JB/052/266/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/266/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1824 <sic>Nov.</sic> 26<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>14<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Judiciary Application</note><lb/>(3 >note>&sect;.5. Application commenced<b/>how</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Before calling for<lb/>Defendant's appearance<lb/>Judge will satisfy himself<lb/>as to concurrent circumstances<lb/>elicited</note></p> <p>if the <del>subject of</del> <add>application be a</add> complaint <del>be a wrong</del> the definition<lb?>of the wrong will have informed the Judge of the <gap/><lb/>circumstances the <add><gap/></add> concurrence of which is necessary to the<lb/>constituting it </add> existence of it</add>.  s need may occasion he will either mention<lb/>them to the applicant, or want <del>for</del> to <del>pu</del> collect them from the<lb/>applicant's statement as it comes out <add>forth</add>.  And before<lb/>he determines to <gap/> for the appearance of a defendant, he<lb/>will in a like manner satisfy himself that <add>according to the applicant's <sic>shewing</sic></add> no circumstances<lb/>of justification as of <gap/> relation to the species of offence<lb/>in question have had place.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>If application a demand<lb/>Judge to have recourse<lb/>to table <sic>shewing</sic> rights<lb/>to demand services</note></p> <p>If the application be <del>the</del> <add>as above a</add> demand, <del><gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>the Judge will of course have in his mind the respective<lb/>natures of the several services capable of being demanded<lb/>without imputation of wrong on the part of those at whose<lb/>charge they are demanded: together with a list of all<lb/>the several efficient causes of title with respect to service<lb/>in all these <del><gap/></del> several shapes.  This being consigned to another<lb/>such Table as above will at the same time afford to the<lb/>applicant such information as the state of his mind enables<lb/>him to contrive.</p> <p><note>8<lb/>In the same table<lb/>both collative &amp; ablative<lb/>circumstances exhibited</note></p> <p>In the same Table in which are exhibited the several<lb/><gap/> which with reference to <add>a table to</add> the sort of services in question<lb/>have a collective effect, will also <gap/> in <del><gap/><d/el> <add>conjunction</add> with<lb/>these the several circumstances which <del>are con</del> with reference<lb/>to that same object may be an ablative effect.</p> <p>the same case which has been employed in the <gap/.<lb/>so far as depends upon the applicant's <sic>shewing</sic> the existence<lb?>of some one article with <gap/> of <gap/> circumstances will be employed<lb/><add>in</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin --> in ascertaining the non-existence<lb/>of all the<lb/>several collective circumstances.</p>   
<head>1824 <sic>Nov.</sic> 26<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>14<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Judiciary Application</note><lb/>(3 <note>&sect;.5. Application commenced<lb/>how</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Before calling for<lb/>Defendant's appearance<lb/>Judge will satisfy himself<lb/>as to concurrent <sic>justificative</sic><lb/>or exempting circumstances<lb/>elicited</note></p> <p>If the <del>subject of</del> <add>application be a</add> complaint <del>be a wrong</del> the definition<lb/>of the wrong will have informed the Judge of the extenuative<lb/>circumstances the <add>union</add> concurrence of which is necessary to the<lb/>constituting it <add> existence of it</add>.  As need may <sic>occurr</sic> he will either mention<lb/>them to the applicant, or want <del>for</del> to <del>pu</del> collect them from the<lb/>applicant's statement as it comes out <add>forth</add>.  And before<lb/>he determines to call for the appearance of a defendant, he<lb/>will in a like manner satisfy himself that <add>according to the applicant's <sic>shewing</sic></add> no circumstances<lb/>of justification as of exemption relative to the species of offence<lb/>in question have had place.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>If application a demand<lb/>Judge to have recourse<lb/>to table <sic>shewing</sic> rights<lb/>to demand services</note></p> <p>If the application be <del>the</del> <add>as above a</add> demand, <del><gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>the Judge will of course have in his mind the respective<lb/>natures of the several services capable of being demanded<lb/>without imputation of wrong on the part of those at whose<lb/>charge they are demanded: together with a list of all<lb/>the several efficient causes of title with respect to service<lb/>in all these <del><gap/></del> several shapes.  This being consigned to another<lb/>such Table as above will at the same time afford to the<lb/>applicant such information as the state of his mind enables<lb/>him to contrive.</p> <p><note>8<lb/>In the same table<lb/>both collative &amp; ablative<lb/>circumstances exhibited</note></p> <p>In the same Table in which are exhibited the several<lb/>incidents which with reference to <add>a table of</add> the sort of services in question<lb/>have a collective effect, will also exhibit in <del><gap/></del> <add>conjunction</add> with<lb/>them the several circumstances which <del>are con</del> with reference<lb/>to that same object may have an ablative effect.</p> <p>The same case which has been employed in the accounting<lb/>so far as depends upon the applicant's <sic>shewing</sic> the existence<lb/>of some one article in the list of collective circumstances will be employed<lb/><add>in</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin --> in ascertaining the non-existence<lb/>of all the<lb/>several collective circumstances.</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:50, 21 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

1824 Nov. 26
Procedure Code

14
Ch. Judiciary Application
(3 §.5. Application commenced
how

6
Before calling for
Defendant's appearance
Judge will satisfy himself
as to concurrent justificative
or exempting circumstances
elicited

If the subject of application be a complaint be a wrong the definition
of the wrong will have informed the Judge of the extenuative
circumstances the union concurrence of which is necessary to the
constituting it existence of it. As need may occurr he will either mention
them to the applicant, or want for to pu collect them from the
applicant's statement as it comes out forth. And before
he determines to call for the appearance of a defendant, he
will in a like manner satisfy himself that according to the applicant's shewing no circumstances
of justification as of exemption relative to the species of offence
in question have had place.

7
If application a demand
Judge to have recourse
to table shewing rights
to demand services

If the application be the as above a demand,
the Judge will of course have in his mind the respective
natures of the several services capable of being demanded
without imputation of wrong on the part of those at whose
charge they are demanded: together with a list of all
the several efficient causes of title with respect to service
in all these several shapes. This being consigned to another
such Table as above will at the same time afford to the
applicant such information as the state of his mind enables
him to contrive.

8
In the same table
both collative & ablative
circumstances exhibited

In the same Table in which are exhibited the several
incidents which with reference to a table of the sort of services in question
have a collective effect, will also exhibit in conjunction with
them the several circumstances which are con with reference
to that same object may have an ablative effect.

The same case which has been employed in the accounting
so far as depends upon the applicant's shewing the existence
of some one article in the list of collective circumstances will be employed
in
in ascertaining the non-existence
of all the
several collective circumstances.




Identifier: | JB/052/266/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1824-11-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

266

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d14 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16939

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in