JB/122/399/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/399/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/399/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->
<p>11 May 1813 + 4<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III. Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect;.7. Other Rates</note><lb/>2 <note>1. Pennsylvania</note></p> <p><del>6.  In</del></del> <add>Absolutely considered, to<lb/>the purpose here in question the <del>absolute</del> <hi rend="underline">sums</hi><lb/>will not be found material: their relation to each other<lb/>is all that bears upon the present case.</p> <p>1. The expenses being £2154:17:7. suppose the<lb/>receipts exactly equal: applying this to the case<lb?>of the Claimant's prison, the cost of it being thus<lb/>defrayed by the <del>labour</del> profit in the labour of the prisoners,<lb/>the <sic>headmoney</sic>, £12,000 a year would have<lb/>been <del><gap/</del> net profit.</p> <p>2. But, instead of being no more than equal to the<lb/>expenses, viz 2154:17<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>:7<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <del>they</del> the receipts were<lb/>"2457:6<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>:3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> at this rate, as the former of these<lb/>two sums is <del>t</del> to the latter, so would £12,000 a<lb/>year be to the number expressive of the <del>number</del> <add>sought: viz the number</add><lb/><del>qua</del> annual quantity of <add>net</add> profit <del><gap/> at this</del> <add>whilst at this rate</add><lb/><del>rate: viz. £13684:9:9 1/4</del> <add>would have accrued to the instructing Manager, viz</add> &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; £13,684:9:9 1/4</p> <p.3. Multiplied by the common multiplier 24 1/2, expressive<lb/>of the number of years, this gives for the compensation<lb/>money due according to this rate &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; £335,269:19:4 1/2</p>   
<p>11 May 1813 + 4<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III. Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect;.7. Other Rates</note><lb/>2 <note>1. Pennsylvania</note></p> <p><del>6.  In</del> <add>Absolutely considered, to</add> the purpose here in question the <del>absolute</del> <hi rend="underline">sums</hi><lb/>will not be found material: their relation to each other<lb/>is all that bears upon the present case.</p> <p>1. The expenses being £2154:17:7. suppose the<lb/>receipts exactly equal: applying this to the case<lb/>of the Claimant's prison, the cost of it being thus<lb/>defrayed by the <del>labour</del> profit on the labour of the prisoners,<lb/>the <sic>headmoney</sic>, £12,000 a year would have<lb/>been <del><gap/></del> net profit.</p> <p>2. But, instead of being no more than equal to the<lb/>expenses, viz 2154:17<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>:7<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <del>they</del> the Receipts were<lb/>£2457:6<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>:3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> at this rate, as the former of these<lb/>two sums is <del>t</del> to the latter, so would £12,000 a<lb/>year be to the number <add>sought: viz the number</add> expressive of the <del>number</del> <lb/><del>qua</del> annual quantity of <add>net</add> profit <del>accruing at this</del> <add>which at this rate</add><lb/><del>rate: viz. £13684:9:9 1/4</del> <add>would have accrued to the Contracting Manager, viz</add> &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; £13,684:9:9 1/4</p> <p>3. Multiplied by the common multiplier 24 1/2, expressive<lb/>of the number of Years, this gives for the compensation<lb/>money due according to this rate &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; £335,269:19:4 1/2</p>   




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:21, 12 March 2021

'Click Here To Edit

11 May 1813 + 4
Panopt. Compensation Claim III. Contract
§§.7. Other Rates

2 1. Pennsylvania

6. In Absolutely considered, to the purpose here in question the absolute sums
will not be found material: their relation to each other
is all that bears upon the present case.

1. The expenses being £2154:17:7. suppose the
receipts exactly equal: applying this to the case
of the Claimant's prison, the cost of it being thus
defrayed by the labour profit on the labour of the prisoners,
the headmoney, £12,000 a year would have
been net profit.

2. But, instead of being no more than equal to the
expenses, viz 2154:17s:7d they the Receipts were
£2457:6s:3d at this rate, as the former of these
two sums is t to the latter, so would £12,000 a
year be to the number sought: viz the number expressive of the number
qua annual quantity of net profit accruing at this which at this rate
rate: viz. £13684:9:9 1/4 would have accrued to the Contracting Manager, viz — — — — £13,684:9:9 1/4

3. Multiplied by the common multiplier 24 1/2, expressive
of the number of Years, this gives for the compensation
money due according to this rate — — — £335,269:19:4 1/2



Identifier: | JB/122/399/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

399

Info in main headings field

Panopt. Compensation Claim

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D4 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

<…> Co

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in