JB/124/034/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/124/034/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->
<p>5 <note>5</note><lb/>Panopticon Bill Choice <note>Reasons</note></p> <p>A new choice could <del>therefore</del> not therefore<lb/><del>be made</del> with any propriety <add>be made</add> without <del><gap/><lb/>giving a deal of trouble to</del> <add><sic>encreasing</sic> a load</del> imposing a second load upon</add> some of the first persons<lb/>of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be<lb/>spared.  It cost three years to get from them<lb/>a first choice: <del>what would it</del> how much <add>more</add> time would<lb/>it cost to get a second?  What spot <del>were it</del> <add>too would it be</add><lb/><del>expected they should choose?</del> <add>expected of them to choose?</add> The same spot?<lb/>It would be <foreign><hi rend="underline">actum agere</hi></foreign>: a solemn and expensive<lb/>farce.  A different spot? &#x2014; but why a different<lb/>one?  They must condemn their predecessors: they<lb/>must condemn themselves: for <add>in respect of</add> a considerable <del>part</del><lb/> <add>if not a greater part</add> of the number, <del>if not the majority</del> the body is<lb/><add>still</add> composed of the same members.  They must pass<lb/>condemnation <add>then</add> on the former choice:<!-- all brackets in pencil  -->  [<del>and be what to<lb/>what purpose? and</del>] <add>but</add> on what grounds?  and to<lb/>what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]</p> <p>Will it be said that the <del>neg</del> neighbourhood was<lb/><del>not</del. <Add><del>the</del> not on that occasion<a/dd> sufficiently considered?  the pleasurableness<lb/>of the <del>neighbourhood</del> <add>situation</add>, and the tasks and feelings<lb/>of its inhabitants? &#x2014; That can not be.  A prior<lb/>choice had <Add>actually</add. been made: that prior choice rejected<lb/>by this very tribunal, <del><gap/></del> <add>and</add> on this very ground of objection;<lb/><Add>and<?add></p>  
<p>5 <note>5</note><lb/>Panopticon Bill Choice <note>Reasons</note></p> <p>A new choice could <del>therefore</del> not therefore<lb/><del>be made</del> with any propriety <add>be made</add> without <del><gap/><lb/>giving a deal of trouble to</del> <add><del><unclear>exercising</unclear> a load</del> imposing a second load upon</add> some of the first persons<lb/>of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be<lb/>spared.  It cost three years to get from them<lb/>a first choice: <del>what would it</del> how much <add>more</add> time would<lb/>it cost to get a second?  What spot <del>can it be</del> <add>too would it be</add><lb/><del>expected they should choose?</del> <add>expected of them to choose?</add> &#x2014; The same spot? &#x2014;<lb/>It would be <foreign><hi rend="underline">actum agere</hi></foreign>: a solemn and expensive<lb/>farce.  A different spot? &#x2014; but why a different<lb/>one?  They must condemn their predecessors: they<lb/>must condemn themselves: for <add>in respect of</add> a considerable <del>part</del><lb/> <add>if not the greater part</add> of the number, <del>if not the majority</del> the body is<lb/><add>still</add> composed of the same members.  They must pass<lb/>condemnation <add>then</add> on the former choice:<!-- all brackets in pencil  -->  [<del>and be what to<lb/>what purpose? and</del>] <add>but</add> on what grounds?  and to<lb/>what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]</p> <p>Will it be said that the <del>neg</del> neighbourhood was<lb/><del>not</del> <add><del>the</del> not on that occasion</add> sufficiently considered?  the pleasurableness<lb/>of the <del>neighbourhood</del> <add>situation</add>, and the tasks and feelings<lb/>of its inhabitants? &#x2014; That can not be.  A prior<lb/>choice had <add>actually</add> been made: that prior choice rejected<lb/>by this very tribunal, <del><unclear>a 2d</unclear></del> <add>and</add> on this very ground of objection;<lb/><add>and</add></p>  


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:58, 4 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

5 5
Panopticon Bill Choice Reasons

A new choice could therefore not therefore
be made with any propriety be made without
giving a deal of trouble to
exercising a load imposing a second load upon some of the first persons
of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be
spared. It cost three years to get from them
a first choice: what would it how much more time would
it cost to get a second? What spot can it be too would it be
expected they should choose? expected of them to choose? — The same spot? —
It would be actum agere: a solemn and expensive
farce. A different spot? — but why a different
one? They must condemn their predecessors: they
must condemn themselves: for in respect of a considerable part
if not the greater part of the number, if not the majority the body is
still composed of the same members. They must pass
condemnation then on the former choice: [and be what to
what purpose? and
] but on what grounds? and to
what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]

Will it be said that the neg neighbourhood was
not the not on that occasion sufficiently considered? the pleasurableness
of the neighbourhood situation, and the tasks and feelings
of its inhabitants? — That can not be. A prior
choice had actually been made: that prior choice rejected
by this very tribunal, a 2d and on this very ground of objection;
and



Identifier: | JB/124/034/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

124

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill choice

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / d6 / d7 / d8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41723

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in