JB/087/186/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/087/186/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<head>Indirect</head>
 
<note>Promulgation &sect; 16</note>
 
<head>&sect; 15. Facilitating the knowledge of the laws.</head><p>To give a separate article to the expedients of this<lb/>nature may be thought idle: for of what use can<lb/>any law be, it may be said, any farther than<lb/>it is known? <add>Even amongst the <del>most ignorant</del> weakest &amp; lowest of the people </add> What master of a family so foolish<lb/>and unreasonable, as to expect <del>that</del> a servant to obey <lb/>orders that have never been communicated to him?<lb/>[To this there is no making a reply, except by stating<lb/>the matter of fact, which unhappily is <del>that</del> too notorious<lb/>to be disputed] How is it to be supposed then<lb/>that when a legislator makes a law he would ever<lb/><sic>omitt</sic> to take any of those steps which are necessary<lb/>to its being known by those who are <del>to obey it</del> concerned <lb/>in it. Enactment and <add><del>a sufficient degree</del></add> <note>the requisite mode &amp;<lb/>degree of<lb/></note> promulgation must<lb/>in practise surely be inseparable: and in cases<lb/>where the former <del>has taken</del> is supposed to have taken<lb/>place it is nugatory to suppose the latter can<lb/>have been unattended to.]  To <del>state</del> <add>exhibit</add> a distinction<lb/>between <del>pr</del> enactment and promulgation, and to [<del>suggest</del> <add>propose</add><lb/> an] <del>addi</del> <add>call for</add> attention to the latter point in addition<lb/> to the former is surely <del>an idle</del> <add>a trifling</add> refinement<lb/>suggested by theory and unnecessary in practise.  The<lb/>case however is just the reverse.  Reason would <del>shew</del> <add>represent</add> <lb/>them as inseparable: but experience unhappily but too<lb/>general proves that <del>t</del> no two objects are more distinct.  <lb/><note>If</note>
</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:00, 22 January 2021

Click Here To Edit


Indirect

Promulgation § 16

§ 15. Facilitating the knowledge of the laws.

To give a separate article to the expedients of this
nature may be thought idle: for of what use can
any law be, it may be said, any farther than
it is known? Even amongst the most ignorant weakest & lowest of the people What master of a family so foolish
and unreasonable, as to expect that a servant to obey
orders that have never been communicated to him?
[To this there is no making a reply, except by stating
the matter of fact, which unhappily is that too notorious
to be disputed] How is it to be supposed then
that when a legislator makes a law he would ever
omitt to take any of those steps which are necessary
to its being known by those who are to obey it concerned
in it. Enactment and a sufficient degree the requisite mode &
degree of
promulgation must
in practise surely be inseparable: and in cases
where the former has taken is supposed to have taken
place it is nugatory to suppose the latter can
have been unattended to.] To state exhibit a distinction
between pr enactment and promulgation, and to [suggest propose
an] addi call for attention to the latter point in addition
to the former is surely an idle a trifling refinement
suggested by theory and unnecessary in practise. The
case however is just the reverse. Reason would shew represent
them as inseparable: but experience unhappily but too
general proves that t no two objects are more distinct.
If



















Identifier: | JB/087/186/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

186

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27711

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in