★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header in pencil --> | |||
<p><note>4</note> 4<lb/><note>Reasons</note> Panopticon Bill</p> <p>reality a dangerous one, would be so in appearance.<lb/><del>So</del> <add>Dangerous or not, it</add> would at any rate be a very <hi rend="underline">invidious</hi> one:<lb/>and such as on that account nothing <del>but</del> <add>short of</add> absolute<lb/>necessity would induce him to <del>assume</del> <add> charge himself</add><lb/>with.</p> <p>The more dangerous it appeared, the stronger<lb/>the checks which it would appear to require. The subsisting<lb/>choice was the <del>result of an initiative</del> <add>joint <del>produce</del> offspring of two concurring</add><lb/><del>power</del> <add>powers, an initiative</add> in the hands of three Supervisors, and a<lb/><del><gap/> power in the hands of</del> <add>Commission of approbation, <del>given to</del> vested in</add> the 12 Judges<lb/>added to the <add><sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic></add> Chancellor the Speaker and the<lb/>first Magistrate of the Metropolis. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] Such was the body of<lb/><sic>controul</sic> which was<lb/>deemed necessary to<lb/>confine within the limits<lb/>of justice and propriety<lb/>the original and still<lb/>subsisting choice: the<lb/>authors of that choice</note> <del>The Supervisors<lb/>were</del> all of them together devoid of personal<lb/>interest: all of them men of fortune: two in<lb/>particular men of very large fortune: <del>all</del> <add>two</add> of them<lb/>men of rank. A <del>system of checks</del> <add>check <del><sic>controul</sic></del></add> less powerful<lb/><del>than that which was applied to the <add>original &</add> subsisting</del><lb/><del>choice could not</del> <add>could <hi rend="underline">not</hi> surely with <del>neith</del> any tolerable consistency</add> be applied to the supposed<lb/><del>new one</del> <hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> new choice, by which<lb/>that original one, without<lb/>any assignable reason<lb/>that I know of, would<lb/>be to be superseded.</note> It would be setting an inferior<lb/>authority to <del>connect the sale</del> <add>reverse the judgment</add> of a superior one.<lb/>It would be manifesting more confidence in an interested<lb/><del>Contractor</del> <add>Projector,</add> than in those uninterested and dignified<lb/>Trustees.</p> <p><add>A</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
4 4
Reasons Panopticon Bill
reality a dangerous one, would be so in appearance.
So Dangerous or not, it would at any rate be a very invidious one:
and such as on that account nothing but short of absolute
necessity would induce him to assume charge himself
with.
The more dangerous it appeared, the stronger
the checks which it would appear to require. The subsisting
choice was the result of an initiative joint produce offspring of two concurring
power powers, an initiative in the hands of three Supervisors, and a
power in the hands of Commission of approbation, given to vested in the 12 Judges
added to the Ld Chancellor the Speaker and the
first Magistrate of the Metropolis. [+] [+] Such was the body of
controul which was
deemed necessary to
confine within the limits
of justice and propriety
the original and still
subsisting choice: the
authors of that choice The Supervisors
were all of them together devoid of personal
interest: all of them men of fortune: two in
particular men of very large fortune: all two of them
men of rank. A system of checks check controul less powerful
than that which was applied to the original & subsisting
choice could not could not surely with neith any tolerable consistency be applied to the supposed
new one [+]2 [+]2 new choice, by which
that original one, without
any assignable reason
that I know of, would
be to be superseded. It would be setting an inferior
authority to connect the sale reverse the judgment of a superior one.
It would be manifesting more confidence in an interested
Contractor Projector, than in those uninterested and dignified
Trustees.
A
|
Identifier: | JB/124/033/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
124 |
panopticon |
||
|
033 |
panopticon bill |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 / d3 / d4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
41722 |
|||
