JB/122/330/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/330/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/330/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header in pencil --> <p>27 July 1808 + 11<lb/><note>Reasons against Vouchers &amp;c</note></p> <p>II. Secondly and lastly, as to the <del>virtual exclusion</del> <add>predilection in favour</add> of<lb/>contemporary Vouchers, to the virtual exclusion of subsequent<del>ial</del> and<lb/>succedaneous ones from the same source.</p> <p><del>II</del> If, for dispatch and saving of trouble <add>and <sic>expence</sic></add> ready written<lb/>declarations, signed by <del>the party</del> him, who in a trial<lb/><del>would be the witness,</del> <add>would have to testify them</add> <del>are preferred to other more trustworthy</del> <add>may with propriety be preferred to declarations</add><lb/><add>from the same person in the more trustworthy shapes above spoken of</add><lb/><del>evidence, being in ordinary <gap/> regarded</del><lb/><del>as sufficiently trustworthy</del> <add><del>may with propriety be admitted</del></add> to this special purpose <add><del>may be</del> if, on this special occasion</add> <del>be</del> <!-- continues into margin --><add>they may</add> with propriety admitted,<lb/>granting the propriety of this admitting, it should seem that<lb/>in default of these <hi rend="underline">contemporary</hi> evidences, if such<lb/>they may be called, other declarations to the same<lb/>effect, from the <hi rend="underline">same person</hi>, might <del>it should</del> <add><del>notwithstanding</del></add><lb/><del>seem</del> at any distance of time, unless in case of<lb/>special suspicion of fraud, <add>entertained</add> for special cause, be<lb/>with equal facility <del>be</del> accepted.  Fraud it is<lb/>true may have given rise to <add>evidences <del/><gap/></del> of</add> the <gap/> state:<lb/>but so may it to evidence <del>of</del> <add>in</add> the same shape<lb/>though contemporary with the transaction of which<lb/>they speak: for, <del>it is of evidence of this form</del> <add>for want of the <gap/> above spoken of</add> [+]1 <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> it is an essential<lb/>character of evidences<lb/>of this description to be</note><lb/><del>it is the essential character to be exposed to fraud</del><lb/><del>and to be suitable</del> liable to be employed as<lb/>instruments in the hand of fraud, and to be but<lb/><add>too</add> well adapted to that purpose.</p>     
<!-- header in pencil --> <p>27 July 1808 + 11<lb/><note>Reasons against Vouchers &amp;c</note></p> <p>II. Secondly and lastly, as to the <del>virtual exclusion</del> <add>predilection in favour</add> of<lb/>contemporary Vouchers, to the virtual exclusion of subsequent<del>ial</del> and<lb/>succedaneous ones from the same source.<lb/><del>II</del> If, for dispatch and saving of trouble <add>and <sic>expence</sic></add> ready written<lb/>declarations, signed by <del>the party</del> him, who in a trial<lb/><del>would be the witness,</del> <add>would have to testify them</add> <del>are preferred to other more trustworthy</del> <add>may with propriety be preferred to declarations</add><lb/><add>from the same person in the more trustworthy shapes above spoken of</add><lb/><del>evidence, being in ordinary cases regarded</del><lb/><del>as sufficiently trustworthy</del> <add><del>may with propriety be admitted</del></add> to this special purpose <add><del>may be</del> if, on this special occasion</add> <del>be</del> <!-- continues into margin --><add>they may</add> with propriety admitted,<lb/><add>granting the propriety of this admitting, it should seem that</add><lb/>in default of these <hi rend="underline">contemporary</hi> evidences, if such<lb/>they may be called, other declarations to the same<lb/>effect, from the <hi rend="underline">same person</hi>, might <del>it should</del> <add><del>notwithstanding</del></add><lb/><del>seem</del> at any distance of time, unless in case of<lb/>special suspicion of fraud, <add>entertained</add> for special cause, be<lb/>with equal facility <del>be</del> accepted.  Fraud it is<lb/>true may have given rise to <add>evidences <del>documents</del> of</add> the posterior date:<lb/>but so may it to evidence <del>of</del> <add>in</add> the same shape<lb/>though contemporary with the transaction of which<lb/>they speak: for, <del>it is of evidence of <add>in</add> this form</del> <add>for want of the securities above spoken of</add> [+]1 <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> it is an essential<lb/>character of evidences<lb/>of this description to be</note><lb/><del>it is the essential character to be exposed to fraud</del><lb/><del>and to be suitable</del> liable to be employed as<lb/>instruments in the hand of fraud, and to be but<lb/><add>too</add> well adapted to that purpose.</p>     






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:19, 3 February 2021

'Click Here To Edit

27 July 1808 + 11
Reasons against Vouchers &c

II. Secondly and lastly, as to the virtual exclusion predilection in favour of
contemporary Vouchers, to the virtual exclusion of subsequential and
succedaneous ones from the same source.
II If, for dispatch and saving of trouble and expence ready written
declarations, signed by the party him, who in a trial
would be the witness, would have to testify them are preferred to other more trustworthy may with propriety be preferred to declarations
from the same person in the more trustworthy shapes above spoken of
evidence, being in ordinary cases regarded
as sufficiently trustworthy may with propriety be admitted to this special purpose may be if, on this special occasion be they may with propriety admitted,
granting the propriety of this admitting, it should seem that
in default of these contemporary evidences, if such
they may be called, other declarations to the same
effect, from the same person, might it should notwithstanding
seem at any distance of time, unless in case of
special suspicion of fraud, entertained for special cause, be
with equal facility be accepted. Fraud it is
true may have given rise to evidences documents of the posterior date:
but so may it to evidence of in the same shape
though contemporary with the transaction of which
they speak: for, it is of evidence of in this form for want of the securities above spoken of [+]1 [+]1 it is an essential
character of evidences
of this description to be

it is the essential character to be exposed to fraud
and to be suitable liable to be employed as
instruments in the hand of fraud, and to be but
too well adapted to that purpose.




Identifier: | JB/122/330/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

330

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D11

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in