JB/117/424/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/117/424/001: Difference between revisions

RyanGilkes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<p>But, any such number as 2000 would it not<lb/>
<p>But, any such number as 2000 would it not<lb/>
(I hear it asked) <sic>bean</sic> <hi rend="underline">unwieldy</hi> number<add>?&#x2014;too</add><lb/>
(I hear it asked) be an <hi rend="underline">unwieldy</hi> number<add>?&#x2014;too</add><lb/>
unwieldy for good management?&#x2014;Oh, yes:&#x2014; on<lb/>
unwieldy for good management?&#x2014;Oh, yes:&#x2014; on<lb/>
every <hi rend="underline">ordinary</hi> plan, &#x2014;on any but the <hi rend="underline">central</hi><lb/>
every <hi rend="underline">ordinary</hi> plan, &#x2014;on any but the <hi rend="underline">central</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">inspection</hi> plan,&#x2014;too unwieldy by a great deal.<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">inspection</hi> plan,&#x2014;too unwieldy by a great deal.<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Nine hundred</hi> was the number of the <hi rend="underline">priso&#x2014;</hi>
<hi rend="underline">Nine hundred</hi> was the number of the <hi rend="underline">priso&#x2014;</hi> <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">&#x2014;ers</hi> that, on the original and supposed highly<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">&#x2014;ers</hi> that, on the original and supposed highly<lb/>
finished Penitentiary Plan, as per 19.G.3.C.74<lb/>
finished Penitentiary Plan, as per 19.G.3.C.74<lb/>
were to have been confined in the <hi rend="underline">town</hi> that<lb/>
were to have been confined in the <hi rend="underline">town</hi> that<lb/>
was to have been built for that purpose at<lb/>
was to have been built for that purpose at<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Battersea rise:</hi> <add>and, as to <hi rend="underline"><unclear>House</unclear>,</hi></add>
<hi rend="underline">Battersea rise:</hi> <add>and, as to <hi rend="underline">Houses,</hi></add>
nine hundred &#x2014; being the num&#x2014;<lb/>
nine hundred &#x2014; being the num&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;ber of separate Houses, which, over and above<lb/>
&#x2014;ber of separate Houses, which, over and above<lb/>
Line 33: Line 33:
but one: and that one House is capable of being pervaded in all directions&#x2014;pervaded by<lb/>
but one: and that one House is capable of being pervaded in all directions&#x2014;pervaded by<lb/>
a single glance, and without so much as a change<lb/>
a single glance, and without so much as a change<lb/>
of <unclear>pauper</unclear>. <del>change</del>
of posture. <del>change</del></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:04, 24 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

But, any such number as 2000 would it not
(I hear it asked) be an unwieldy number?—too
unwieldy for good management?—Oh, yes:— on
every ordinary plan, —on any but the central
inspection plan,—too unwieldy by a great deal.
Nine hundred was the number of the priso—
—ers that, on the original and supposed highly
finished Penitentiary Plan, as per 19.G.3.C.74
were to have been confined in the town that
was to have been built for that purpose at
Battersea rise: and, as to Houses, nine hundred — being the num—
—ber of separate Houses, which, over and above
such as were to be occupied in common, were
to have been included in that town—was as—
—suredly too great a number for good manage—
—ment: 2000 two thousand consequently in a much greater
degree too great.

On every as yet exemplified plan of construc—
—tion and management, the natural & naturally
prevalent apprehension of unwieldiness has
therefore very just ground to stand upon.

But upon the Panopticon Principle,—whether
it be for Paupers or for Convicts — for free and
innocent men or for prisoners — though the
number of the inhabitants be 2000, the House is
but one: and that one House is capable of being pervaded in all directions—pervaded by
a single glance, and without so much as a change
of posture. change




Identifier: | JB/117/424/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

424

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d46 / f45

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 2118, vol. 8

ID Number

39041

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in