + 2<lb/><note>Query 5. Item 4</note><lb/>2</p> <!-- first paragraph crossed through in pencil.  Deletion and bracketed number in pencil --> <p><del>Preamble, proposition the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></del> &#x2014; <hi rend="superscript">[3]</hi> "or whether a public<lb/>or private account."</p> <p>Answer: <!-- paragraph mark in pencil --></p> <p><hi rend="superscript">[3]</hi> By the testimony of the same person<lb/>in what shape soever received it would also have<lb/>appeared, and would at any time appear, that<lb/>the whole of the sum in question £1821.16.4 <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] (inconsiderable and<lb/><gap/> possible<lb/>errors <del>exampled</del> <add>on either side</add> of<lb/>course expected)</note><lb/>was expended on <hi rend="underline">public</hi> account; viz. the account<lb/>here in question.</p> <p><!-- deletion in pencil --> <del>Answer<lb/>Preamble proposition the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>, as above.</del></p> <p><!-- bracketed number in pencil --> <hi rend="superscript">[1]</hi> By this proposition it appears that <add>of the thing called <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi></add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector<lb/>has in his mind a definition, <del>of Voucher</del><lb/>composed of more characters than one, and that of<lb/>three characters, be <del>they their</del> <add>they in nature and</add> number what they<lb/>may, <unclear>these</unclear> books are not fortunate enough to possess<lb/>so much as one.</p> <p>But what, in a manner <add>which to me seems</add> altogether extraordinary,<lb/>appears some how or other to have been substituted by<lb/>him, is that if by <hi rend="underline">Voucher</hi> <del>m</del> be meant <hi rend="underline">conclusive<lb/>evidence</hi> the Books in question were never tendered<lb/>by me <add>as already possessing</add> any such character, <add><del>quality</del></add>, but writing to receive<lb/>it by means of the <del>evidence</del> <add>testimony</add> of this <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Lloyd,<lb/>to be appended to them, in which shape <sic>soever</sic> it<lb/>might be the pleasure of the Board to receive it: <del><gap/></del><lb/>a pleasure which I had no possible means of <del><gap/></del> <add>learning,</add><lb/>but by <add><del>without</del></add> asking for it, a means which, unfortunately<lb/>for me, has hitherto proved insufficient.</p>       




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:20, 18 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

13 July 1808 + 2
Query 5. Item 4
2

Preamble, proposition the 3d[3] "or whether a public
or private account."

Answer:

[3] By the testimony of the same person
in what shape soever received it would also have
appeared, and would at any time appear, that
the whole of the sum in question £1821.16.4 [+] [+] (inconsiderable and
possible
errors exampled on either side of
course expected)

was expended on public account; viz. the account
here in question.

Answer
Preamble proposition the 1st, as above.

[1] By this proposition it appears that of the thing called Voucher Mr Chief Inspector
has in his mind a definition, of Voucher
composed of more characters than one, and that of
three characters, be they their they in nature and number what they
may, these books are not fortunate enough to possess
so much as one.

But what, in a manner which to me seems altogether extraordinary,
appears some how or other to have been substituted by
him, is that if by Voucher m be meant conclusive
evidence
the Books in question were never tendered
by me as already possessing any such character, quality, but writing to receive
it by means of the evidence testimony of this Mr Lloyd,
to be appended to them, in which shape soever it
might be the pleasure of the Board to receive it:
a pleasure which I had no possible means of learning,
but by without asking for it, a means which, unfortunately
for me, has hitherto proved insufficient.



Identifier: | JB/122/193/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

193

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in