JB/078/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/013/001: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
10,213 edits
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
awardsmanage, Bureaucrats, giftadmin, staff, Administrators
44,619 edits
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1826. Octr 28.  
<p>1826. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 28.</p>
Review of Humphreys H's Preliminary Enactment 21. "The principal article"? Undistinguishable which: for want of a name. 22 Cause of the obscurity &#x2014; 1. Squeezing into one article, distinct enactments. 2. Not distinguishing them by numbers See Agenda. 23. Cause of the imperfection what? Ambition to display the fewness of his articles? 102. Laudable this, but he was not aware of that, to each object there sh.d be a name by which it may be distinguished. 24. Non numeration apt in novels <gap/>: unapt in enactments. 25: "Construction of Laws Statutes should provide for their own interpretation. Common Laws useless his Code kills them.  
<p>Review of Humphreys</p>
<p>H's Preliminary Enactment</p>
<p>21.</p>
<p>"The principal article"?</p>
<p>Undistinguishable <lb/>
which: for want <lb/>
of a name.</p>
<p>22</p>
<p>Cause of the obscurity <lb/>
&#x2014;</p>
<p>1. Squeezing into one <lb/>
article, distinct enactments.</p>
<p>2. Not distinguishing <lb/>
them by numbers. <lb/>
See <hi rend="underline">Agenda</hi>.</p>
<p>23.</p>
<p>Cause of the imperfection <lb/>
what? Ambition <lb/>
to display the <lb/>
fewness of his articles? <lb/>
102.</p>
<p>Laudable this, but <lb/>
he was not aware <lb/>
that, to each object <lb/>
there sh.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> be a name <lb/>
by which it may be <lb/>
distinguished.</p>
<p>24.</p>
<p>Non numeration <lb/>
apt in novels &amp;c <lb/>
unapt in enactments.</p>
<p>25:</p>
<p>"Construction of Laws <lb/>
Statutes should provide <lb/>
for their own <lb/>
interpretation.</p>
<p>Common Laws useless: <lb/>
his Code kills them.</p> <pb/>




H's Preliminary Enactments
<p>H's Preliminary Enactments</p>
26.
<p>26.</p>
A Code sh.d render it needless to travel out of itself for the meaning of law terms See Agenda.  These it should expound.
<p>A Code sh.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> render it <lb/>
Of universal jurisprudence terms J
needless to travel out <lb/>
B. has an assortment at his service. 27.  Instance Servitude borrowed by H. from Roman bred law: unexpounded.  28.  In course of his Code. J.B. expounds all leading terms belonging to it. 29. Unless H. kills Judge-made law, it will construe as at has done Statute of Frauds: which was made to be so construed. 30 He must not <gap/>ane Judge made law as Peel has done-whether on his own or an lawyer's judgement. 31. Art. Unintelligible-He confounds Act and Code produced by it.  He sh.d have left it to Code to report laws contrary to it: which it would have done of course without mentioning them.
of itself for the meaning <lb/>
of law terms <lb/>
See Agenda.</p>  
<p>These it should expound.</p>
<p>Of universal jurisprudence <lb/>
terms J<lb/>
B. has an assortment <lb/>
at his service.</p>
<p>27.</p>  
<p>Instance <hi rend="underline">Servitude</hi><lb/>
borrowed by H. from <lb/>
Roman bred law: unexpounded.</p>  
<p>28.</p>  
<p>In course of his Code. <lb/>
J.B. expounds all <lb/>
leading terms belonging <lb/>
to it.</p>
<p>29.</p>
<p>Unless H. kills Judge-<lb/>
made law, it will <lb/>
construe <lb/>
as it has done Statute <lb/>
of Frauds: which was <lb/>
made to be so construed.</p>
<p>30.</p>
<p>He must not <gap/> <lb/>
Judge made law as <lb/>
Peel has done &#x2014; whether <lb/>
on his own or <lb/>
an <lb/>
lawyer's judgement.</p>
<p>31.</p>
<p>Art 6. Unintelligible<lb/>
He confounds Act and <lb/>
Code produced by it.  <lb/>
He sh.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> have left it to <lb/>
Code to report laws <lb/>
contrary to it: which <lb/>
it would have done <lb/>
of course without <lb/>
mentioning them.</p><pb/>


Hs Preliminary Enactments 32. Doubts so many raised in a mind that has nothing to get by them, how many in those that have so much? 33. Art 1. "Henceforth"- Day meant literally Enactment day of his Codification ordaining Act. Scarcely coild he man any other day than do. of the Code enacted in consequence of it. 34. Agenda, to prevent disappointment. 1. Declaration that in the Code, when made, care shall be taken to prevent disappointment, producing retroaction in the text of it. 2. Search the books for dubious points and give statutory preinterpretation of them See Agenda. 35. J.B.'s exposition of Disappointment- preventing principle four pages. <gap/>3 Refer to Agenda. 36. Reference to 37. Utterly void. Mischievousness of the J.B's substitute to it pages three <gap/>3 Refer to Agenda.
<p>Hs Preliminary Enactments</p>
<p>32.</p>
<p>Doubts so many <lb/>
raised in a mind <lb/>
that has nothing <lb/>
to get by them, how <lb/>
many in those that <lb/>
have so much?</p>
<p>33.</p>
<p>Art 1. "Henceforth"- <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Day</hi> meant literally <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Enactment</hi> day of his <lb/>
Codification ordaining <lb/>
Act. Scarcely could <lb/>
he means any other <lb/>
day than d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. of the Code <lb/>
enacted in consequence <lb/>
of it.</p>
<p>34.</p>
<p>Agenda, to prevent <lb/>
disappointment.</p>
<p>1. Declaration that <lb/>
in the Code, when <lb/>
made, care shall be <lb/>
taken to prevent disappointment, <lb/>
producing <lb/>
retroaction <lb/>
in the text of it.</p>
<p>2. Search the Books <lb/>
for dubious points, <lb/>
and give statutory <lb/>
preinterpretation <lb/>
of them <hi rend="underline">See Agenda</hi>.</p>
<p>35.</p>
<p>J.B.'s exposition of <lb/>
Disappointment- <lb/>
preventing principle <lb/>
four pages.</p>  
<p>&#9758; Refer to Agenda.</p>
<p>36.</p>
<p>Reference to</p>
<p>37.</p>
<p>Utterly void.<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> Mischievousness <lb/>
of the</p>
<p>J.B's substitute to it <lb/>
pages three</p>
<p>&#9758; Refer to Agenda.</p><pb/>




Line 18: Line 141:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:17, 21 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr 28.

Review of Humphreys

H's Preliminary Enactment

21.

"The principal article"?

Undistinguishable
which: for want
of a name.

22

Cause of the obscurity
—

1. Squeezing into one
article, distinct enactments.

2. Not distinguishing
them by numbers.
See Agenda.

23.

Cause of the imperfection
what? Ambition
to display the
fewness of his articles?
102.

Laudable this, but
he was not aware
that, to each object
there sh.d be a name
by which it may be
distinguished.

24.

Non numeration
apt in novels &c
unapt in enactments.

25:

"Construction of Laws
Statutes should provide
for their own
interpretation.

Common Laws useless:
his Code kills them.


---page break---


H's Preliminary Enactments

26.

A Code sh.d render it
needless to travel out
of itself for the meaning
of law terms
See Agenda.

These it should expound.

Of universal jurisprudence
terms J
B. has an assortment
at his service.

27.

Instance Servitude
borrowed by H. from
Roman bred law: unexpounded.

28.

In course of his Code.
J.B. expounds all
leading terms belonging
to it.

29.

Unless H. kills Judge-
made law, it will
construe
as it has done Statute
of Frauds: which was
made to be so construed.

30.

He must not
Judge made law as
Peel has done — whether
on his own or
an
lawyer's judgement.

31.

Art 6. Unintelligible
He confounds Act and
Code produced by it.
He sh.d have left it to
Code to report laws
contrary to it: which
it would have done
of course without
mentioning them.


---page break---

Hs Preliminary Enactments

32.

Doubts so many
raised in a mind
that has nothing
to get by them, how
many in those that
have so much?

33.

Art 1. "Henceforth"-
Day meant literally
Enactment day of his
Codification ordaining
Act. Scarcely could
he means any other
day than do. of the Code
enacted in consequence
of it.

34.

Agenda, to prevent
disappointment.

1. Declaration that
in the Code, when
made, care shall be
taken to prevent disappointment,
producing
retroaction
in the text of it.

2. Search the Books
for dubious points,
and give statutory
preinterpretation
of them See Agenda.

35.

J.B.'s exposition of
Disappointment-
preventing principle
four pages.

☞ Refer to Agenda.

36.

Reference to

37.

Utterly void.n Mischievousness
of the

J.B's substitute to it
pages three

☞ Refer to Agenda.


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/078/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-10-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

21-37

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

H's Preliminary Enactment

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

25104

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/078/013/001&oldid=306990"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in