JB/159/108/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/108/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/108/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/108/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>4)</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Expence incurred by Punishment.</head></p>
 
<p>Is is expedient <add>right</add> the state should put punishment<lb/>
 
<hi rend="underline">really</hi> in practise?  <del>why?</del> <add><del>You and</del> Most certainly.  But why?</add> for the sake of [producing]<lb/>
 
the <hi rend="underline">appearance</hi> of it.  Upon the principle<lb/>
of utility, <add>(except as to <del>have</del> so much as it necessary for reformation &amp; compensation)</add> for this reason, and for no other whatsoever.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> To wish to do it for any other reason, would be to abandon the principle of utility, and to resort to that of vengeance.</note>  Every particle of <add>real</add> punishment that is produced<lb/>
more than what is necessary for the production<lb/>
of the requisite quantity of apparent,<lb/>
is just so much misery run to waste.  Hence<lb/>
results a very obvious practical lesson;  which<lb/>
is to make the real punishment as <del>great</del> <add>small</add><lb/>
and the apparent as great as may be.  If it<lb/>
were possible by hanging a man <hi rend="underline">in effigie</hi> to<lb/>
produce the same salutary impression of terror<lb/>
upon the minds of the people, it would be folly<lb/>
or cruelty ever to hang a man <hi rend="underline">in person</hi>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:56, 27 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

4)

Expence incurred by Punishment.

Is is expedient right the state should put punishment
really in practise? why? You and Most certainly. But why? for the sake of [producing]
the appearance of it. Upon the principle
of utility, (except as to have so much as it necessary for reformation & compensation) for this reason, and for no other whatsoever. To wish to do it for any other reason, would be to abandon the principle of utility, and to resort to that of vengeance. Every particle of real punishment that is produced
more than what is necessary for the production
of the requisite quantity of apparent,
is just so much misery run to waste. Hence
results a very obvious practical lesson; which
is to make the real punishment as great small
and the apparent as great as may be. If it
were possible by hanging a man in effigie to
produce the same salutary impression of terror
upon the minds of the people, it would be folly
or cruelty ever to hang a man in person.


Identifier: | JB/159/108/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

108

Info in main headings field

expence of punishment

Image

004

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / d2 / d3 / d4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53931

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in