JB/008/074/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/008/074/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1821. March 6.<lb/>
<p>1821. March 6.</p>
<head>Rid yourselves of Ultramaria</head>
<head>Rid yourselves of Ultramaria</head>
[pencil mark reverse column headings]<lb/>
[pencil mark indicating an edit to reverse column headings]<lb/>
<p>&sect;.7. J. B.s opinion with Reasons,<lb/>
<p>&sect;.7. J. B.s opinion with Reasons,<lb/>
applied to France, and<lb/>
applied to France, and<lb/>
Line 11: Line 11:
general. A.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1792.</p>
general. A.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1792.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1.<lb/>
1. This introduction concludes<lb/>
with more particular<lb/>
reference to my opinion,<lb/>
applied directly to<lb/>
France only A.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1792.<lb/>
Title, J. B. to National<lb/>
Convention of France<lb/>
p.p. 48. 8 v.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> Better title the<lb/>
first words of it &#x2014; Emancipate<lb/>
your Colonies.<lb/>
Printed Jan. <add>7</add> 1793: never<lb/>
sold: Copies in various<lb/>
hands: one sent to Cortes:<lb/>
others at Madrid in private<lb/>
hand.<lb/></p>
 
<p>2.<lb/>
Even then, I was not unknown<lb/>
in France.<lb/>
But this would be a<lb/>
digression.</p>
 
<p>3.<lb/>
2. In Peines and Recompences,<lb/>
edited by Dumont<lb/>
1802, in Vol. II. is a chapter<lb/>
on <hi rend="underline">Colonies</hi>. Matter<lb/>
for the pamphlet of 1793.<lb/>
Reasoning applying alike<lb/>
to all distant dependencies.<lb/>
England's not excepted.<lb/></p>
 
<p>4.<lb/>
In works of others, opinions<lb/>
to this effect can<lb/>
not but have had place:<lb/>
in none, has the general<lb/>
question been argued in<lb/>
form: as in mine.<lb/></p>
 
<p>5.<lb/>
To return to Spain.<lb/>
Produce loss then, what<lb/>
now? The enquiry is in<lb/>
your hands.<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
&sect;.6. Tables. Grounds of<lb/>
the opinions.<lb/>
 
Table 1 <hi rend="superscript">(a.)</hi><lb/>
<p>1. Townsends explanation<lb/>
of these vast differences &#x2014;<lb/>
amounts large, revenue<lb/>
gross: amounts small,<lb/>
revenue net. Net, what<lb/>
came into Spanish treasury:<lb/>
the rest expended<lb/>
where collected.<lb/></p>
 
<p>2.<lb/>
This while insisting<lb/>
that Colonies yield no Revenue<lb/>
to Spain, yet stating<lb/>
as yielding 39,899,918<lb/>
on average of 10 years<lb/>
ending 1778; and 60,000,000<lb/>
on average of 5 years,<lb/>
ending 1785.<lb/></p>
 
<p>Hence his general assertion<lb/>
included Spanish<lb/>
expenditure on this account<lb/>
in Spain: deduct<lb/>
net amount received<lb/>
in Spain from Spanish<lb/>
America, balance, 0.</p>
 
<p>Table III (a)<lb/>
Inferences. In Class 1, titles<lb/>
from objects of comparison<lb/>
for present expenditure.<lb/>
Can any be<lb/>
struck off? do any require<lb/>
to be added?.</p>
 
<p>2. So as to <hi rend="underline">sums.</hi></p>
 
<p>3. Giving reasons.</p>
 
<p>4. So as to Classes 2. 3 & 4.</p>
 
<p>5. Shown by Class 2. Monarchical<lb/>
as contrasted with<lb/>
Republican Expenditure.<lb/>
128,000,000 with 600,000.<lb/></p>
 
<p>6. Spaniards, what would<lb/>
they suffer were these articles<lb/>
struck off: Anglo<lb/>
American, what<lb/>
were they added?<lb/></p>
 
<p>7. So as to the other European<lb/>
Monarchies: particularly<lb/>
France & England.<lb/></p>
<pb/>
 
<p>Table III (a) contin.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></p>
 
<p>8. So as to <hi rend="underline">minor</hi> d.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> to<lb/>
swell this expenditure<lb/>
promoted into Kingdoms.<lb/></p>
 
<p>9. This could not be otherwise.<lb/>
In all Monarchies,<lb/>
principle acted on,<lb/>
end of Society, welfare<lb/>
of one: in Spain, principle<lb/>
lately professed (Art 13.)<lb/>
welfare of all:<lb/>
how far practice accords<lb/>
will soon be<lb/>
seen.<lb/></p>
<pb/>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 9 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

1821. March 6.

Rid yourselves of Ultramaria [pencil mark indicating an edit to reverse column headings]

§.7. J. B.s opinion with Reasons,
applied to France, and
distant dependencies in
general. A.o 1792.

1.
1. This introduction concludes
with more particular
reference to my opinion,
applied directly to
France only A.o 1792.
Title, J. B. to National
Convention of France
p.p. 48. 8 v.o Better title the
first words of it — Emancipate
your Colonies.
Printed Jan. 7 1793: never
sold: Copies in various
hands: one sent to Cortes:
others at Madrid in private
hand.

2.
Even then, I was not unknown
in France.
But this would be a
digression.

3.
2. In Peines and Recompences,
edited by Dumont
1802, in Vol. II. is a chapter
on Colonies. Matter
for the pamphlet of 1793.
Reasoning applying alike
to all distant dependencies.
England's not excepted.

4.
In works of others, opinions
to this effect can
not but have had place:
in none, has the general
question been argued in
form: as in mine.

5.
To return to Spain.
Produce loss then, what
now? The enquiry is in
your hands.


---page break---
§.6. Tables. Grounds of
the opinions.

Table 1 (a.)

1. Townsends explanation
of these vast differences —
amounts large, revenue
gross: amounts small,
revenue net. Net, what
came into Spanish treasury:
the rest expended
where collected.

2.
This while insisting
that Colonies yield no Revenue
to Spain, yet stating
as yielding 39,899,918
on average of 10 years
ending 1778; and 60,000,000
on average of 5 years,
ending 1785.

Hence his general assertion
included Spanish
expenditure on this account
in Spain: deduct
net amount received
in Spain from Spanish
America, balance, 0.

Table III (a)
Inferences. In Class 1, titles
from objects of comparison
for present expenditure.
Can any be
struck off? do any require
to be added?.

2. So as to sums.

3. Giving reasons.

4. So as to Classes 2. 3 & 4.

5. Shown by Class 2. Monarchical
as contrasted with
Republican Expenditure.
128,000,000 with 600,000.

6. Spaniards, what would
they suffer were these articles
struck off: Anglo
American, what
were they added?

7. So as to the other European
Monarchies: particularly
France & England.


---page break---

Table III (a) contin.o

8. So as to minor d.o to
swell this expenditure
promoted into Kingdoms.

9. This could not be otherwise.
In all Monarchies,
principle acted on,
end of Society, welfare
of one: in Spain, principle
lately professed (Art 13.)
welfare of all:
how far practice accords
will soon be
seen.


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/008/074/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8.

Date_1

1821-03-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-5

Box

008

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Image

001

Titles

table i (a) / table iii (a)

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3178

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in