★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>13 July 1808 + 6<lb/><note>Query 5. Item 4</note></p> <p><note>Workmen's receipts<lb/>not necessary</note></p> <p>1. As to the <hi rend="underline">necessity</hi>.<lb/>1. Upon enquiry I am assured, by persons <add><del>in both | <!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>13 July 1808 + 6<lb/><note>Query 5. Item 4</note></p> <p><note>Workmen's receipts<lb/>not necessary</note></p> <p>1. As to the <hi rend="underline">necessity</hi>.<lb/>1. Upon enquiry I am assured, by persons <add><del>in both situations</del></add> who have<lb/>had ample experience that <add>in private service</add> it is <del>not <gap/> unnec</del><lb/>uncustomary and for aught they know without example,<lb/>for workmen at weekly wages <add>handicraft workmen <del>and</del> as these in question were,</add> to give, or for their<lb/>employers to require, <del>rec</del> <add>their signature to</add> written receipts for such<lb/>their wages.</p> <p>2. Upon enquiry I am assured, that it is equally<lb/>without example, in public service: and in particular,<lb/>and for example, in his Majesty's Dockyards.</p> <p>3. <del>T</del> On turning to the dates, <del>the</del> upon the face of the<lb/>Books in question themselves, it will appear that the mode<lb/><add>of entry</add> there employed, was employed long before I had received<lb/>the sum <add>of public money</add> in question: In this <add>anterior</add> part of the Books, no<lb/>traces appear of any receipt or acknowledgment on the<lb/>part of the Workmen: and the persons by whom the books<lb/>were kept are ready to declare that they never took or<lb/>required any. After the receipt of the public money<lb/>in question, the Accounts continue to be kept exactly<lb/>in the same way as before. No need of any difference being <!-- continues into the margin --> <del>suspect</del> by any person<lb/>whatever so much as<lb/>suspected, no difference<lb/>was made.<lb/>For my own part,<lb/>I never saw the<lb/>Books not any<lb/>of them, <sic>till</sic> for<lb/>the purpose of <add>rendering</add> this<lb/>Account it became<lb/>necessary for me to<lb/>enquire <del><gap/></del> what accounts<lb/>had been<lb/>kept and were to be<lb/>found.</p> <p>4. But, says <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector perhaps, when <del>you</del><lb/>the public money in question had been received by you,<lb/>then was the time for you to prepare for the giving account<lb/>of it, in a <del>proper manner</del> <add> suitable mode</add>, and to that mode<lb/>to accommodate the shape of <add>this part of</add> Your evidence: <del>with the</del> <add>and thereupon</add><lb/><del>furn</del> <add>it was that it became your duty to require, and obtain and</add> keep these receipts.</p> <p>My answer is — doubtless if, <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector<lb/>being at my elbow, he had favoured me with any such<lb/>intimation, adding <hi rend="underline">do this, or <del>I</del> your disbursements<lb/>will not, any of them, be allowed</hi> <del>and it had depended</del> <add>& if [+]<note>[+] having received such<lb/>intimation</note> it had been understood by me</add><lb/><del><gap/> to</del> <add>to depend upon</add> the pleasure of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspector to establish this<lb/>regulation in the character of a law <add>or rule</add> of evidence, <del>I should</del> <add>then I in</add><lb/> <add><del>either</del><lb/>in</add></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
13 July 1808 + 6
Query 5. Item 4
Workmen's receipts
not necessary
1. As to the necessity.
1. Upon enquiry I am assured, by persons in both situations who have
had ample experience that in private service it is not unnec
uncustomary and for aught they know without example,
for workmen at weekly wages handicraft workmen and as these in question were, to give, or for their
employers to require, rec their signature to written receipts for such
their wages.
2. Upon enquiry I am assured, that it is equally
without example, in public service: and in particular,
and for example, in his Majesty's Dockyards.
3. T On turning to the dates, the upon the face of the
Books in question themselves, it will appear that the mode
of entry there employed, was employed long before I had received
the sum of public money in question: In this anterior part of the Books, no
traces appear of any receipt or acknowledgment on the
part of the Workmen: and the persons by whom the books
were kept are ready to declare that they never took or
required any. After the receipt of the public money
in question, the Accounts continue to be kept exactly
in the same way as before. No need of any difference being suspect by any person
whatever so much as
suspected, no difference
was made.
For my own part,
I never saw the
Books not any
of them, till for
the purpose of rendering this
Account it became
necessary for me to
enquire what accounts
had been
kept and were to be
found.
4. But, says Mr Chief Inspector perhaps, when you
the public money in question had been received by you,
then was the time for you to prepare for the giving account
of it, in a proper manner suitable mode, and to that mode
to accommodate the shape of this part of Your evidence: with the and thereupon
furn it was that it became your duty to require, and obtain and keep these receipts.
My answer is — doubtless if, Mr Chief Inspector
being at my elbow, he had favoured me with any such
intimation, adding do this, or I your disbursements
will not, any of them, be allowed and it had depended & if [+][+] having received such
intimation it had been understood by me
to to depend upon the pleasure of Mr Chief Inspector to establish this
regulation in the character of a law or rule of evidence, I should then I in
either
in
Identifier: | JB/122/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1808-07-13 |
|||
122 |
Panopticon |
||
197 |
|||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D6 |
||
TH 1806 |
|||
Andre Morellet |
|||
1806 |
|||
001 |
|||