JB/122/362/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/362/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<p>21 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1812 + 2<lb/>Evidence <note><sic>Ch.</sic> <add><gap/></add> False Security Oath</note><lb/>2 <note>&sect;&sect;.1. Why <hi rend="underline">false</hi></note></p> <p><note>2<lb/>Confidence here<lb/>chiefly as while<lb/>as an instrument<lb/>of government &#x2014;<lb/>By <add>doing</add> <del>receipt</del> at<lb/>most allowed, not<lb/>commanded.</note></p> <!-- all text crossed through in pencil --> <p>In the <del>character of an</del> only character in which it is<lb/><hi rend="underline">here</hi> considered as employed &#x2014; in the character of an instrument<lb/>of government ill effects on the <del>temporal</del><lb/>welfare of society in the present life <gap/>, <add>on the present <del><gap/></del> occasion,</add> the first<lb/>at least, <del>if not</del> <add>or rather</add> the only place.  <add>In the religion of James</add> Howsoever it may<lb/>be supposed, that <!-- brackets in pencil --><del>[in the religion of James]</del> the employment<lb/>of <del>this</del> <add>the</add> instrument <add>in the character</add> is <hi rend="underline">allowed of</hi>, by no <del><gap/></del> <add>man surely</add> has<lb/><add>any such supposition been entertained</add> <del>it now been supposed, of it that it was commended</del><lb/>that, in any case, it has been rendered any man has been<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/> of</del> <add>laid under</add> <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi> to employ it.</p> <p><note>3<lb/>For some reason<lb/>impunity, of the principle<lb/>put last<lb/><add>the</add> mischiefs past.</note></p> <p>Of the <del>absurd impunity so <gap/> in the principle</del> <add><hi rend="underline">incongruity</hi>, to me no stronger <gap/> at present</add><lb/>of the <del>incongruity involved</del> radical and irremediable incongruity,<lb/><del>of<d/el> <add>involved in</add> the supposition, in which the practice has its root,<lb/>(the almighty sovereign an assuredly obsequious instrument in the<lb/>hand of every earthly <gap/> )<lb/> mention <del>will not</del> <add> can not <del>can not</del> here be altogether omitted; <del>but</del> <add>though</add> for the<lb/>reason just given, its station, <add> when it comes to be spoken to more particularly,</add> will be best in the <del>second</del> <add>background</add> <lb/><del>place.</del></p> <p><del>The</del> <add>In the order of importance, the</add> <hi rend="underline">mischief,</hi> of which in so many shapes it<lb/>will be seen to be productive, demands the first place.<lb/>As to the production of <hi rend="underline">good</hi> in any shape, <del>its <gap/></del> <add>its incapacity &#x2014;</add><lb/><del>incapacity</del> <add>its utter incapacity</add> when standing by itself, will, for the proof<lb/>of it, require, in this place <del>b</del> at least, but few words.</p>       
<p>21 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1812 + 2<lb/>Evidence <note><sic>Ch.</sic> <add><gap/></add> False Security Oath</note><lb/>2 <note>&sect;&sect;.1. Why <hi rend="underline">false</hi></note></p> <p><note>2<lb/>Considered here<lb/>chiefly as solely<lb/>as an instrument<lb/>of government &#x2014;<lb/>By <add>doing</add> <del>receipt</del> almost<lb/> <hi rend="underline">allowed</hi>, not<lb/><hi rend="underline">commanded</hi>.</note></p> <!-- all text crossed through in pencil --> <p>In the <del>character of an</del> only character in which it is<lb/><hi rend="underline">here</hi> considered as employed &#x2014; in the character of an instrument<lb/>of government &#x2014; its effects on the <del>temporal</del><lb/>welfare of society in the present life <unclear>discerned</unclear>, <add>on the present <del><gap/></del> occasion,</add> the first<lb/>at least, <del>if not</del> <add>or rather</add> the only place.  <add>In the religion of James,</add> Howsoever it may<lb/>be supposed, that <!-- brackets in pencil --><del>[in the religion of James]</del> the employment<lb/>of <del>this</del> <add>the</add> instrument <add>in this character</add> is <hi rend="underline">allowed of</hi>, by no <del><gap/></del> <add>man surely</add> has<lb/><add>any such supposition been entertained</add> <del>it now been supposed, of it that it was commended</del><lb/>that, in any case, it has been rendered any man has been<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/> of</del> <add>laid under</add> <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi> to employ it.</p> <p><note>3<lb/>For some reason<lb/>impunity, if the principle<lb/>put last<lb/><add>the</add> mischiefs part.</note></p> <p>Of the <del>absurd impunity so <gap/> in the principle</del> <add><hi rend="underline">incongruity</hi>, to use no stronger form at present</add><lb/>of the <del>incongruity involved</del> radical and irremediable incongruity,<lb/><del>of</del> <add>involved in</add> the supposition, in which the practice has its root,<lb/><add>(the almighty sovereign an assuredly obsequious instrument in the<lb/>hand of every earthly potentate.)</add><lb/> mention <del>will not</del> <add> can not <del>can not</del></add> here be altogether omitted; <del>but</del> <add>though</add> for the<lb/>reason just given, its station, <add> when it comes to be spoken to more particularly,</add> will be but in the <del>second</del> <add>background</add> <lb/><del>place.</del></p> <p><del>The</del> <add>In the order of importance, the</add> <hi rend="underline">mischief,</hi> of which in so many shapes it<lb/>will be seen to be productive, demands the first place.<lb/>As to the production of <hi rend="underline">good</hi> in any shape, <del>its utter</del> <add>its incapacity &#x2014;</add><lb/><del>incapacity</del> <add>its utter incapacity</add> when standing by itself, will, for the proof<lb/>of it, require, in this place <del>b</del> at least, but few words.</p>       




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:31, 15 February 2021

'Click Here To Edit

21 Jany 1812 + 2
Evidence Ch. False Security Oath
2 §§.1. Why false

2
Considered here
chiefly as solely
as an instrument
of government —
By doing receipt almost
allowed, not
commanded.

In the character of an only character in which it is
here considered as employed — in the character of an instrument
of government — its effects on the temporal
welfare of society in the present life discerned, on the present occasion, the first
at least, if not or rather the only place. In the religion of James, Howsoever it may
be supposed, that [in the religion of James] the employment
of this the instrument in this character is allowed of, by no man surely has
any such supposition been entertained it now been supposed, of it that it was commended
that, in any case, it has been rendered any man has been
of laid under obligation to employ it.

3
For some reason
impunity, if the principle
put last
the mischiefs part.

Of the absurd impunity so in the principle incongruity, to use no stronger form at present
of the incongruity involved radical and irremediable incongruity,
of involved in the supposition, in which the practice has its root,
(the almighty sovereign an assuredly obsequious instrument in the
hand of every earthly potentate.)

mention will not can not can not here be altogether omitted; but though for the
reason just given, its station, when it comes to be spoken to more particularly, will be but in the second background
place.

The In the order of importance, the mischief, of which in so many shapes it
will be seen to be productive, demands the first place.
As to the production of good in any shape, its utter its incapacity —
incapacity its utter incapacity when standing by itself, will, for the proof
of it, require, in this place b at least, but few words.



Identifier: | JB/122/362/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

362

Info in main headings field

Panopticon - Compensation Claim

Image

002

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

A2

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

002

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in