★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/148/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/159/148/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>2</p> | |||
<p><head>Simple afflictive Punishments examined</head><lb/> | |||
<note>Equability.</note></p> | |||
<p>portion of Infamy. The magnitude of the Infamy does<lb/> | |||
<del>not as the magnitude of</del> <add>not encrease and decrease with</add> the other punishment: on the<lb/> | |||
contrary the Infamy is apt to be <add>at the</add> greatest where the<lb/> | |||
organical pain is at the least. This impairs the variability<lb/> | |||
of the whole punishment taken together: a<lb/> | |||
large <del>encrease</del> <add>portion</add> of Infamy <del>is inflicted</del> <add>adheres to</add> the slightest<lb/> | |||
<del>way in which a</del> <add>measure of <del>simply</del> afflictive</add> punishment <del>of</del> that can be applied.<lb/> | |||
This Infamy is the more grievous in proportion to the<lb/> | |||
rank of the offender. <del>In most European nations</del> Owing<lb/> | |||
to this circumstance, in most European nations there<lb/> | |||
is no punishment of the <del>afflictive kind</del> <add>kind for a <del><gap/> of the</del> gentleman</add> that can<lb/> | |||
be called <add>a</add> light one.</p> | |||
<p>It was the inattention to this circumstance that was the<lb/> | |||
cause of the dissatisfaction <del>entertained by many</del> occasioned<lb/> | |||
by the Statute <unclear>10</unclear> G.3. c. ... called the Dog Act.<lb/> | |||
It was made to restrain the stealing of Dogs: among the<lb/> | |||
punishments appointed is that of whipping. <del>These favorite<lb/> | |||
and domestic animals are of all articles of property<lb/>those whi</del> There is something in the nature of this<lb/> | |||
species of property which makes the theft of it an <add>a</add><lb/> | |||
offence <add>kind of misbehaviour</add> less incompatible with the character of<lb/> | |||
a gentleman than any other theft. It <del>is</del> is apt to<lb/> | |||
meet with indulgence from the moral sanction for the<lb/> | |||
same reason that Adultery does or the enticing of a<lb/> | |||
servant, <add>both</add> which if it were not for the rational qualities of<lb/> | |||
<del>a</del> the subject of property in question, would be regarded<lb/> | |||
in the light of Thefts. For the like reasons a person really<lb/> | |||
<add>innocent</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
2
Simple afflictive Punishments examined
Equability.
portion of Infamy. The magnitude of the Infamy does
not as the magnitude of not encrease and decrease with the other punishment: on the
contrary the Infamy is apt to be at the greatest where the
organical pain is at the least. This impairs the variability
of the whole punishment taken together: a
large encrease portion of Infamy is inflicted adheres to the slightest
way in which a measure of simply afflictive punishment of that can be applied.
This Infamy is the more grievous in proportion to the
rank of the offender. In most European nations Owing
to this circumstance, in most European nations there
is no punishment of the afflictive kind kind for a of the gentleman that can
be called a light one.
It was the inattention to this circumstance that was the
cause of the dissatisfaction entertained by many occasioned
by the Statute 10 G.3. c. ... called the Dog Act.
It was made to restrain the stealing of Dogs: among the
punishments appointed is that of whipping. These favorite
and domestic animals are of all articles of property
those whi There is something in the nature of this
species of property which makes the theft of it an a
offence kind of misbehaviour less incompatible with the character of
a gentleman than any other theft. It is is apt to
meet with indulgence from the moral sanction for the
same reason that Adultery does or the enticing of a
servant, both which if it were not for the rational qualities of
a the subject of property in question, would be regarded
in the light of Thefts. For the like reasons a person really
innocent
|
Identifier: | JB/159/148/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
159 |
punishment |
||
|
148 |
simple afflictive punishments |
||
|
002 |
frugality / certainty / equability |
||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1/ f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
|
caroline vernon |
|||
|
53971 |
|||
