JB/047/055/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/055/001: Difference between revisions

Beanhedge (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


20  5  <head>C</head><lb/>     <del><head>Of Defamation</head></del><lb/>or the who has the authority of a father,<lb/> could nor [HERE] their authority,the in<lb/>in the state, the other in this <sic>famity</sic><!-- family with the l crossed? -->, if they<lb/> were provided with the power of coercion for<lb/>publishing disredeeres. The sure <del><gap/></del><lb/><del><gap/></del><add> which</add> they <del><gap/></del> occasion from the name of<lb/> punishment or charterisment. It is <unclear>undum</unclear> <lb/> that the punishment then in question in nor<lb/> rented to her for the advantage of the<lb/> <unclear>apernterafe</unclear> of
<note>20  5</note>   <head>C</head><lb/>
 
<del><head>Of Defamation</head></del><lb/>
 


<p>or he who <del><gap/></del> has the authority of a Father,<lb/>
could not exercise their authority, the one<lb/>
in the State, the other in his <sic>famity</sic>, if they<lb/>
were provided with the power of coercion for<lb/>
punishing disobedience. The Evil <del>which they</del><lb/>
<del><gap/></del><add> which</add> they <del><gap/></del> occasion from the name of<lb/>
punishment or chastisement. It is evident<lb/>
that the punishment here in question in not<lb/>
resorted to but for the advantage of the<lb/>
assemblage of persons <del>great or small</del> <add>more or less <gap/></add> <del>over</del> of<lb/>
which they respectively have the control,<lb/>
and it is unnecessary to observe that this<lb/>
being a part of their legitimate authority so<lb/>
<note>its exercise <del>reg</del> <add>demands</add><lb/>
no separate justification<lb/></note>
in its of a complete justification, since nobody<lb/>
would either take <add>exercise</add> himself the authority of a<lb/>
judicial officer or of a Father if he were not<lb/>
completely protected in the exercise of his power.<lb/></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:02, 6 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

20 5 C
Of Defamation

or he who has the authority of a Father,
could not exercise their authority, the one
in the State, the other in his famity, if they
were provided with the power of coercion for
punishing disobedience. The Evil which they
which they occasion from the name of
punishment or chastisement. It is evident
that the punishment here in question in not
resorted to but for the advantage of the
assemblage of persons great or small more or less over of
which they respectively have the control,
and it is unnecessary to observe that this
being a part of their legitimate authority so
its exercise reg demands
no separate justification
in its of a complete justification, since nobody
would either take exercise himself the authority of a
judicial officer or of a Father if he were not
completely protected in the exercise of his power.


Identifier: | JB/047/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

055

Info in main headings field

of defamation

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 f18 / d5 f20

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14923

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in