★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p><head>Simple afflictive Punishments</head><lb/> | <p><head>Simple afflictive Punishments</head><lb/> | ||
<note>Ins.</note></p> | <note>Ins.</note></p> | ||
<p><head>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> I NOTE</head></p> | <p><head>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> I NOTE</head><lb/> | ||
From p.3.</p> | |||
<p><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> I make no separate mention here of <hi rend="underline">Re-action</hi> of <hi rend="underline">Friction</hi>.</note><lb/> | |||
[a] I am <del>[sometimes</del> tempted to think that <hi rend="underline">Friction</hi><lb/> | |||
might be <add>accounted for by</add> [reduced to] Attraction of Cohesion, <add>and</add> S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/> | |||
Isaac Newton's <hi rend="underline">Re-action</hi> <del>and <gap/></del> [to] <add>by</add><lb/> | |||
Elasticity. <del>& perhaps also his <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del>.</p> | |||
<p><head>NOTE</head><lb/> | |||
From p.3.</p> | |||
<p>[c] <del>This distinction may serve to</del><lb/> | |||
These distinctions will serve to mark out<lb/> | |||
the only <add><hi rend="underline">natural</hi></add> line of separation I can find <del>for</del> <add>between</add> the<lb/> | |||
several branches of Natural knowledge here in<lb/> | |||
question. The distinction between Natural Philosophy<lb/> | |||
and Chymistry, as if <del>Chymistry</del> the<lb/> | |||
latter were not included in the <del>latter</del> former<lb/> | |||
is entirely an accidental one: taken not from<lb/> | |||
the nature of the sciences themselves, but from the<lb/> | |||
practise of the men who happen'd to apply themselves<lb/> | |||
to them. <del>To <add>many branches of</add></del> Chymistry, <del>in</del> particularly<lb/> | |||
<del>t</del> certain branches of it, <del>men</del> had <add>been</add> applied <del>themselves</del> <add>to</add><lb/> | |||
from particular views<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> (such as that of finding ew medicines, or making gold) by men</note> <del>without paying any</del> <add>who <del>had</del> paid no</add><lb/> | |||
attention to the other branches of Natural Philosophy.<lb/> | |||
Thence it came, for I can find no other reason,<lb/> | |||
that <del>persons</del> <add>men</add> professing Natural Philosophy,<lb/> | |||
without having such particular views, thought<lb/> | |||
they had nothing to do with Chymistry.</p> | |||
<p><head>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> III NOTE</head><lb/> | |||
From p.3.</p> | |||
<p>[b] The <hi rend="underline">Vitriolic</hi>; called in trade <hi rend="underline">Oil</hi> & <hi rend="underline">Spirit</hi> of <hi rend="underline">Vitriol</hi>:<lb/> | |||
The <hi rend="underline">Marmi</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Muriatic</hi>, called in trade <hi rend="underline">Spirit</hi><lb/> | |||
of <hi rend="underline">Salt</hi>: The <hi rend="underline">Nitrous</hi>; called in trade <hi rend="underline">Spirit of Nitro</hi><lb/> | |||
and <hi rend="underline">Aqua fortis</hi>. By the Statute 6.G.1. c.23 § 11<lb/> | |||
a practise that had then become common of throwing <hi rend="underline">Aquar<lb/> | |||
fortis</hi> on <del>people</del> <add>persons</add> <del>as they walked along</del> on the streets was<lb/> | |||
prohibited under particular penalties. See 4 Comm. p.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1
Simple afflictive Punishments
Ins.
No I NOTE
From p.3.
⊞ ⊞ I make no separate mention here of Re-action of Friction.
[a] I am [sometimes tempted to think that Friction
might be accounted for by [reduced to] Attraction of Cohesion, and Sr
Isaac Newton's Re-action and [to] by
Elasticity. & perhaps also his .
NOTE
From p.3.
[c] This distinction may serve to
These distinctions will serve to mark out
the only natural line of separation I can find for between the
several branches of Natural knowledge here in
question. The distinction between Natural Philosophy
and Chymistry, as if Chymistry the
latter were not included in the latter former
is entirely an accidental one: taken not from
the nature of the sciences themselves, but from the
practise of the men who happen'd to apply themselves
to them. To many branches of Chymistry, in particularly
t certain branches of it, men had been applied themselves to
from particular views⊞ ⊞ (such as that of finding ew medicines, or making gold) by men without paying any who had paid no
attention to the other branches of Natural Philosophy.
Thence it came, for I can find no other reason,
that persons men professing Natural Philosophy,
without having such particular views, thought
they had nothing to do with Chymistry.
No III NOTE
From p.3.
[b] The Vitriolic; called in trade Oil & Spirit of Vitriol:
The Marmi or Muriatic, called in trade Spirit
of Salt: The Nitrous; called in trade Spirit of Nitro
and Aqua fortis. By the Statute 6.G.1. c.23 § 11
a practise that had then become common of throwing Aquar
fortis on people persons as they walked along on the streets was
prohibited under particular penalties. See 4 Comm. p.
|
Identifier: | JB/159/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
159 |
punishment |
||
|
146 |
simple afflictive punishments |
||
|
001 |
no. i note / note / no. iii note |
||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
|
caroline vernon |
|||
|
53969 |
|||
