JB/159/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/013/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/159/013/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Punishment &amp; Restraint. Warburton </head>
<p>5</p>
distinctions by examining the use that is made of
<p><head>Punishment 𝓧 Restraint Warburton </head></p>
them.
<p>distinctions by examining the use that is made of<lb/>
<p>An act of restraint then is <hi rend="superscript">according to his Lordship</hi> any act whereby
them.</p>
pain is inflicted <hi rend="superscript">but "no</hi> more than what is just necessary
<p>An act of restraint then is <add>according to his Lordship</add> any act whereby<lb/>
"to reflect the evil it is employed to combat.</p>
pain is inflicted but <add>"no</add> more than what is just necessary<lb/>
<p>An act of punishment is <hi rend="superscript">according to his Lordship</hi> any act whereby
"to reflect the evil it is employ'd to combat.</p>
pain is inflicted "more than what is just ne-
<p>An act of punishment is a<add>ccording to his Lordship</add> any act whereby<lb/>
-cessary to repel the evil" it is employed to combat</p>
pain is inflicted "more than what is just necessary<lb/>
<p>Here however I find myself under another em-
"to repel the evil" it is employ'd to combat</p>
-barassment: for the word <hi rend="underline">evil</hi> is by the Bishop <del>his Lordship</del>
<p>Here however I find myself under another embarassment:<lb/>
used in <gap/><hi rend="superscript">two senses</hi> which to his Lordship  
for the word <hi rend="underline">evil</hi> is by <del>his Lordship</del> <add>the Bishop</add>
<hi rend="superscript">both of them</hi> accurate as well as familiar: but of which <hi rend="superscript">to <gap/></hi>gap/> one at<note>and consistent</note>
used in <del>a sense</del> <add>two senses</add> which to his Lordship seems <add><del>both</del></add><lb/>
least seems inaccurate, and both together dis-
<add>both of them</add> accurate and <add>as well as</add> familiar: but of which <add>to <unclear>me</unclear></add> one at<lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">-parate to and in-</hi>-consistent with each other.</p>
least seems inaccurate, and both together dis<add>parate<lb/>
<p>Of evils he makes two sorts:<note>which two sorts are <note></note></note> mischief and
to &amp; in</add>consistent
crimes.  <del><note></note></del>A mischief is, with him, <gap/>"an
disparate to and inconsistent with each other.</p>
evil that proceeds not from the will". A crime
<p>Of evils he makes two <add><del>opposite</del> </add>sorts<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> which two sorts are mentioned as distinct &amp; opposite.</note>:  mischief and<lb/>
is "an evil that <hi rend="superscript">does</hi>proceed from the will". </p>
crimes.  <del>Any</del> A mischief is, with him, <del><gap/></del> a new <add>"an</add><lb/>
<p>If this <unclear>can</unclear>be <del><gap/></del>accurate, it will be true to say
evil that proceeds not from the will".   A crime<lb/>
in case of our meeting with any evil that does
is "an evil that <add>does</add> proceed from the will". </p>
<del>not</del>proceed from the will that it is not a
<p>If this <del>is</del> be <del>too</del> accurate, it will be true to say<lb/>
mischief.  If then <hi rend="superscript">a man were to give his Lordship <del>give you</del> a blow</hi>voluntarily that
in case of our meeting with any evil that does<lb/>
is in such <gap/>that the man's giving <del>you</del> him the blow
<del>not</del>proceed from the will that it is not a<lb/>
pain his Lordship <del><gap/></del>in consequence of <del><gap/></del><hi rend="superscript">the man's giving <del>you</del>him the blow</hi>
mischief.  If then <del>I let you</del> <add>a man were to give his Lordship <del>give you</del> a blow</add> voluntarily that<lb/>
proceeding from the man's <del><gap/></del> will, such pain is
<add>is in such manner that the</add> pain <del>you</del> <add>his Lordship</add> felt in consequence of man's giving <del>you</del> him the blow
not a mischief. Such a position, I imagine, is
pain his Lordship <del><gap/></del>in consequence of <del>many beating your</del> <add>the man's giving <del>you</del> him the blow</add><lb/>  
more than his Lordship <del>you</del> would be willing to allow.</p>
proceed<del>ing</del><add>ed</add> from <del>you –any</del> <add>the man's</add> will, such pain is<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
not a mischief. Such a position, I imagine, is<lb/>
 
more than <del>you</del> <add>his Lordship</add> would be willing to allow.</p>
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 24 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

5

Punishment 𝓧 Restraint – Warburton

distinctions by examining the use that is made of
them.

An act of restraint then is according to his Lordship any act whereby
pain is inflicted but "no more than what is just necessary
"to reflect the evil it is employ'd to combat.

An act of punishment is according to his Lordship any act whereby
pain is inflicted "more than what is just necessary
"to repel the evil" it is employ'd to combat

Here however I find myself under another embarassment:
for the word evil is by his Lordship the Bishop used in a sense two senses which to his Lordship seems both
both of them accurate and as well as familiar: but of which to me one at
least seems inaccurate, and both together disparate
to & in
consistent disparate to and inconsistent with each other.

Of evils he makes two opposite sorts which two sorts are mentioned as distinct & opposite.: mischief and
crimes. Any A mischief is, with him, a new "an
evil that proceeds not from the will". A crime
is "an evil that does proceed from the will".

If this is be too accurate, it will be true to say
in case of our meeting with any evil that does
notproceed from the will that it is not a
mischief. If then I let you a man were to give his Lordship give you a blow voluntarily that
is in such manner that the pain you his Lordship felt in consequence of man's giving you him the blow pain his Lordship in consequence of many beating your the man's giving you him the blow
proceedinged from you –any the man's will, such pain is
not a mischief. Such a position, I imagine, is
more than you his Lordship would be willing to allow.


Identifier: | JB/159/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

punishment & restraint warburton

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53836

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in