★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<!-- header in pencil --> | <!-- header in pencil --> | ||
<p>1<lb/>Panopticon Bill <note>Reasons</note></p> <p><del>II. Objections to a valuation new <foreign><hi rend="underline">in toto</hi></foreign>, in contradistinction to the assessment of a supplemental<lb/>price. — or</del></p> <p>II. Reasons for proposing the assessment of a<lb/>supplemental price, in preference to a valuation<lb/>new <foreign><hi rend="underline">in toto</hi></foreign>.</p> <p>What every body knows is that for the purpose<lb/>of the formerly included Penitentiary Establishment<lb/>the value of the land has been already <del>That ver</del> <add> found. The</add><lb/>verdict <add>by which it was found</add> must, <sic>till</sic> some objection be made to it be<lb/>taken for a true one. I mean, <Add>always</add> a true one <del>a</del><lb/>for the <hi rend="underline">time</hi>. <del>at which it was given.</del></p> <p><del>Taking that verdict then for a true one at the<lb/>time, if</del> <add>If then on the part of the Proprietors</add> a fresh verdict be demanded, it can<lb/>only be on <del>one or other of two grounds</del> the ground<lb/>of one or other of two <del>allegations</del> suppositions</p> <p>1. That though a true verdict for that time, it<lb/>would not be a true verdict for this: for that the<lb/>£6600, if <del>p la</del> paid and laid out now, would<lb/>not go so far as it would have done had it<lb/>been paid and laid out then. This I <sic>admitt</sic>:<lb/><add>and</add></p> | <p>1<lb/>Panopticon Bill <note>Reasons</note></p> <p><del>II. Objections to a valuation new <foreign><hi rend="underline">in toto</hi></foreign>, in<lb/>contradistinction to the assessment of a supplemental<lb/>price. — or</del></p> <p>II. Reasons for proposing the assessment of a<lb/>supplemental price, in preference to a valuation<lb/>new <foreign><hi rend="underline">in toto</hi></foreign>.</p> <p>What every body knows is that for the purpose<lb/>of the formerly included Penitentiary Establishment<lb/>the value of the land has been already <del>That ver</del> <add> found. The</add><lb/>verdict <add>by which it was found</add> must, <sic>till</sic> some objection be made to it be<lb/>taken for a true one. I mean, <Add>always</add> a true one <del>a</del><lb/>for the <hi rend="underline">time</hi>. <del>at which it was given.</del></p> <p><del>Taking that verdict then for a true one at the<lb/>time, if</del> <add>If then on the part of the Proprietors</add> a fresh verdict be demanded, it can<lb/>only be on <del>one or other of two grounds</del> the ground<lb/>of one or other of two <del>allegations</del> suppositions</p> <p>1. That though a true verdict for that time, it<lb/>would not be a true verdict for this: for that the<lb/>£6600, if <del>p la</del> paid and laid out now, would<lb/>not go so far as it would have done had it<lb/>been paid and laid out then. This I <sic>admitt</sic>:<lb/><add>and</add></p> <!-- indistinct pencil text in the margin is not transcribed --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1
Panopticon Bill Reasons
II. Objections to a valuation new in toto, in
contradistinction to the assessment of a supplemental
price. — or
II. Reasons for proposing the assessment of a
supplemental price, in preference to a valuation
new in toto.
What every body knows is that for the purpose
of the formerly included Penitentiary Establishment
the value of the land has been already That ver found. The
verdict by which it was found must, till some objection be made to it be
taken for a true one. I mean, always a true one a
for the time. at which it was given.
Taking that verdict then for a true one at the
time, if If then on the part of the Proprietors a fresh verdict be demanded, it can
only be on one or other of two grounds the ground
of one or other of two allegations suppositions
1. That though a true verdict for that time, it
would not be a true verdict for this: for that the
£6600, if p la paid and laid out now, would
not go so far as it would have done had it
been paid and laid out then. This I admitt:
and
|
Identifier: | JB/124/030/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-5 |
|||
|
124 |
panopticon |
||
|
030 |
panopticon bill valuation |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
41719 |
|||
