★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header in pencil, 8 in ink --> | |||
<p>8<lb/><note>Reasons</note> Panopticon Bill Choice</p> <p>Upon what plan too could a new choice be<lb/>instituted? To whom <sic>committ</sic> the <hi rend="underline">initiative</hi>? To<lb/>the Proposer <del>?</del> alone? — that <del>would</del> lies open to<lb/>the objections already stated. To the Supervisors<lb/>appointed under the original plan? That would<lb/>be still recurring to the old farce <add>of <foreign>actum agere</foreign></add>. Is it for them<lb/>to be called upon to condemn their former choice<lb/>and make a new one? to condemn too the <add>12</add> Judges<lb/>and their high Colleagues who confirmed it?<lb/>Once again to what purpose and on what grounds?</p> <p>Other Trustees then <del>must be looked out</del> <add>would be to be sought after</add> for<lb/>the purpose. <del>Wh</del> <add>But who</add> then shall they be? In the<lb/>first place, by whom named? By Administration? —<lb/>be it so. But at whose suggestion? At<lb/>the Proposers? — This again would be another<lb/>farce. Without his privity <add>then</add> or approbation —<lb/>Observe the consequence. What shall be the<lb/>force and measure of their influence? Decision,<lb/>absolutely binding upon him, it can <del>not</del> <add>never</add> be. It<lb/>is out of his pocket that they money is to come<lb/>for the purchase of the land: it is out of his<lb/>pocket that the money is to come that is to be laid<lb/>out upon it. <add>From</add> Administration advances and assistance<lb/>are to come it is true; but this does not vary the<lb/><add>argument</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
8
Reasons Panopticon Bill Choice
Upon what plan too could a new choice be
instituted? To whom committ the initiative? To
the Proposer ? alone? — that would lies open to
the objections already stated. To the Supervisors
appointed under the original plan? That would
be still recurring to the old farce of actum agere. Is it for them
to be called upon to condemn their former choice
and make a new one? to condemn too the 12 Judges
and their high Colleagues who confirmed it?
Once again to what purpose and on what grounds?
Other Trustees then must be looked out would be to be sought after for
the purpose. Wh But who then shall they be? In the
first place, by whom named? By Administration? —
be it so. But at whose suggestion? At
the Proposers? — This again would be another
farce. Without his privity then or approbation —
Observe the consequence. What shall be the
force and measure of their influence? Decision,
absolutely binding upon him, it can not never be. It
is out of his pocket that they money is to come
for the purchase of the land: it is out of his
pocket that the money is to come that is to be laid
out upon it. From Administration advances and assistance
are to come it is true; but this does not vary the
argument
|
Identifier: | JB/124/034/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
124 |
panopticon |
||
|
034 |
panopticon bill choice |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d5 / d6 / d7 / d8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
41723 |
|||
