JB/124/020/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/124/020/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->


<p>6<lb/><note>Preliminary</note> Panopticon Bill</p> <p>In some instances <del>they</del> <add>their reasons</add> will perhaps be observed<lb/>to be of a wider <del>pattern</del> <add>extent</add> than the clauses to which<lb/>they apply.  This, if it should be the case, will be<lb/>rather unfortunate: but reasons are stubborn things,<lb/>and must be taken as they come.  They grow out<lb/>of the nature of things, and can not be cut down<lb/>to a pattern as the clauses themselves may. What<lb/>depended up[on me in this respect, <add>I</add> has <del>been</del> done.<lb/>Care has <add>all along</add> been taken that the exacting clause itself<lb/>shall not go a hair's breadth beyond the subject-matter<lb/>of the Bill.  <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] Though the reason<lb/>be such as seems<lb/>to cover the whole<lb/><del>surface of the law</del><lb/>field of legislation,<lb/>the</note> <del>The</del> circle that bounds the<lb/>Panopticon includes all the innovations I have<lb/>presumed to <del>think of</del> <add>make</add> this caution I made a<lb/>point of observing not only to avoid <add>the danger of</add> calling<lb/>up <Add>merited</add> opposition by the attempt to steal in <Add>an extensive</add> <del>a great</del><lb/>general measure under the cloak of a particular<lb/>one, but to avoid the incongruity of<lb/>putting a law in a place where nobody would<lb/><del>expect to find it.</del> be prepared to look for it.<hi rend="superscript">ǂ</hi></p> <!-- line across the page in ink --> <p><head>Note</head><lb/><hi rend="superscript">ǂ</hi> Instances are, the reasons for restoring <del>the</del> competency<lb/>to the testimony of Penitentiary-Men: those<lb/>for dispensing with the Statute of Apprenticeships<lb/>in their favour,  <del>In all the</del> and <del>many</del> <add>several</add> others.  In<lb/>all these instances, <del><gap/></del> howsoever <hi rend="underline">repeal</hi> may<lb/>appear the <hi rend="underline">obvious</hi> conclusion, I have confined<lb/>myself to <hi rend="underline">dispensation</hi>, as being the only <hi rend="underline">pertinent</hi><lb/>one.</p>
<p>6<lb/><note>Preliminary</note> Panopticon Bill</p> <p>In some instances <del>they</del> <add>their reasons</add> will perhaps be observed<lb/>to be of a wider <del>pattern</del> <add>extent</add> than the clauses to which<lb/>they apply.  This, if it should be the case, will be<lb/>rather unfortunate: but reasons are stubborn things,<lb/>and must be taken as they come.  They grow out<lb/>of the nature of things, and can not be cut down<lb/>to a pattern as the clauses themselves may. What<lb/>depended upon me in this respect, <add>I</add> has <del>been</del> done.<lb/>Care has <add>all along</add> been taken that the exacting clause itself<lb/>shall not go a hair's breadth beyond the subject-matter<lb/>of the Bill.  <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] Though the reason<lb/>be such as seems<lb/>to cover the whole<lb/><del>surface of the law</del><lb/>field of legislation,<lb/>the</note> <del>The</del> circle that bounds the<lb/>Panopticon includes all the innovations I have<lb/>presumed to <del>think of</del> <add>make</add> this caution I made a<lb/>point of observing not only to avoid <add>the danger of</add> calling<lb/>up <Add>merited</add> opposition by the attempt to steal in <Add>an extensive</add> <del>a great</del><lb/>general measure under the cloak of a particular<lb/>one, but to avoid the incongruity of<lb/>putting a law in a place where nobody would<lb/><del>expect to find it.</del> be prepared to look for it.<hi rend="superscript">ǂ</hi></p> <!-- line across the page in ink --> <p>Note<lb/><hi rend="superscript">ǂ</hi> Instances are, the reasons for restoring <del>the</del> competency<lb/>to the testimony of Penitentiary-Men: those<lb/>for dispensing with the Statute of Apprenticeships<lb/>in their favour,  <del>In all the</del> and <del>many</del> <add>several</add> others.  In<lb/>all these instances, <del><gap/></del> howsoever <hi rend="underline">repeal</hi> may<lb/>appear the <hi rend="underline">obvious</hi> conclusion, I have confined<lb/>myself to <hi rend="underline">dispensation</hi>, as being the only <hi rend="underline">pertinent</hi><lb/>one.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:33, 23 April 2021

Click Here To Edit


6
Preliminary Panopticon Bill

In some instances they their reasons will perhaps be observed
to be of a wider pattern extent than the clauses to which
they apply. This, if it should be the case, will be
rather unfortunate: but reasons are stubborn things,
and must be taken as they come. They grow out
of the nature of things, and can not be cut down
to a pattern as the clauses themselves may. What
depended upon me in this respect, I has been done.
Care has all along been taken that the exacting clause itself
shall not go a hair's breadth beyond the subject-matter
of the Bill. [+] [+] Though the reason
be such as seems
to cover the whole
surface of the law
field of legislation,
the
The circle that bounds the
Panopticon includes all the innovations I have
presumed to think of make this caution I made a
point of observing not only to avoid the danger of calling
up merited opposition by the attempt to steal in an extensive a great
general measure under the cloak of a particular
one, but to avoid the incongruity of
putting a law in a place where nobody would
expect to find it. be prepared to look for it.ǂ

Note
ǂ Instances are, the reasons for restoring the competency
to the testimony of Penitentiary-Men: those
for dispensing with the Statute of Apprenticeships
in their favour, In all the and many several others. In
all these instances, howsoever repeal may
appear the obvious conclusion, I have confined
myself to dispensation, as being the only pertinent
one.



Identifier: | JB/124/020/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

124

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill

Image

002

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / d6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41709

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in