JB/067/252/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/067/252/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/067/252/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/067/252/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1826. May 24<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Penal Code.</head></p>
 
<p>I the difficulty here in question be regarded as the<lb/>
 
ground of peremptory abjection, it would make<lb/>
 
no small clearance, in every code, that has as yet<lb/>
seen the light.</p>
<p>Not to speak of punishment, the English code in<lb/>
particular terms with cases, in which under the<lb/>
name of compensation, the burden, 10, 20 or 100<lb/>
times as heavy as many are that has been<lb/>
imposed in the name of punishment has been<lb/>
imposed for transgressions, by which not a particle<lb/>
of vexation was it <gap/> probable enough produced:<lb/>
the judicial demand having been<lb/>
produced by no other motive than the satisfaction<lb/>
expected from the sight of an adversary<lb/>
sinking under the burden of the judicial expense<lb/>
<del>the place</del>.  For cases of this sort one place to look<lb/>
into is the title of action in the case for words.<lb/>
Previously <add>Before</add> to entrance on the field in which this difficulty<lb/> must be encountered, the best course to take<lb/>
will be, the looking out for cases, in which your circumstance<lb/>
or another this difficulty will be seen<lb/>
to stand excluded.</p>
<p>Case 1.  Where, for, or in the production of the<lb/>
vexation in question falsehood is the instrument<lb/>
or one of the instruments employed.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:48, 5 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. May 24
Penal Code.

I the difficulty here in question be regarded as the
ground of peremptory abjection, it would make
no small clearance, in every code, that has as yet
seen the light.

Not to speak of punishment, the English code in
particular terms with cases, in which under the
name of compensation, the burden, 10, 20 or 100
times as heavy as many are that has been
imposed in the name of punishment has been
imposed for transgressions, by which not a particle
of vexation was it probable enough produced:
the judicial demand having been
produced by no other motive than the satisfaction
expected from the sight of an adversary
sinking under the burden of the judicial expense
the place. For cases of this sort one place to look
into is the title of action in the case for words.
Previously Before to entrance on the field in which this difficulty
must be encountered, the best course to take
will be, the looking out for cases, in which your circumstance
or another this difficulty will be seen
to stand excluded.

Case 1. Where, for, or in the production of the
vexation in question falsehood is the instrument
or one of the instruments employed.


Identifier: | JB/067/252/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 67.

Date_1

1826-05-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-6

Box

067

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

252

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a2

Penner

john neal

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

22085

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in