JB/122/404/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/404/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<!-- header and marginal calculations in pencil -->
<!-- header and marginal calculations in pencil -->


<p>12 May 1813 9<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect; Other Rates</note><lb/>(2 <note>3. New York 1802</p> <p><note><del>24,749:34<lb/><hi rend="underline">21,874:43</hi>2,874.91</del></note></p> <p><note>26,784.66<lb/><hi rend="underline">21,874:43</hi><lb/>5,874:23</note></p> <p>From this total of <sic>Expence</sic> deduct net profit, as above<lb/>Remains Balance on the side of <sic>expence</sic> <del><gap/></del> 5,874:23</p> <p>In this <del>case</del> <add>Account</add>, as in the first <del>case in</del> <add>mentioned</add> of these illustrative Accounts,<lb/>to <del>Th</del> apply <del>this</del> <add>the</add> <hi rend="underline">data</hi> to the case of the Claimants intended<lb/>prison &#x2014;<lb/>Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal<lb/>to the expenses, <del>and</del> the same equality being supposed<lb/>to have place in the case of the Claimant's<lb/>prison, <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of prisoners 1,000, <del>his</del> <add>the</add> allowance, made to<lb/>him <del>was for the sum £12,000 a year</del> <add>for that number viz. at £12 a head</add> would<lb/>have been, the whole of it, so much net profit.<lb/>But, instead of being equal, <del>viz as 2</del> <add> i.e.</add> each of them<lb/>to the other as <del>24,749:34 to 24,749:34</del> <add>26,748:66 to 26,748:66,</add> the receipts<lb/>are to the <sic>expences</sic> but as 21,874:43 to<lb/><del>24,749:34</del> <add>26,748:66 [+]</add> <note>[+] the <sic>expences</sic><lb/>to the receipts<lb/>As these two sums<lb/>inversely:</note> therefore as <del>24,79 24,749:34<d/el. <Add>26,748:66</add> is to<lb/>21,874:43, so is 312,000 to the number sought,<lb/><del>viz</del> being the number expressive of the <del>net</del> annual quantity<lb/>of net profit, which at this rate would have accrued<lb/><del>to the Contracting Manager</del> <add>to the Claimant in his quality of Manager, contracting on the<lb/>above Terms &#x2014; viz........9,813:9:0.<lb/.Multiplied by the common multiplier, 24 1/2, expressive<lb/>of the number of years, this gives for the<lb/> compensation <gap/> due according to this rule<lb/>£240,418:0:0.</p> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><note></del>&#9758; Note the<lb/>probable under<lb/>estimate.</del></note></p> <p>In the <del>Account<d/el> <Add>report</add> of the <add>same</add> Year 1802, <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] in an Account<lb/>printed on the back<lb/>of p.3</note> the following <del>is</del> <add>are</add><lb/><del>the account given of</del> <add>among the Statements made in relation to</add> the number of the prisoners<lb/>1."Remaining in prison 31 <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <add>on 12 <sic>Mo.</sic>" <add>(i.e.</add> 1801" &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; 345<lb/>2 "Remaining in prison on 12 <sic>Mo</sic>" (i.e. 31 <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic>) "1802" 404<lb/.Days of entrance and departure not being specified, the average<lb/>number for the whole year must be assumed to be the<lb/>medium between these two numbers, viz. &#x2014; &#x2014; 374 1/2</p>
<p>12 May 1813 9<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect; Other Rates</note><lb/>(2 <note>3. New York 1802</note></p> <p><note><del>24,749:34<lb/><hi rend="underline">21,874:43</hi></del><lb/>2,874.91</note></p> <p><note>26,784.66<lb/><hi rend="underline">21,874:43</hi><lb/>5,874:23</note></p> <p>From this total of <sic>Expence</sic> deduct net profit, as above<lb/>Remains Balance on the side of <sic>expence</sic> <del><gap/></del> 5,874:23</p> <p>In this <del>case</del> <add>Account</add>, as in the first <del>case in</del> <add>mentioned</add> of these illustrative Accounts,<lb/>to <del>Th</del> apply <del>this</del> <add>the</add> <hi rend="underline">data</hi> to the case of the Claimants intended<lb/>prison &#x2014;<lb/>Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal<lb/>to the expenses, <del>and</del> the same equality being supposed<lb/>to have place in the case of the Claimant's<lb/>prison, <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of prisoners 1,000, <del>his</del> <add>the</add> allowance, made to<lb/>him <del>was for the men, £12,000 a year</del> <add>for that number viz. at £12 a head</add> would<lb/>have been, the whole of it, so much net profit.<lb/>But, instead of being equal, <del>viz as 2</del> <add> i.e.</add> each of them<lb/>to the other as <del>24,749:34 to 24,749:34</del> <add>26,748:66 to 26,748:66,</add> the receipts<lb/>are to the <sic>expences</sic> but as 21,874:43 to<lb/><del>24,749:34</del> <add>26,748:66 [+]</add> <note>[+] the <sic>expences</sic><lb/>to the receipts<lb/>as these two sums<lb/>inversely:</note> therefore as <del>24,79 24,749:34</del> <add>26,748:66</add> is to<lb/>21,874:43, so is £12,000 to the number sought,<lb/><del>viz</del> being the number expressive of the <del>net</del> annual quantity<lb/>of net profit, which at this rate would have accrued<lb/><del>to the Contracting Manager &#x2014; the Cl</del> <add>to the Claimant in his quality of Manager, contracting on the<lb/>above Terms &#x2014; viz........ </add> 9,813:9:0.<lb/>Multiplied by the common multiplier, 24 1/2, expressive<lb/>of the number of years, this gives for the<lb/> compensation money due according to this rule<lb/>£240,418:0:0.</p> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><note><del>&#9758; Note the<lb/>probable under<lb/>estimate.</del></note></p> <p>In the <del>Account</del> <add>Report</add> of the <add>same</add> Year 1802, <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] in an Account<lb/>printed on the back<lb/>of p.3</note> the following <del>is</del> <add>are</add><lb/><del>the account given of</del> <add>among the Statements made in relation to</add> the number of the prisoners<lb/>1."Remaining in prison 31 <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <add>on 12 <sic>Mo.</sic>" (i.e.</add> 1801" &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; 345<lb/>2 "Remaining in prison on 12 <sic>Mo</sic>" (i.e. 31 <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic>) "1802" 404</p> <p>Days of entrance and departure not being specified, the average<lb/>number for the whole year must be assumed to be the<lb/>medium between these two numbers, viz. &#x2014; &#x2014; 374 1/2</p> <!-- marginal calculation in pencil --> <p><note>404<lb/><hi rend="underline">345</hi><lb/>2|59<lb/>29 1/2<lb/><hi rend="underline">345</hi><lb/>374 1/2</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:24, 12 March 2021

'Click Here To Edit


12 May 1813 9
Panopt. Compensation Claim III Contract
§§ Other Rates

(2 3. New York 1802

24,749:34
21,874:43

2,874.91

26,784.66
21,874:43
5,874:23

From this total of Expence deduct net profit, as above
Remains Balance on the side of expence 5,874:23

In this case Account, as in the first case in mentioned of these illustrative Accounts,
to Th apply this the data to the case of the Claimants intended
prison —
Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal
to the expenses, and the same equality being supposed
to have place in the case of the Claimant's
prison, No of prisoners 1,000, his the allowance, made to
him was for the men, £12,000 a year for that number viz. at £12 a head would
have been, the whole of it, so much net profit.
But, instead of being equal, viz as 2 i.e. each of them
to the other as 24,749:34 to 24,749:34 26,748:66 to 26,748:66, the receipts
are to the expences but as 21,874:43 to
24,749:34 26,748:66 [+] [+] the expences
to the receipts
as these two sums
inversely:
therefore as 24,79 24,749:34 26,748:66 is to
21,874:43, so is £12,000 to the number sought,
viz being the number expressive of the net annual quantity
of net profit, which at this rate would have accrued
to the Contracting Manager — the Cl to the Claimant in his quality of Manager, contracting on the
above Terms — viz........
9,813:9:0.
Multiplied by the common multiplier, 24 1/2, expressive
of the number of years, this gives for the
compensation money due according to this rule
£240,418:0:0.

☞ Note the
probable under
estimate.

In the Account Report of the same Year 1802, [+] [+] in an Account
printed on the back
of p.3
the following is are
the account given of among the Statements made in relation to the number of the prisoners
1."Remaining in prison 31 Decr on 12 Mo." (i.e. 1801" — — — 345
2 "Remaining in prison on 12 Mo" (i.e. 31 Decr.) "1802" 404

Days of entrance and departure not being specified, the average
number for the whole year must be assumed to be the
medium between these two numbers, viz. — — 374 1/2

404
345
2|59
29 1/2
345
374 1/2



Identifier: | JB/122/404/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

404

Info in main headings field

Panopt. Compensation Claim

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D9 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

<…> Co

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in