JB/117/431/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/117/431/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>32</note> <note>35</note>


<note>33</note>
<p>Being <del><gap/></del> as to a more or less considerable<lb/>
portion of it unavoidable, we have here an <sic>expence</sic><lb/>
which as to so much can not be saved. But that<lb/>
which <del>can</del> <add>may</add> be done, and in point of justice (it should<lb/>
seem) ought to be done, is to equalize it: to <del>the each that,</del> <add>equalize it, I</add><lb/>
<add>mean, in such sort that</add> upon a County, the Assize or Quarter Session Town of<lb/>
which is more distant than that of another County<lb/>
from the place of permanent confinement, man for<lb/>
man, the burthen of conveyance may not, on that<lb/>
account, be rendered, or left to be, the heavier <add>in its pressure on the first mentioned County</add> <del>viz</del><lb/>
viz. in the proportion of the distance.<lb/></p>


<p><del>Whosoever on</del> <add>Now as to the mode of equalization. On</add> the contract plan, <add>whosoever</add> carries on<lb/>
the management of that Panopticon receptacle<lb/>
which is the common reservoir for the convicts<lb/>
of all the several Counties in <del>I</del> question, in his<lb/>
contract it might be made a condition, that for a<lb/>
sum certain, he should take upon him conveyance<lb/>
of the the Convicts from all the several Assize<lb/>
Towns and Quarter Session towns in the district:&#x2014;<lb/>
for which purpose an average would of course be taken,<lb/>
viz by taking the sum of the distance, and dividing<lb/>
it by the number of the Towns:&#x2014;change of<lb/>
conveyance, so much per mile.<lb/></p>
<note>34</note>
<p>V. Objection the 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>. <hi rend="underline">Supposed unsuitableness of the fund,<lb/>
upon which, on this plan, the <sic>expence</sic> of conveyance, would<lb/>
be charged.</hi><lb/></p>
<p>To this objection two answers present themselves&#x2014;<lb/></p>
<p>1. that, for the <sic>expence</sic> in question the fund in question<lb/>
is not an unsuitable one: but on the contrary<lb/>
a more suitable one than the fund upon which it would in<lb/>
the other case be charged.<lb/></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:00, 28 May 2021

Click Here To Edit

32 35

33

Being as to a more or less considerable
portion of it unavoidable, we have here an expence
which as to so much can not be saved. But that
which can may be done, and in point of justice (it should
seem) ought to be done, is to equalize it: to the each that, equalize it, I
mean, in such sort that upon a County, the Assize or Quarter Session Town of
which is more distant than that of another County
from the place of permanent confinement, man for
man, the burthen of conveyance may not, on that
account, be rendered, or left to be, the heavier in its pressure on the first mentioned County viz
viz. in the proportion of the distance.

Whosoever on Now as to the mode of equalization. On the contract plan, whosoever carries on
the management of that Panopticon receptacle
which is the common reservoir for the convicts
of all the several Counties in I question, in his
contract it might be made a condition, that for a
sum certain, he should take upon him conveyance
of the the Convicts from all the several Assize
Towns and Quarter Session towns in the district:—
for which purpose an average would of course be taken,
viz by taking the sum of the distance, and dividing
it by the number of the Towns:—change of
conveyance, so much per mile.

34

V. Objection the 5th. Supposed unsuitableness of the fund,
upon which, on this plan, the expence of conveyance, would
be charged.

To this objection two answers present themselves—

1. that, for the expence in question the fund in question
is not an unsuitable one: but on the contrary
a more suitable one than the fund upon which it would in
the other case be charged.



Identifier: | JB/117/431/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

33-34

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

431

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d32 / f35

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

letter 2118, vol. 8

ID Number

39048

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in