JB/124/036/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/124/036/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header in pencil -->
 
<p>11<lb/>Panopticon Bill Choice <note>Reasons</note></p> <p>Will the connection of his Penitentiary Plan<lb/>with the original one, will his right to graft the<lb/>one upon the other be disputed? &#x2014;  He hopes not:<lb/>surely not with justice.  The object as far as they<lb/>both go, will not be disputed to be the same.  Whatever<lb/><hi rend="underline">that</hi> <add>plan</add> does, <hi rend="underline">this</hi> does: <del>not to speak</del> to say nothing of<lb/>so much more <add>which it does, and</add> of which at that time there was no<lb/>conception. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> This is but a<lb/>project: &#x2014; certainly<lb/>any more than every<lb/>other measure <sic>till</sic> it<lb/>is tried.  This <del>is but</del><lb/>it is true, is but<lb/>a project: but what<lb/>was the other more?</note>  Had the <del>second <sic>comprized</sic> fallen</del> <add>new plan fallen at all</add> short<lb/>of the <del>new</del> <add>old</add> one, the identity <del>might</del> would have been<lb/>in so far questionable.  But will it be treated as<lb/><del>if it done</del> <add>doing</add> less or nothing, <del>for doing</del> <add>when it does</add> the whole<lb/>and so much more?  Will he be denied the use<lb/>of the old foundations, only for having given such<lb/>enlargement to the superstructure? &#x2014; Will <del>the</del> <add>a</add> track<lb/><del>that has been opened be departed from</del> <add> so much trodden in be departed from, and that</add> only to encounter<lb/>difficulties?</p>
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:40, 7 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

11
Panopticon Bill Choice Reasons

Will the connection of his Penitentiary Plan
with the original one, will his right to graft the
one upon the other be disputed? — He hopes not:
surely not with justice. The object as far as they
both go, will not be disputed to be the same. Whatever
that plan does, this does: not to speak to say nothing of
so much more which it does, and of which at that time there was no
conception. [+] [+] This is but a
project: — certainly
any more than every
other measure till it
is tried. This is but
it is true, is but
a project: but what
was the other more?
Had the second comprized fallen new plan fallen at all short
of the new old one, the identity might would have been
in so far questionable. But will it be treated as
if it done doing less or nothing, for doing when it does the whole
and so much more? Will he be denied the use
of the old foundations, only for having given such
enlargement to the superstructure? — Will the a track
that has been opened be departed from so much trodden in be departed from, and that only to encounter
difficulties?



Identifier: | JB/124/036/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

124

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill choice

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11 / d12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41725

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in