JB/159/235/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/235/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/235/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/235/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>4</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Restraints on operations and occupations examined.</head></p>
 
<p>liable to objection on another score:  to wit that of Exemplarity.<lb/>
 
From the particular <add>character &amp;</add> circumstances of that individual,<lb/>
 
the punishment was on his <add>that one</add> instance indeed<lb/>
competent.  But that character and those circumstances<lb/>
though known to the Judge <del>would not</del> <add>are more</add><lb/>
probably than people <add>the public</add> at large can be made acquainted<lb/>
with:  or if <del>the</del> people in general are acquainted<lb/>
with them, the mortification which such a restraint <del>would</del><lb/>
produced in him would be greater <add>different</add> than what what<lb/>
many, perhaps most people would expect too feel<lb/>
were they <add>to be</add> in his place.<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> [See Fr. Pen. Law. 49.]</note>
</p>
<p><del>We see</del> Instances <del>it</del> indeed<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> are not wanting in our <add>Statute</add> Law</note> <del>now and then</del> <add>are now and then to be met with</add> of persons <del>being</del><lb/>
who being looked upon as delinquents are debarred<lb/>
from the exercise of particular occupations.  Thus Papists<lb/>
<del>but it is with another view.  I mean even where the<lb/>
persons in question are treated as delinquents</del><lb/>
are <add>by <del>a</del> several Statutes <del>of James 1</del></add> debarred from exercising the professions of Law<lb/>
and Physic.  <del>So are</del> <add>In like manner</add> persons who refuse to<lb/>
take the Sacrament according to the ceremonies of<lb/>
the Church of England are debarred <add>excluded</add> from all <add>Public</add> offices.<lb/>
<del>of <add>Public</add> Trust and Profit</del>  But these restraints do not<lb/>
seem to have been intended to operate as Punishments.<lb/>
With regard to Papists the end of Punishment<lb/>
is endeavoured to be compassed by other hardships<lb/>
too <add>general &amp; too</add> severe to be looked upon <add>in</add> any other light<lb/>
than that of Punishment.  The <add>particular</add> restraints here <del>mentioned</del> <add>in question</add><lb/>
are intended obviously <add>principally</add> but as cautionary expedients to<lb/>
<add>prevent</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:15, 23 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

4

Restraints on operations and occupations examined.

liable to objection on another score: to wit that of Exemplarity.
From the particular character & circumstances of that individual,
the punishment was on his that one instance indeed
competent. But that character and those circumstances
though known to the Judge would not are more
probably than people the public at large can be made acquainted
with: or if the people in general are acquainted
with them, the mortification which such a restraint would
produced in him would be greater different than what what
many, perhaps most people would expect too feel
were they to be in his place. [See Fr. Pen. Law. 49.]

We see Instances it indeed are not wanting in our Statute Law now and then are now and then to be met with of persons being
who being looked upon as delinquents are debarred
from the exercise of particular occupations. Thus Papists
but it is with another view. I mean even where the
persons in question are treated as delinquents

are by a several Statutes of James 1 debarred from exercising the professions of Law
and Physic. So are In like manner persons who refuse to
take the Sacrament according to the ceremonies of
the Church of England are debarred excluded from all Public offices.
of Public Trust and Profit But these restraints do not
seem to have been intended to operate as Punishments.
With regard to Papists the end of Punishment
is endeavoured to be compassed by other hardships
too general & too severe to be looked upon in any other light
than that of Punishment. The particular restraints here mentioned in question
are intended obviously principally but as cautionary expedients to
prevent


Identifier: | JB/159/235/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

235

Info in main headings field

restraints on operations and occupations examined

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

in 2 pieces

ID Number

54058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in