JB/081/185/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/185/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>instance affected to be disapproved by<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Blackstone.  But in that instance compared<lb/>
 
with this, the scale is that of a garden<lb/>
 
pot to that of a field.</p>
 
<p>Bidding thus high for perjury<lb/>
is it possible that of the same same man it<lb/>
should be the sincere with to prevent it?</p>
<p>What then, (says somebody,) <lb/>
the fear of punishment at the hands of the<lb/>
Almighty &#x2014; is it to be set down as nothing?<lb/>
The answer is &#x2014; yes:  on this particular occasion,<lb/>
as amounting absolutely to nothing<lb/>
but of this presently</p>
<p>By the inducting of these<lb/>
same Reverend, Right Reverend, and Most<lb/>
Reverend, self styled Perjurers (for so they<lb/>
are specially declared to be by these their<lb/>
own statutes,) has been established the<lb/>
National School of Church of England<lb/>
Orthodoxy.</p>
<p>These things considered, and <lb/>
the use made of oaths on Judicial occasions,<lb/>
&#x2014; Westminster Hall, not to mention its<lb/>
near neighbourhood, may it not be stiled<lb/>
the great national school of perjury?</p>
What then, (says somebody,)<lb/>
are all <hi rend="underline">tests</hi> meant to be thus condemned?<lb/>
<p>Oh no:  tests, for declarations of the party joined,<lb/>
by a man, on this or that occasion may<lb/>
be useful:  useful and even necessary, and<lb/>
at any rate unexceptionable:  in some<lb/>
cases by acceptance, in other cases by</p>
<p>12.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Judicature, with it's expensive prosecution<lb/>
and severer punishments.  Why? because,<lb/>
while the mode of elicitation employed is<lb/>
such as needs not the assistance of the ceremony,<lb/>
it's mode of procedure is such, as is<lb/>
able to cause the punishment to follow instantaneously<lb/>
upon the offence.  Yet, has it as yet<lb/>
a weakness, to which consistency will one<lb/>
day, it is hoped, apply the obvious remedy.<lb/>
Standing at the highest pitch at the commencement<lb/>
of each Parliament, it sinks (this <lb/>
indispensable power,) as the Parliament<lb/>
advances in age, till at last it is such in<lb/>
utter decrepitude.</p>
<p>After such a demonstration <lb/>
of the needlessness of this ceremony, but<lb/>
for the importance and novelty of the subject,<lb/>
other proofs might be put aside, as being themselves<lb/>
needless:  important the subject may<lb/>
well be stiled, or no other is so:  for, so<lb/>
long as this ceremony has place, Justice, to<lb/>
the prodigious extent that will be seen, is<lb/>
absolutely incapable of having place.</p>
<p>To the benefit of the testimony<lb/>
of Quakers, ever since the year 1696, Justice<lb/>
has, without the benefit of this ceremony,<lb/>
by various Statutes, been admitted, in cases<lb/>
called <hi rend="underline">Civil cases:</hi>  and now, by a statute of<lb/>
1828, in cases called <hi rend="underline">Criminal</hi> and <hi rend="underline">penal</hi><lb/>
cases.  If then, as a security against mendacity,<lb/>
the ceremony is indispensable in the</p>
<p>5.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:14, 30 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

instance affected to be disapproved by
Blackstone. But in that instance compared
with this, the scale is that of a garden
pot to that of a field.

Bidding thus high for perjury
is it possible that of the same same man it
should be the sincere with to prevent it?

What then, (says somebody,)
the fear of punishment at the hands of the
Almighty — is it to be set down as nothing?
The answer is — yes: on this particular occasion,
as amounting absolutely to nothing
but of this presently

By the inducting of these
same Reverend, Right Reverend, and Most
Reverend, self styled Perjurers (for so they
are specially declared to be by these their
own statutes,) has been established the
National School of Church of England
Orthodoxy.

These things considered, and
the use made of oaths on Judicial occasions,
— Westminster Hall, not to mention its
near neighbourhood, may it not be stiled
the great national school of perjury?

What then, (says somebody,)
are all tests meant to be thus condemned?

Oh no: tests, for declarations of the party joined,
by a man, on this or that occasion may
be useful: useful and even necessary, and
at any rate unexceptionable: in some
cases by acceptance, in other cases by

12.


---page break---

Judicature, with it's expensive prosecution
and severer punishments. Why? because,
while the mode of elicitation employed is
such as needs not the assistance of the ceremony,
it's mode of procedure is such, as is
able to cause the punishment to follow instantaneously
upon the offence. Yet, has it as yet
a weakness, to which consistency will one
day, it is hoped, apply the obvious remedy.
Standing at the highest pitch at the commencement
of each Parliament, it sinks (this
indispensable power,) as the Parliament
advances in age, till at last it is such in
utter decrepitude.

After such a demonstration
of the needlessness of this ceremony, but
for the importance and novelty of the subject,
other proofs might be put aside, as being themselves
needless: important the subject may
well be stiled, or no other is so: for, so
long as this ceremony has place, Justice, to
the prodigious extent that will be seen, is
absolutely incapable of having place.

To the benefit of the testimony
of Quakers, ever since the year 1696, Justice
has, without the benefit of this ceremony,
by various Statutes, been admitted, in cases
called Civil cases: and now, by a statute of
1828, in cases called Criminal and penal
cases. If then, as a security against mendacity,
the ceremony is indispensable in the

5.


Identifier: | JB/081/185/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

185

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / c6 / c11 / c12

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25972

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in