JB/052/076/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/076/001: Difference between revisions

WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head><unclear>JB.</unclear> 1825. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 31.<lb/>
<head>GB. 1825. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 31.<lb/>
Procedure Code.<lb/>
Procedure Code.<lb/>
<gap/> 11<lb/>
<gap/> 11<lb/>
Line 20: Line 20:
3. Expense too great.</p>
3. Expense too great.</p>
<p>3.<lb/>
<p>3.<lb/>
After Epistolary made,<lb/>
After Epistolary more,<lb/>
<unclear>made oral</unclear> employable.</p>
mode oral employable.</p>
<p>4.<lb/>
<p>4.<lb/>
Proposed Defendant's<lb/>
Proposed Defendant's<lb/>
Line 31: Line 31:
contents.</p>
contents.</p>
<p>7.<lb/>
<p>7.<lb/>
<unclear>Responsion</unclear> paper</p>
Responsion paper</p>
<p>8.<lb/>
<p>8.<lb/>
Examinee responsible<lb/>
Examinee responsible<lb/>
Line 73: Line 73:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:41, 11 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

GB. 1825. Jany 31.
Procedure Code.
11
Ch. IXV Intermediate Proceedings
§. 7. Epistolary correspondence.

1.
Epistolary correspondence
adopted at the
instance of applicant.

2.
Grounds for the adoption
1. Facts simple
2. For answer, no extraordinary
aptitude
required
3. Expense too great.

3.
After Epistolary more,
mode oral employable.

4.
Proposed Defendant's
Examination Paper.

5.
Code of the Occasion

6.
Examination Paper
contents.

7.
Responsion paper

8.
Examinee responsible
for answer.

9.
With examination
paper, an exemplar
of minute of proceedings.

10.
So Warning against
mendacity.

11.
So, notice of eventual
oral examination.

12.
Cases for Epistolary
made
1. Distance of Defendant's
Judicatory.
2. Defendant abroad.

13.
If Defendant's evidence
sufficient, he may
demand a decree.

14.
Cause of insufficiency,
adverseness maximized.

15.
But, in this case,
trustworthiness maximized.

16.
Even understanding
system, trustworthiness
of adverse testimony
recognized.

17.
If Defendant's answer
insufficient, ulterior
interrogations
when employable



Identifier: | JB/052/076/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-17

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

076

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

16749

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in