JB/122/288/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/288/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/288/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<p>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>J.B. to Mallet</note><lb/>(3) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Minutes no check</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>Transgressions against<lb/>which they might operate<lb/>on the way of which &#x2014;<lb/>but which are not likely<lb/>to be committed.</note></p> <p>To what probable or ordinary purpose should this secret<lb/>mode of registration <del>have</del> operate in the character of an efficient<lb/>course of responsibility.</p> <p><note>1. Transgressions punishable<lb/>by impeachment</note></p> <p>To the purpose of impeachment?  were the Members<lb/><add>for argument's sake</add> any or all of them <del>deserves <gap/></del> ambitious, ever so<lb/>eagerly ambitious of one illustration of that sort, it will <add>would</add><lb/>not be any very easy matter merely to <sic>shew</sic> by what<lb/>means they could afford themselves any <sic>takeable</sic> chance<lb/>of obtaining <add>gratifying</add> it.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>2. <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> punishable by<lb/><hi rend="underline">information</hi> in B.R.<lb/>Here against transgression<lb/>they could be<lb/>of little service for<lb/>1. The transgression would<lb/>not be entered.</note></p> <p>1. In such a case the Minutes would present no entry!<lb/>How should they?  Is it human nature for more to take<lb/>powers to make evidence against himself</p>  <p><note>2. Doubts whether<lb/>view of the Minutes<lb/>would be obtainable</note></p> <p>2. Suppose Minutes made, how are they to be come<lb/>at?  <del>Would</del> Onan Information would the King's Bench grant<lb/>an order for any such purpose? <add>command <del>self</del> any such self convicting act?</add> <unclear>that</unclear> to my expectation I must<lb/>confess: principles enough I know of that forbid it: and I know<lb/>of none that <gap/> it.</p> <p><note>3. <del>Information,</del> <add>Detention</add> is not<lb/>probable either from<lb/>Members or subordinates</note></p> <p>3. In the case of a supposed defamation, the <add>preliminary</add> rule<lb/>to <sic>shew</sic> cause, by what means <add>adequate efficient cause</add>is it to be produced?<lb/>None such can I descry.  On motion for Information, a<lb/>rule to <sic>shew</sic> cause is not granted but upon affidavits,<lb/>and though the facts were known to thousands not one could<lb/>be compelled to make us join in an affidavit for the testification<lb/>of it?  <del><gap/></del> On <add>For</add> this preliminary occasion, <add>whatever</add> the evidence<lb/>supposing any to come, need all of it have come from voluntary<lb/>hands <add>lips</add>: and these voluntary hands, in what <del>quarter</del> <add> region, superior or inferior</add> of the<lb/>office would they be to be looked for?</p>   
<p>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>J.B. to Mallet</note><lb/>(3) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Minutes no check</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>Transgressions against<lb/>which they might operate<lb/>on the way of which &#x2014;<lb/>but which are not likely<lb/>to be committed.</note></p> <p>To what probable or ordinary purpose should this secret<lb/>mode of registration <del>have</del> operate in the character of an efficient<lb/>check of responsibility.</p> <p><note>1. Transgressions punishable<lb/>by impeachment</note></p> <p>To the purpose of impeachment?  Were the Members<lb/><add>for argument's sake</add> any or all of them <del>desirous ever</del> ambitious, ever so<lb/>eagerly ambitious of one <unclear>illustration</unclear> of that sort, it will <add>would</add><lb/>not be any very easy matter merely to <sic>shew</sic> by what<lb/>means they could afford themselves any <sic>takeable</sic> chance<lb/>of obtaining <add>gratifying</add> it.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>2. <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> punishable by<lb/><hi rend="underline">information</hi> in B.R.<lb/>Here against transgression<lb/>they would be<lb/>of little service for<lb/>1. The transgression would<lb/>not be entered.</note></p> <p>1. In such a case the Minutes would present no entry!<lb/>How should they?  Is it human nature for man to take<lb/>powers to make evidence against himself</p>  <p><note>2. Doubts whether<lb/>view of the Minutes<lb/>would be obtainable</note></p> <p>2. Suppose Minutes made, how are they to be come<lb/>at?  <del>Would</del> On an Information would the King's Bench grant<lb/>an order for any such purpose? <add>command <del>self</del> any such self convicting act?</add> <unclear>But</unclear> to my expectation I must<lb/>confess: principles enough I know of that forbid it: and I know<lb/>of none that favour it.</p> <p><note>3. <del>Information,</del> <add>Deletion</add> is not<lb/>probable either from<lb/>Members or subordinates</note></p> <p>3. In the case of a supposed defamation, the <add>preliminary</add> rule<lb/>to <sic>shew</sic> cause, by what means <add>adequate efficient cause</add> is it to be produced?<lb/>None such can I descry.  On motion for Information, a<lb/>rule to <sic>shew</sic> cause is not granted but upon affidavits,<lb/>and though the facts were known to thousands not one could<lb/>be compelled to make us join in an affidavit for the testification<lb/>of it?  <del><gap/></del> On <add>For</add> this preliminary occasion, <add>whatever</add> the evidence<lb/>supposing any to come, need all of it have come from voluntary<lb/>hands <add>lips</add>: and these voluntary hands, in what <del>quarter</del> <add> region, superior or inferior</add> of the<lb/>office would they be to be looked for?</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:34, 25 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

10 Aug. 1808
J.B. to Mallet
(3) V. Irresponsibility
Minutes no check

5
Transgressions against
which they might operate
on the way of which —
but which are not likely
to be committed.

To what probable or ordinary purpose should this secret
mode of registration have operate in the character of an efficient
check of responsibility.

1. Transgressions punishable
by impeachment

To the purpose of impeachment? Were the Members
for argument's sake any or all of them desirous ever ambitious, ever so
eagerly ambitious of one illustration of that sort, it will would
not be any very easy matter merely to shew by what
means they could afford themselves any takeable chance
of obtaining gratifying it.

6
2. do punishable by
information in B.R.
Here against transgression
they would be
of little service for
1. The transgression would
not be entered.

1. In such a case the Minutes would present no entry!
How should they? Is it human nature for man to take
powers to make evidence against himself

2. Doubts whether
view of the Minutes
would be obtainable

2. Suppose Minutes made, how are they to be come
at? Would On an Information would the King's Bench grant
an order for any such purpose? command self any such self convicting act? But to my expectation I must
confess: principles enough I know of that forbid it: and I know
of none that favour it.

3. Information, Deletion is not
probable either from
Members or subordinates

3. In the case of a supposed defamation, the preliminary rule
to shew cause, by what means adequate efficient cause is it to be produced?
None such can I descry. On motion for Information, a
rule to shew cause is not granted but upon affidavits,
and though the facts were known to thousands not one could
be compelled to make us join in an affidavit for the testification
of it? On For this preliminary occasion, whatever the evidence
supposing any to come, need all of it have come from voluntary
hands lips: and these voluntary hands, in what quarter region, superior or inferior of the
office would they be to be looked for?




Identifier: | JB/122/288/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

288

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 5 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in