JB/010/041/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:03, 2 July 2021

6.

the law not having passed till after ye vessel left the country. Yet it seems not
necessary in all cases, ignorance thus circumstanced
should be regarded as an excuse: as a ground of extenuation, or at
any rate of justification. Why? Because
it may be that though not as yet passed
he had sufficient reason for supposing
that it would be

Delito contre de l'adition la condition & Such is
the variety in the situations comprehended
under this Title and the mischiefs
to which human agency they are liable
to give place I can not hope to be able
to say anything to you on the subject
at this distance with any promise of
being of use. In regard to this or that
particular point if there were any
time for it and I could find a little
time too allot to it as at present, my
endeavours should not be wanting

Identifier: \| JB/010/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	010	Main Headings
Folio number	041	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	correspondence	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f21 / f22 / f23 / f24
Penner	john herbert koe	Watermarks	<…>co
Marginals		Paper Producer	a. levy
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	draft of letter 2425, vol. 9	ID Number	3477
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/010/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>6</head><!-- Page 21 pencil note --><lb/><p>the law not having passed till after y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi> <!-- abbreviation for 'the' --><lb/>vessel left the country. Yet it seems not<lb/>necessary in all cases, ignorance thus circumstanced<lb/>should be regarded as an excuse: as a ground of extenuation, or at<lb/>any rate of justification. Why? Because<lb/>it may be that though not as yet passed<lb/>he had sufficient reason for supposing<lb/>that it would be</p><lb/><p><foreign>Delito contre <del>de l'adition</del> la condition &amp;</foreign> <!-- Spanish, delito contra la condition, offence against the state --> Such is<lb/>the variety in the situations comprehended<lb/>under this Title and the mischiefs<lb/>to which human agency they are liable<lb/>to give place I can not hope to be able<lb/>to say anything to you on the subject<lb/>at this distance with any promise of<lb/>being of use. In regard to this or that<lb/>particular point if there were any<lb/>time for it and I could find a little<lb/>time <sic>too</sic> allot to it as at present, my<lb/>endeavours should not be wanting</p><pb/>
+<p>6.</p>
+<p>the law not having passed till after y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi> vessel left the country.  Yet it seems not<lb/>
+necessary in all cases, ignorance thus circumstanced<lb/>
+should be regarded as an excuse: as a ground of extenuation, or at<lb/>
+any rate of justification.  Why?  Because<lb/>
+it may be that though not as yet passed<lb/>
+he had sufficient reason for supposing<lb/>
+that it would be</p>
+<p><foreign>Delito contre <del>de l'adition</del> la condition &amp;</foreign>  Such is<lb/>
+the variety in the situations comprehended<lb/>
+under this Title and the mischiefs<lb/>
+to which human agency they are liable<lb/>
+to give place I can not hope to be able<lb/>
+to say anything to you on the subject<lb/>
+at this distance with any promise of<lb/>
+being of use. In regard to this or that<lb/>
+particular point if there were any<lb/>
+time for it and I could find a little<lb/>time <sic>too</sic> allot to it as at present, my<lb/>
+endeavours should not be wanting</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/010/041/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:03, 2 July 2021

Navigation

Search